"The judge said that my testimony is lies"

The reason for the establishment of the case on Katelevsky was his participation in a series of single pickets near the building of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Moscow. Katelevsky, like another four picketers, opposed the arbitrariness of the police and the court due to the fact that in April 2016 he was delayed twice for shooting near the Russian Office building in Ramensky near Moscow, and then sent twice under arrest. During one of the detentions from Katelevsky, a telephone was selected with the dictaphone turned on. Later, the activist published a record : on her it is heard how the police discuss whether to throw something into the things of the detainee, and then negotiate with the judge. Police officers were reprimanded . Katelevsky demanded that Oleg Muchkina and Judge of the Ramensky City Court be held accountable for the head of the Ramenskoye Department of Internal Affairs.

It all started due to the fact that Golyshev and Muchkina did not want to hold accountable (story with a recorder). I decided: since dozens of people do not react to my statements and statements, I will get up with a single picket near the building of the Ministry of Internal Affairs on a living 16, maybe then they will pay attention to the terrible and proven charm. Made a note in social networks about the event.

It all started at the metro, the unhealthy interest of the police in my person appeared.

With the poster, I managed to stand for about five minutes, the boss went through and ordered to knit me. There were no reasons or requirements.

Drawn up a protocol under Part 5 of Art. 20.2 Administrative Code and disappeared for four months. My wife accidentally stumbled upon, looking at the practice of the Zamoskvoretsky court, to the last name, similar to mine - Katalevsky, and the case, similar to mine.

There were no notifications of either the summons, as we later learned from the case file. They wanted to see quietly, without noise, without me.

Upon learning of the case for a day, not having time to prepare, on December 30, 2016, we appeared in court and immediately faced the impregnation at the hearing due to the fact that I had a press card and amateur camera in my bag. After half an hour of bickering and a statement of confusion to justice, I was admitted.

After getting acquainted with the case materials, we realized that there is no evidence of my guilt at all. There was a protocol in the case, in which there was only what I violated part 5 of Art. 20.2., My explanations that I did not violate anything, the testimonies of my witnesses by Andrei Orl and Konstantin Altukhov, a couple of explanations of unknown persons written as a carbon copy - as it later became known, these are police officers Kolobanov and Borisov. Explanations are taken without a signature of responsibility for giving false testimony, which means that they cannot be testimony.

The judge refused almost all petitions and postponed the meeting on 01/09/2017 at 9:10.

In the morning near the court building, we were waiting for as many as three auto -zats with riot police.

During acquaintance with the materials, we found the detention protocol drawn up by a police officer Katashov Bair, who forged his own and my signatures in the protocol (there are screenshots - they are not at all similar at all). After the interrogation of the witnesses, not one answered who made me the requirements, and not a single police officer confirmed his explanations, constantly confused in the testimony. The judge rejected the petition for the introduction of the video of my picket, but was overgrown. In the decision, the judge said that the video is a fake, my testimony is a lie, and the police have no reason not to trust and my fault was proved by the detention protocol (which is a rough fake).

CURTAIN