The dilemma of the prisoner

Imagine: you are in a pre -trial detention center, you are not to blame for anything, and the investigator offers you a choice. Either to stipulate yourself, or to persist, without admitting guilt. In the first case, he promises you the “special procedure for considering” the case in court, and it is possible that it will be so. You, the innocent, will be sent to the camp, but the sentence will be softened. In the second case, you will play with Femida in a tape measure: either pan is free - or disappeared to the fullest.

The question is - what to do?

It is believed that it is always necessary to act in truth - both in prison and in the wild. Moreover. Agreeing to take someone else's guilt on yourself, if only to break out of the prison walls as soon as possible, you will upset the deputy chairman of the Supreme Court Vladimir Davydov. Answering yesterday to the question why in Russia they are so rarely justified by the accused, the judge entrusted the blame for themselves. 90 out of 100 people, Vladimir Alexandrovichcalculated , confess to the deed or inconsistent. “I don’t know whether this is good or bad, but this is a fact. 65 percent go in a special order,” added the deputy chairman of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, and in these words it was easy to hear a bitter reproach for the split.

Like, how so, citizens are suspected and sentenced, why do you spoil us with human rights statistics? They would stand on their own, seeking the truths, you look - and the curve of justifying sentences would go up, and the court would free all the innocent. The curve would take it out.

However, one can understand those who are dealing with the investigation and conscience, involuntarily substituting the entire judicial system of the Russian Federation, for which the respected person, Vladimir Davydov, then has to be blown up. Imagine you are in a pre -trial detention center, you are not to blame for anything, and the investigator offers you a choice ... and a lawyer is still fussing nearby, and you need to decide quite quickly: to slander yourself, expecting condescension, or not to believe, not to be afraid, not to ask. At the same time, knowing that Russian courts practically do not bear justified sentences, and the chance that they will make an exception to you is 1%, even less.

In general, if you delve into the words of the deputy chairman, it turns out a kind of enchanted circle. The judges are atrocious, but the prisoners also behave badly, not wanting to help the judges embark on the path of correction. As a result, the average district chairman in the process about once every seven years, dousing with happy tears, releases someone from the cage. True, in courts with the participation of jury, the share of justified reaches 13%, but this phenomenon has not yet become characteristic of Russian legal proceedings. The usual talks and punitive practices remain a characteristic phenomenon.

An exemplary example here is the case of Alexei Pichugin. The detained in June 2003, he knew that he was innocent, and he had a choice. To stipulate himself, as well as the leaders of the Yukos and taking into account the active repentance and the benefits of the state, to be released in the foreseeable time - or never go out. Investigators directly told him about this. He was convinced of their innocence during the courts, which consistently sent him by 24 years and to life. The eternal captivity serving, he knows that today it can be pardoned - in exchange for testimonies that he extorted for nearly 14 years in a row. Despite the fact that Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the main "customer", as they decided in the Kremlin, sane, sane by the pichugin of murders and attempts for murders, personallycalled him "to do this."

And he does not. Being in a pre -trial detention center, in a colony for incorrigible killers, “Black Dolphin”, returned to Moscow, to Lefortovo, where he was again offered this dilemma: Salga or die in prison. He insists on his innocence for a year after the year, and the same Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, where Vladimir Davydov, who had been prior to the post of deputy chairman has been working, has been working since 1999, is also adamant . Rejecting any other decisions, including the verdict of the ECHR . Here, for Russian courts, only a “special procedure” is acceptable, as formulated in the law, as well as in the Kremlin requirements in relation to a particularly important case by Alexei Pichugin. Only bash for bash.

However, if such an order is established at the state level, in political affairs, then after all at the micro level, in the cases of criminal, investigated by local courts, the same thing should happen and is happening. Connect in the murder - and get a maximum of two -thirds from the due date, do not portize us the percentage of disclosure. Give a business, sit down a little - and free yourself with a clear conscience. Repent - and forgiveness will come out. It is said that the poor are blessed by spirit, and if the prison, especially the Russian one, is compared with the hell, then it is logical to equalize the life of the dissolved with the paradise.

That is why it is so difficult to agree with one of our main judges, when he calls for the press not to be carried away by criticism against the femids of federal subordination, but sitting in a cage - not to live by lies. That is, there is not the slightest doubt that the chief cited citizen, if he was in a pre-trial detention center, on the bench of the defendants and in the camp, would behave like that, but the vast majority of other Russian citizens still act differently, and they have their own reasons. They have their own truth, based on the centuries -old experience of the torture investigation, torture prisons, torture camps, and only units can argue with this truth with this truth. And the experience will change when practice changes, which is hardly possible until the judges change in Russia. Starting from the supreme and the guarantor of all our rights.