Georgy Yuryev: Bored Ethics

This is a text about what is neokly managing Russia. The author’s approach is based on the results of many years of research using egoscopy-synchronous diagnosis of meaning-physiological communications of role-playing "I" in the inner world of a person (ethics) and people with each other (morality).

Ethics as part of philosophy arose in ancient Greece ("ethos" - "temper, custom"). At first, it was about the rules of the joint life of people. Then the topics of conscience, good and evil, sympathy, friendship, self -sacrifice, mercy, justice, solidarity, and so on were added to this meaning. The modern normativeness of moral concepts and assessments is dual: some explain them with divine meaning, others objective causes of people's behavior. However, the so -called golden rule of ethics is practically in doubt: "Do not do what you do not want to yourself." In my opinion, this rule is a consequence of an unobvious delusion due to the lack of an adequate tool for measuring the "ethical body" of a person. For example, a "dreaming" body is actively involved in the most incredible events of sleep, even flies. The wakeful body behaves differently and feels in everyday situations of moral “good” and “evil”: joyful when something turns out, and grieved, when something happens contrary to the expected, and this is normal. Different states of the ethical body are functionally associated with physiological processes and social events. In esotericism, they are called subtle matter, in Christian culture - soul (ethics) and spirit (morality). The ethical body of an individual, a family, a social group can be balanced or very “prickly” in some significant matters.

Egoscopic dimensions according to the criterion of "joy - grief" allow us to say that there are at least four ethical models and four variants of the Golden Ethics. In the intuitive-evaluative scale of the normal model, the joy in (+), and grief in (–-). There are still three "defective" models: excessively optimistic, with joy and chagrin in (+); Excessively pessimistic, both in (–-) and turned over when joy in ( -), and grief in (+) is the lot of moral twin, sadomasochists.

Hoosers of different ethical models unconsciously try on the "golden rule" for themselves, loved. Conflict communications between them give rise to misunderstanding, growing up with bodily discomfort, social and medical problems. Professionals can differ significantly in these criteria. Let us take the hippocrates oath is a model of normal ethics, and the ban on the adoption of Russian children by US citizens under the Law of Dima Yakovlev is a legal product of ethical scumbags, which is supported by 71% of respondents surveyed by the All -Russian Central Executive Committee in January 2017 (despite the fact that 64% do not consider it possible to adopt a child).

The predominance of carriers of defective ethics in relation to suffering children clearly indicates a serious illness of the ethical body of Russia. You should know that newborn children do not have their own ethics, it appears only in the process of socialization, in the process of continuous education and teaching what is “good” or “bad”. An ethical body does not correlate with the physical and psychological parameters: “The great Fedor, yes, is a fool, and Ivan Mal, may, the evolution of a normal ethical model forms wisdom, and a defective - social stupidity.

The holiday is fully: we have not given anything, we have pots and products, the leader - honor and respect, we are best, we are all very good for us

Consider the connection of ethics with the economy, which can be normative or ethical. A school example of a normative economy: there are three tribes, two learned to make different pots for storing products, and in the third they only get them in some way. Exchange relations allow each tribe to have their own income, while the mechanism of competition is included, which gradually grew into the formula "goods - money" with value added, with laws and democratic institutions for regulating competition.

The normative economy with great difficulty sprouts from an ethical economy based on the rules of ethical superiority. For example, the new leader did not like the process of trade, he decided to glorify himself and his tribe in the simplest way: they stole pots from some, and killed others, taking their pots. The holiday is fully: we have not given anything, we have pots and products, the leader - honor and respect, we are best, we are all very good for us. In this version of the economy, competition, laws and other ethical Beliberda do not need. A familiar picture? In 1917, an ethical turning and rupture of the ethical body of Russia took place according to the formula “who was nobody would become everything”, but the essence of the economy, based on the proximity to the leader in the bonding work of slaves with defective ethics, has not changed. She continues to be. The moral marriage of communist ideology is a scarcity and corrupts the people in the swamp of the ethical economy, the main enemies of which are considered to be competition, however, respect for a person because they attempt on its foundations: on a lie, for contempt for others, corruption and mythical spirituality.

The ethics of competition, labor productivity and the quality of goods are interconnected and primary for the normative economy. For an ethical economy, they have, as it were, primary, but actually secondary importance. The main thing is to inflate the "bubble" and report to the authorities. Remember the Soviet formula: "We do not work for the sake of money, but in order to get tired"? This is the motto of workers with defective ethics who produce low -quality goods according to the laws of a planned economy. Bracles in all sectors of the national economy produce a product that is not able to compete in the field of international trade. The Russian Federation accepted the baton with the USSR and “successfully” develops concern in new areas - in science and even in the space industry .

Ethics and power are intimately connected by reverse dependence: the closer ethics to the norm, the more effective the power, and vice versa, the higher the level of defective ethics in the commanding estate, the more "more vertical" and stupid. This is a Russian brand - fools, spirituality and bad roads. The role of the sovereign in this scheme is primary, he first resonates with the ethical body of the people, and then introduces his ethical model into it. He can publicly disclose alternative facts (lie), and the slaves will applaud him together - our boyfriend! He can promise anything, and the slaves are happy - we do so too! He is never mistaken, and the slaves are happy - we are special and therefore always right! Ethical marriageables with dignity bear the burden of the main Russian heroes, they are proud of their business and wealth stolen and squeezed out of others, they have special concepts of conscience, they are patriots and spiritual authorities of ethical wars with those who think, baptized, says, and do.

Ethical diagnosis of Russia: immoral bubbles of spiritual greatness (bubble of stupidity) with militant contempt for a person and triumphant marriage. Is there treatment? The international division of labor and new technologies will lead to a change in priorities, the basic element will be normal ethics, which will pull the normative economy in democratic countries, leaving in the tail authoritarian and totalitarian regimes with defective ethics. Therefore, ethical training and change of ethical order in Russia can become an effective medicine. But will the long -suffering people want this? The answer can give a referendum on two pressing issues:

1. Communism and planned economy for Russia "good" (+) or "evil" (-)?

2. Democracy and competitive economy for Russia "good" (+) or "evil" (-)?

It is advisable to conduct such a referendum until the leader’s new elections, but will he decide to change ethical priorities? Let's wait and watch - this is a science.

Georgy Yuryev - an expert on biosocial problems of an individual, doctor of medical sciences, candidate of psychological sciences