Translated material
Amputation of conscience
The heroes of the new network scandal are Vladimir Pozner and Renata Litvinov, sitting on the jury of the TV show "Minute of Glory".
The next participant in the program was the one -legged dancer Evgeny Smirnov. Both Posner and Litvinov voted against his number, while the first called the performance "forbidden reception", and the second simply invited Eugene to "fasten the second leg."
The words of the judges caused a very sharp response.
Litvinova - moral amputant
- heated $ $ for $ Sha (@us_progress) March 6, 2017
Gently. The so -called "elite" in the person of Pozner and Litvinova essentially humiliate the dignity of a person. Hama. All. https://t.co/7gqb39xcxw
- Stalin Sokol (@sokol_stalina) March 8, 2017
Litvinova and Pozner advise fastening additional brains.
- Boris Melkumov (@melkumov_2011) March 7, 2017
It would be possible to give Renate to the festival and Pozner to the heap of the hashtag to give #Litvinov_postrows_father_mputants
- Julia (@julkov007) March 7, 2017
Everything seems to be clear with Pozner, but Litvinova thoroughly disappointed ... #minute
- Inese P. (@your_lovelyhead) March 7, 2017
This is such an understanding of the fight against political correctness. They must be proud of their honesty.
Just do not say that Posner and Litvinova pierced the bottom. In Russia, there is no bottom in principle.
The most amazing (or not) in this plot is that Litvinova is the trustee of the Anton here nearby project and seemed to have heard somewhere about inclusiveness.
Regarding the Renata of Litvinova, who called the participant a minute of fame with an amputated leg "an amputer man."
There, on the show, Renata rotates with his eyes like crazy fish, throws his head almost on the shoulders of the leading neighbors and, therefore, asks the Tanzor participant as follows: “And here you can, fasten the second, it may not be so obviously absent!”
So, in the fact that a person does not have a leg, or a hand, does not have nothing shameful and shameful, so that it must be hidden, "so as not to be so obvious."
But when a person has no talent, like the mediocre Renata Litvinova, it is ashamed, and indeed, it is necessary to fasten the feverish rolling of the eyes, random faith in his head and languid voice so that phenomenal mediocrity could not be so obviously absent. Although, I must admit that a certain ingenuity in order to turn all this cheap performance into a “recognizable manner” is still needed.
In short, in a normal country with this star, the Saratov drama circle would immediately break all possible contracts, and first of all, a contract for the show a minute of fame. And the press would scroll it so that I would have to not only publicly apologize, but also donate a large amount to the disabled support fund.
But we are in Russia, we have spiritual reproaches. Expressed in the fact that behind a long -standing companion of Litvinova’s life, Zemfira, is Abramovich, who pays the studio with an independent singer, expensive cars and other small joys of life. And then the guardians of morality would have already taken up the Renata in full.
Somehow Posner went to the store for vodka, in five. And on the way, the car ran into him with a drunken driver. And his foot was torn off.
Posner's face fell right into the mud, in the slurry, and screams from there:
- Good people! Help someone, call an ambulance urgently!
And they say to him:
“You see, Posner, but there are prohibited techniques.” When it lies, so legless, and presses on pity. And everyone should break and help him. This is very touched by all of us. Sometimes this happens in the cinema when everyone runs and grab him under his arms, stop his blood, apply a tourniquet, shout: “Call someone a doctor urgently! Is there a doctor among you?! Urgently! His leg was torn off! " And all this is a bad tone and non -multiphot. And therefore - no, we will not help you. Sorry, Posner.
And Litvinova also approached, and spat on his stump and laughed terribly. And went on about her business. And so no one helped.
If there were successful handsome men and beauties in the jury, it would really be incomprehensible. And there are screaming either from aversion to life, or from hatred of themselves creatures, clinging to their shame, because there is nothing more to hold on to. It is a pity that killing is a mandatory part of the program for such people.
Why "a minute of fame" is a disgusting shame.
I understand everything, the scriptwriters Litvinova and Pozner assigned the role of evil policemen. And Renata did not come up with anything better than offering a disabled person to "fasten" his leg.
But how can this rubbish can be aired at all? In a country where a disabled person is not so hard to achieve, but often it is unrealistic to leave the house? Only a sick person can come up with speculation on the topic “But is it a disabled person to achieve preferences due to his disability”?
When are you, <The hell, you will understand that people with disabilities are the same members of society who or from birth or as a result of an accident just less fortunate for us? And all they want is to just perceive them with the same members of society?
And to poke a person, “And you, a brother, decided to take dancing to show us our amputated leg and, due to this, achieve success” - this is shame, obscurantism, immaturity of society.
In another country, they would have long been forced to apologize and leave their posts. In our country, this is broadcast on the main channel and rejoice at the ratings.
