Kutorg, what a grace!

Pyotr Olegovich in bewilderment. Only, he says , people with a sick imagination and who do not know the stories of their country can see in my words "signs of anti -Semitism." Whereas the vice speaker of the lower house only warned against the repetition of events that happened a hundred years ago, after which thousands of temples were defeated, and hundreds of thousands of people were exiled and shot. In other words, he is not at all a sodophob or a bastard, as some commentators hastened to conclude. Simply, like the great ancestor, he experienced a feeling of indignation and could not be silent. The ancestor was excommunicated from the church, and the descendant, look, will drive from the Duma. Although it is unlikely, of course.

We are also at a loss. Disputes around the absorption by the Church of the Isaac's Cathedral are rather sharp, but what does the defeated temples have to do with it? It is known that a couple of weeks ago the God-fearing Poltavchenko decided to transfer the Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church, the public made protests, the case could reach the court , and the Vice Speaker took the word. In the disagreed descendant of the excommunicated unexpectedly discerned the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of those who crushed our temples, jumping out there ... Due to the features of settled with Nagan in the seventeenth year , and this, of course, made a strong impression on many listeners. Which, they say, for great -grandchildren, those where they jumped out, and whether the vice speaker is notorious cattle - such questions, as they say, hung in the air and are still hanging.

The main thing is not clear what kind of connection the speaker has seen between, frankly, Jews with the Nagans inherent in them - and the signathers of letters in defense of Isaac, which has never belonged to the church. We need specific names. For example, the St. Petersburg Union of Scientists urged the authorities not to rush out of extreme , then destroying the temples, otherwise it was not analyzed by giving them away the Russian Orthodox Church, and I would like to clarify: who, among these very educated citizens, stained himself with kinship with the sacrifice? Among the great -grandfathers of radio hosts and deputies mentioned by Tolstoy, who specifically destroyed the Church in those years when the tribe of Pushkinoads literally let in overcoats with the Nagans ? Yes, and those workers with the peasants who mainly mocked the shrines and killed the priests - who was there who was considered to be Judea there? List to the studio!

Along the way, another problem arises. It would seem, long and forever resolved. If the impudent ancestor of the vice-speaker rebelled against Orthodoxy, will we be for this to scold and punish the Patriot-Proper? Yes, and Lev Nikolaevich, if you figure it out, is not responsible for the moron heir in a straight line with his Goebbels rhetoric. The mirror of the Russian revolution is completely innocent in what fragments scattered from it in a crystal night. The son for his father does not answer, as Comrade taught us. Stalin, who destroyed enemies with whole families, especially the great-granddaughter, for example, for the great-grandmother, so where is the cheese-brow?

Apparently, there is a clear misunderstanding. It is noticeable that his excellency deputy uninosoros is a soul for the church and faith. It can be seen even how the whole shines and shakes. That is why, sick, and to be angry with those who, like a lion Tolstoy, argue with hierarchs and reproach them for money -grub and other sins. The great -grandson wants to betray the atheists anathematize, but how is it best to brand them, if you can’t call the Jews, picking up an unambiguous euphemism? Here, we can say, a tradition consecrated for centuries and millennia is traced. There was also no grafiev, and Christians, and the custom of dumping all the troubles on the pacenas with the Nagans already existed and letters were blocked for their dissident arrogance.

And today, a little that, the most indifferent and excitable on the moves of the Bulti in tradition, as in a swamp, and sit on the ears in the mud, talk. Who about the lampshades, who are about the Holocaust in which the Jews themselves are guilty, some about the line of sedimentary, depending on temperament and historical knowledge. Naturally, the scandal is flared up, and it is very important that a wise person is being found who would explain to us the meaning of what is happening and the meaning of individual phrases. Yesterday, fortunately, such a person was found. Moreover, with the answer was found to all our questions addressed to Peter Tolstoy.

It turned out to be the senior comrade of the vice -speaker - Speaker Volodin himself. That is, we can only guess what words he could address to the younger comrade in a personal conversation, and we can hardly be mistaken if we say that these words are not subject to citation in the open press. Like, what are you, the count, just entered the post and immediately went around ... and various other expressions. However, going to the rostrum, the speaker spoke out in a completely different way. In the stylistics that is otherwise than parliamentary.

It turned out that Tolstoy was not in vain perplexed, suffering from human misunderstanding. Surrounded by experts on the set of sedimentary, Volodin indicated that this term was applied to the convicts , and if one of the readers wears a hat, I would advise immediately to remove it in front of the speaker as a sign of admiration. And the point is not that no one called the hard labor, at least to look at Dalya, even where, but what a speaker! Before that is smart that there is nowhere to put the stigma.

Something even in such a cunning, you agree, peeps a foreign tribe, crafty, Jewish. To turn for political purposes, excizing a deceived subordinate, hard labor and a link to the line of sedimentation - this is a rare art, this, you know, is an examination of the highest grade. Hybrid, if you use a modern language, in which any word, event or historical fact today can mean anything. Volodin is a head!

Unlike Peter Tolstoy, who is still fighting off bloody sketches and still cannot fight back. He speaks about commissars, otherwise he suddenly convicts his enemies in anti -Semitism. Still, he is rusticly, Peter Olegovich, for nothing that a descendant. True, Lev Nikolayevich is closer to the end of his life and called for reference, but he hardly had in mind brain activity. Yes, and he was not an anti -Semite, which once again proves to us with what a scope genius rests in his offspring. Leaving us alone with this painful mystery of being: here Tolstoy seems to be like a great-great-grandfather, but Haji Murat does not write, he won’t do a new religion, he won’t say humanistic speeches, and it would not be better to open his mouth at all. Two worlds - two Shapiro, as said on a different reason, but here it is just right, perfectly fits.