Tin eile-expert

Each time after the day spent in court, I acutely feel my unprofessionalism, amateur. Not because I am doing something not like the defender, not because it is not competent enough (probably, but against the general background of “professionalism” it is not very noticeable), but because after such a day I feel completely squeezed, which is wrong for the pro. But today I have been dumb for several hours, not knowing how to tell ...

He defended Dmitry Melash in the Nagatinsky court in an administrative case. Rare (so far) Art. 20.29 Administrative Code of the Russian Federation - "Distribution of extremist materials."

To protect the case is hopeless: everything is obvious. And the “offender” pleaded guilty - what was left to do?

I’ll make a reservation right away: no claims are strictly according to the law - everything is according to the law and generally normal: the defender (your humble servant) is admitted, the request for time to get acquainted with the case is satisfied, the “offender” and the defender are heard, clearly heard, our arguments and all circumstances of the case are taken into account, and the result is a fine of 2000 rubles (and not 15 days, we will not dispute. But…

And here everything begins. The case was formally referred to the court from the Zyablikovo police department, only it was sculpted by the eagles from the EC center. They were conscientiously sculpting: the administrative case was the thickness of the good volume of the criminal! Its essence is simple: obviously, for reporting on the “extremists” identified by vigilant echniks, a video on the “offender” page in VKontakte was trampled, in which he conveys greetings to his friend, being dressed in a T -shirt with the logo of the Azov battalion, by the way, the official logo of the official division of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine.

And some time ago, the district court in Vladimir recognized this logo as an “extremist image” and brought it to the register of prohibited in Russia. Where this register can be viewed - the question (and if possible, is it not a reproduction of this logo on it by the “distribution of extremist materials” is another question), but you can’t argue with the fact. Because the conscientious employees of the E -E Center introduced to our administrative case not only the decision of the District Court of the city of Vladimir, but also all the examinations, on the basis of which this decision was made!

Of these, in particular, you can find out that questions were put before the experts, whether they were equally extremist ... PA-PA-PAM! - The first line of the anthem of Ukraine, its state emblem and much more!

Once again, according to syllables: experts at the request of the investigation seriously considered the question of whether it should be recognized as extremist (that is, prohibited in Russia) the initial line of the state anthem of the neighboring sovereign country and its state emblem! And at the same time, the official logo of the official unit of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of this sovereign country!

And on the basis of these examinations, the District Court in the city of Vladimir Azov recognized as extremist!

It remains to wait for the magistrate court of the village of Gadyukino to recognize the official symbol of NATO, OPEC or the UN extremist.

You understand, without the vigilance of the employees of the Center “E” (Vladimir, in this case), this case with examinations would not have taken place either.

That is, paid from our pocket, it seems like to fight extremism .... Crap! And after all, they plow conscientiously: and the official response on the identification of the IP address of the “offender” from VKontakte requested (and he posted it-NB-this is not some overseas Facebook!) And they attached it. That is, they worked!

Offer ecstromism on the most unable!