PS And this guy is definitely not trying to achieve fame "at the expense of an amputated leg." And he had already done such a huge work on himself that he does not care about what Litvinova says.
A guy without a leg is an adult. Before him, Litvinova and Pozner raped his tongues an 8-year-old girl (because she "desecrated" the song of the Great Zemfira)
Russian television, in its current form, does not love, does not love, does not value and does not notice. A person for this television is a point in the ranking, part in the share, something impersonal and despised in view of the meagerness and worthlessness.
People who are chained to the TV, on the contrary, see both strength, and even the truth in television.
All this is terribly aggravated by an endless gap in abundance, the standard of living and, finally, the attitude of those who broadcast from the TV with those who are broadcast.
In 2007, Uncle Sasha Malyutin arrived at the (now extensively discussed) television program "Minute of Glory". He dreamed that his sons were seen and not considered a missing person, he wanted him not to be thrown out of the kindergarten, where he first worked as a musplesman, and then a watchman, he finally tried to show the world his really unique abilities. The graduate of the Altai Muzuchischi, Alexander Malyutin, was seriously worried that life somehow turned out so much that he, the most gifted of classmates, is trained by a virtuoso game in the accordion in the village of Alteskoye, and classmates work in orchestras, some even tour.
Malyutin arrived in Moscow and went on stage of the Great Studio "Minutes of Glory". He played on the piano with his feet, then with his hands, but not for long. The jury, which was Alexander Maslyakov, Tatyana Tolstaya and Yuri Galtsev, very quickly pressed the button and spoke one after another in the spirit that Malyutin played falsely, and indeed, they did not play a piano in a decent society. Returning home, Alexander Malyutin hanged himself.
I was at his home, I saw the village of Altai, a snow cemetery, an indistinguishable grave brought down on the chest, examined his tools and kilometers of video recordings for a trip to Moscow, in Ostankino. All this time I wanted to stop him, grab it by the shoulders and yell: do not go there, no one is waiting for you there, no one needs you there. But there was no one to stop. Malyutin was already dead.
And the program, I look, is alive. Flourishing. And he hones the skill of contempt for people who, for some reason, are not like successful handsome men and beauties from the jury.
I, regardless of the story under discussion, always experienced some awkwardness when I came across this program on TV. I imagined how these provincial for the most part, the guys were killed to flash on the TV for a minute. Listen to something condescending from the jury (whoever sits there). And again disappear in oblivion. Unlike a voice, where, self-asserting himself in a competitive profession, people deliberately go to risks, there was always something defenseless here in the participants. Especially with our gap between the post-voce and the capital. And here - just the quintessence of this television project. It is a pity to people who fall into such a thing.
Cosmopolitan magazine publishes a column of psychologist Daria Yausheva :
To go on stage a person with restrictions is a risk. We, a society that considers ourselves enlightened and is familiar with the concept of “tolerance”, still do not understand what to do with what around us here and there people who want to live not in closed spaces, but in the most ordinary world for us. Most of us notices people with restrictions only on the streets - they ask for alms. The spreading information that the actors are often more widely convinced only convinces us: no one can trust us.
In fact, you can. Thanks to the media, social networks, the development of the NPO network, the capabilities of people cease to be limited, and they declare themselves louder. Among our friends, colleagues, acquaintances are more and more of those who decide to maintain this trend, but all in the same context - providing assistance. We connect auto payments, we are arranged by volunteers to funds. But not always and not everyone needs our help. At a certain moment, a person goes to the stage of adoption of his position, he learns to live fully with the possibilities that he has. And at this stage, it is important for him to obtain a recognition that the absent leg or hand does not make him different, he is only in our head with a mutant. In fact, he is the most ordinary person with the same aspirations and desires, ambitions and willingness to contribute to society as any other.
But we continue to stigmatize. Defending himself from the anxiety that manifests itself inside (“How to react?”, “What will I tell him?”, “What if he is offended?”), We begin to blame the person of putting pressure on us. Although pressure is an inner experience. And it is worth sorting out with yourself: what beliefs give birth to this feeling? A note of doubt can save the situation: are I right, thinking that now they are trying to “divorce” me for pity? And who in this situation turns out to be a victim: a person who complains that they put pressure on him, that he cannot defend himself, or is he who, having overcome fears and risking, comes out on a common basis to get his moment of fame? This sacrificial position is a voluntary matter, I must say. “This is your choice,” Eugene retorted reasonably.
