Dima, Masha and "Rain"

Dima Peskov and Masha Zakharova, two “speaking heads” of the Russian authorities, stood up for the Rain TV channel, whose broadcasting in the Ukrainian television ceases due to violations of the legislation of the prolate. By the way, I am not at all going to rush stones in the "rain" for these violations. "Rain" is a Russian television channel that naturally lives according to the laws of his country. Refusing the demonstration of geographical maps of this country, on which the stolen Crimea is indicated as the Russian territory is not so simple. Do not talk about the Russian-Ukrainian "border" inside Ukraine, between the Kherson region and the Crimea, and that is more difficult. And so on.

It is amazing for me that the “rain” was forbidden to broadcast in Ukraine, but the fact that there are still channels of the aggressor state fighting with Russia on the television broadcast of Russia. I think that it will be possible to allow them to broadcast only after the restoration of the territorial integrity of our country and the trial of Russian military criminals - even if the place of this process will be Moscow, not Kyiv. I am even ready for a compromise - to include "rain" or NTV during this process: let them give live the testimony of Putin, Lavrov without a cigar and sleeping Medvedev. And we will see - even without subtitles in Ukrainian and with advertising Gazprom, if one still exist.

I am much more amazed by Dima and Masha, who tell us about the Ukrainian "destruction". Yes, Dima and Masha, today "rain" can be seen in any Ukrainian TV. And in what kind of Russian TV can you see "rain"? In the window in the spring?

The impudence of Russian officials sometimes goes beyond the boundaries of ordinary logic. They turned a small news channel into a reservation for the Moscow public, considering themselves an intelligentsia, kicked out this channel from everywhere, where it was only possible to do, but they were outraged because of the Ukrainian "destructiveness". I wonder if Dima and Masha know, in how many Russian cities cable operators give their subscribers the opportunity to connect to the "rain"? At fifteen! You will not turn on the rain in St. Petersburg, nor in Khabarovsk, nor in Chita, nor in Ufa, in Chelyabinsk, nor in Kemerovo, nor in Yaroslavl, in Vladimir, or in Terrosny, nor in Tula, or in Orel. Forgive me, Dima and Masha, but in Israel there are more cities in which you can watch "rain" than in Russia. And you are busy with "Ukrainian destructiveness" and complaints in the OSCE. Take care of yourself.

But you do not take care. Because if Russian television were like “rain” (even with all the caution and carefulness of the canal), if millions of Russians had heard at least what Belkovsky and Nevzorov say, and not the paranoid nonsense that you, Dima and Masha, along with all your wort of the Kiselevs, Nightingless and pushing, would not have any press secretaries, and yours. The chefs would have been sitting for a long time not in the offices, but on the very bench of the defendants, the picture of which I expect to look at the "rain". But no matter what nonsense you say and no matter who you now blame for violation of freedom of speech, sooner or later you will definitely see this picture. And you will even participate in its creation. I hope not as witnesses.

A drop is sharpening a stone.