
"The Governor of Crimea Aksenov invited the monarchy in Russia the day before yesterday. I don’t even understand what was the matter - or something, in the Crimea is some kind of particular monarchical? We had a little Natalia Poklonskaya with her love for the last king - so now the former Crimean Brigadier nicknamed Goblin joined!" - writes a social psychologist in "Live Journal"
“However, with Aksenov it is clear-I have long noticed that among the bandits there are somehow a lot of fans of the monarchy. Why would there be some kind of connection between“ concepts ”and a tendency to subordinate“ king-priest ”? Probably, there are clearly anti-democratic ones: they mean that there are“ cattle ”(fraer, which have no voting right at all; “Nobility” (thieves, tramps) - which, in fact, rule everyone, and there is a rigid hierarchy and “title” like “Baron”, “Count” - that is, “Thief in the Law”, “Torpedoes”, etc.
In general, “concepts” (by which all Russian society actually lives) - this is such a “overturned down” feudalism, and with such an extremely characteristic feature for feudalism, as a denial of private property, in any case, its absolute nature.
The conclusion, in general, is this: people with concepts, if they minimally try to apply their standards to the usual political sphere, should just include to the monarchy, as the "conceptual" social system. So everything is logical.
The real “thieves” is never able to understand - with what on earth and fraer should some rights to intervene in the “graters” of “serious boys” should receive. This is for the thieves "some kind of nonsense." Therefore, democracy of the thieves world, in essence, is hostile (although it is ready to adapt to it, of course). But the autocracy for the thieves - as for an ordinary official - the most. Therefore, attempts to "push" him in this bureaucratic feudalism will only increase. Goblin and Poklonskaya - only the first swallows.
Future storm ".