And here is the text of Olga Strachovskaya on "Medusa":
The performance of the pair to the show and the reaction of the jury marked the problem with the inclusive and perception of people with physical characteristics in Russia. People with disabilities are poorly protected, it is difficult for them to adapt in society and find a job, and many do not always understand how to talk about them in order not to offend anyone (and what is important at all). In particular, the video with this episode of the show on the official UTUB channel television shows is called “Disabled without a leg for a minute of fame 2017”-this looks disrespectful of the heroes of the video and people with disabilities in general. There is a problem with their perception by society because of the actual “invisibility” and non-inclusion in the daily lives of people with disabilities. It is no coincidence that both Posner and Litvinova, criticizing the performance of Evgeny Smirnov and Alena Puneva, referred to strong or unbearable emotions that causes a person with disabilities in them.
In the journal Esquire, an open letter to Pozner from producer Sergei Evdokimov:
We somehow did not notice, but over the past fifteen years, television has turned into an instrument of the genocide of one part of the society of another. Not directly, of course, but, as they say, purely symbolically. All these technologies of public trolling, transformation into a show, browing the status that our TV is so proud of - all, in fact, are aimed at the moral suppression of the opponent. You will not have time to crap first, they will talked you. This is most noticeable on different talent shows in which star judges do not so much evaluate performances as they show their star status, hanging labels and condemning the participants. However, in the struggle for embedding in a vertical, part of which is a television vertical (one country, one president, one Alla Pugacheva), all means are good.
It must also be understood that in Russia television performs another function - in fact, the only social elevator accessible to a small person. And for many, the appearance in a television show is the only way to take place in a professional quality. Drinking and ridicuating, we risk putting a cross on the chances of people to break through in this life and declare ourselves.
In general, the indictment is greatly distinguished by Russian TV from many others, and the rhetoric of television refereeing is more reminiscent of the Stalin Troika than a professional examination. And you can’t get anywhere from this-the culture of condemnation accompanies us from childhood through constant pulling by parents and educators to school and adulthood, as if we were guilty by default, at least the fact of the birth. Didactivity, moralizing, negativity in the assessment-from a dramatic chip (must be both a bad and a good investigator according to the scenario) at some point turned into a way of symbolic castration of his neighbor: God forbid, he will claim the place that I occupy.
This is the lack of empathy - the main problems of Russian TV at the moment. Throughout the world, talents show are conceived as projects that are designed to support the national spirit and personal initiative, to show that if you work on ourselves, then dreams come true, that we are all people and at any moment are ready to come to the rescue and support each other, it is not important whether you are a star or not. Remembering the sobbing child against the backdrop of a dazzling cold Renata Litvinova, or a one-legged dancer against the backdrop of a frowning Posner, or the former children's ombudsman Astakhov, who had a girl who almost drowned in the Karelian lake, whether they swam well, you understand that something went wrong with us.
Maxim Fadeev speaks on the Life website:
Until recently, I considered Vladimir Pozner to be an outstanding journalist, the brightest representative of his profession, one of the best interviewers in Russia. But today I see a man who attacked the child with his cruel statements and with an absolutely cold heart. But I already spoke about this in my Instagram, I will not repeat myself. Well, after Zhenya’s number, he suggested that his performance is a speculation on people's pity. Do I understand correctly that Mr. Posner is against the participation of people with any form of disability in any TV competitions? Should access there should be closed as lepered? And as if there are no them? But after all, on the same First Channel, the audience proved its tolerance, voting for the participant of the third season of the show "Voice. Children".
In my first Life column, I want to especially focus on the “Minutes of Glory” sitting in the jury of Renate Litvinova. Let me remind you that she called Zhenya an amputant and, looking for him with a directorial look, advised him to fasten a prosthesis, with which his disability would not be so obvious. The term "amputant" really exists, but, for example, if such a replica sounded on the air of any American TV show (and Pozner is very well known), then the talker immediately went to court and paid a fine for public insulting and humiliating a person. And as a maximum of several thousand people would have gathered for a demonstration, and the revenge of the talker for a month of Manhattan’s sidewalks, and in the future this person would threaten real social isolation - from the inability to get a job to the loss of a circle of friends.
Few and very cautious attempts to intercede or try to understand.
The story with Pozner and Litvinova, it seems to me, is an example of an insoluble ethical task. I would not find a solution. But he certainly would not say the word "amputant" and certainly would not throw "shit" into Pozner. At least about this.
Or, more often, the proposals do not respond to television scandals.
The intelligent audience suddenly learned that the presenters rose to the participants on the “Minute of Glory” television show. Crying, groan and indignation are on the entire Internet. How can they! ..
Many discoveries are waiting for an intelligent audience in the magical world of television.
In vain they generally climbed there. One has only to start - they will not get out. They still haven't seen Malakhov. Or Gordon. And there is such ...
By the way, there is really hton there. Forever crashed into memory, how they rolled out an armless -busy disabled person who came to transfer for help - and Gordon with a sympathetic look, but strictly addresses his first question:
- Well, Ivan Ivanovich, tell us frankly: I suppose that twenty years ago, on a drunken business, they froze their hand and both legs?
Since everyone around them says and write about the scandal around the television show, I decided to see what the artist from the jury said there, but very quickly turned off the video, because all this is ugly and unpleasant.
But the main thing here is completely different, it seems to me.
Adults should still understand where exactly they are going. Ни для кого ведь не секрет, что на воровской хате обычного человека могут ограбить, в борделе — заразить, в наркопритоне — убить. А на современном российском телевидении — растоптать. Оно сейчас в основном под это и заточено, да и его аудитория за долгие годы воспитана так, что ей по кайфу наблюдать, как оскорбляют и унижают тех, кто пробрался на экран.
Просто не надо туда ходить.
Доносятся какие-то страсти про "Первый канал".
Их там всех спасёт пара фугасных бомб. Тогда все будут скорбеть и их жалеть.
Темы для сюжетов- классика подобных шоу. Ребенок поет взрослую песню, простоватые зрители хватаются за сердце, к горлу подкатывает ком. В нашем случае режиссеры добавили пикантности, маленькая девочка в очках (такие вызывают жалость, известный приём) поёт песню Земфиры, в нарезке пускают видео с концерта певицы, где за кулисами стоит Литвинова, Михаил Боярский (он ведущий этой передачи, тысяча чертей) доверительно сообщает зрителям, что по слухам, Земфира посвятила эту песню Ренате.
И тут вместо ожидаемых розовых соплей на тему чистой души ребенка и родника его таланта раздается голос разума: Рената и Познер говорят о том, что вообще, по совести говоря, это полный отстой, когда детей заставляют петь песни, смысл которых они не понимают, что это всё долбаное тщеславие и амбиции их недалеких родителей. И вроде тут даже какой-то постмодернизм начинается, в телешоу начинают ругать каноны этого же телешоу. Налицо игра на эмоциях - сначала зрителя растрогали, потом окатили холодным душем критики жестокого жюри, и тут у человека начинает бомбить, ведь, как так, ребенка обидели, уроды, и зритель идет писать о своих уникальных переживаниях в соцсети на радость маркетологам первого канала.
Скандал ожидаем и срежисирован - намёк на интимную связь между Ренатой и Земфирой, срыв покровов с истинных мотивов таких выступлений, посреди всего этого стоит маленькая девочка в белых колготках и плачет настоящими детскими слезами, камера крупным планом их показывает, потом отъезжает и мы видим, как она, совсем малышка в своих смешных очках, стоит на огромной сцене, её душат рыдания, а ей никуда не деться и не спрятаться, а суровые бездшуные взрослые разносят её в пух и прах, фоном играет надрывная музыка Земфиры (кумира нашего, между прочим, поколения), и вишенка на этом медийном торте - смешной Боярский в модных очках с фиолетовыми стеклами. Ну, гениально, чё. Хорошо поработали.
Второй скандальный эпизод выстроен ровно по тем же лекалам, только там тригер другой - обидели не ребёнка, а человека с инвалидностью. Литвинова там говорит танцору "Пристегните что-ли ногу" - и вот эти спорные, сомнительные, мягко говоря, слова, их же не вырезали при монтаже, на них же вся ставка, которая блестяще сыграла, и только ленивый не возмутился.
Зачем же вы, дорогие мои соотечественники, ведетесь на это, как татарская бабушка?
Поразительно, но даже в моей фб-ленте попадаются посты, посвященные программе "Минута славы".
Говорят, там Рената Литвинова унижает детей и инвалидов.
Не буду долго рассуждать о том, что все эти скандалы наверняка прописаны в сценарии и призваны повысить интерес публики к эфиру "Первого канала".
Скажу более страшную вещь. Ведущим "Минуты славы" в этом сезоне является Михаил Боярский. Вот где ужас-то .
- первый канал сообщает о том, что нашел способ монетизировать свой контент в интернете.
- спустя месяц все в интернете смотрят и обсуждают одно за другим шоу первого канала во всех интернет-каналах доставки.
Вы не смотрите телевизор? Так он пришел к вам.
Между тем, телеканал не прошёл мимо этой ситуации, провёл внутреннее расследование и... уволил одного из редакторов!
За тупые высказывания Литвиновой с Познером уволены не Литвинова с Познером, а сотрудник "Первого", обязанный вырезать подобные глупости.
— Филипп Масловский (@soulstray) 7 марта 2017 г.
Оскорбляли Познер и Литвинова, а уволили редактора. Как обычно https://t.co/Ydxv6PcFhr
— La Russie parle (@Russia_calls) 7 марта 2017 г.
-
Ivan Belyaev
Social Networks Editor Radio Liberty
-
Alya Ponomareva
Social Networks Editor Radio Liberty