Lovers of shocks against human rights activists: the Ministry of Internal Affairs refused me to visit Chelyabinsk

Fans of shocks: the Ministry of Internal Affairs refused to visit the IVSA and the special receiver in Chelyabinsk.

Adviser to the President of the Russian Federation,
Chairman of the Development Council
civil society and human rights
Under the President of the Russian Federation
M.A. Fedotov

Dear Mikhail Alexandrovich!

On March 17, 2017, a letter to the State Unitary Enterprise of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Lieutenant General Yu.K., was sent to the council. Valeeva about the refusal to visit places of forced content of the Chelyabinsk region.

As a justification for the refusal, the allegedly committed violations were given when visiting places of forced content of the Sverdlovsk region and Karelia:

- So, in February 2017, when I was visiting the Central Department Store in the Republic of Karelia, I asked “not quite correct questions about the conditions of detention in the FSIN institutions,” which caused the conflict between 2 previously convicted persons;

- In the TsVSNP, my adolescents about the reasons for visiting in this institution caused embarrassment and a sense of discomfort, while one of them required the help of a full -time psychologist;

- In the TsVSIG of Yekaterinburg, I “made peremptory conclusions about illegality ... Premises to the center” of expelled foreign citizens, which became the “indirect cause” of destabilization of the situation in the center on August 23, 2017.

I believe that in this case, on the part of the author, there is an attempt to change the cause and investigation, to put the situation from the sore head to a healthy place.

So, in the chamber of TsVSIGG. Petrozavodsk I asked the persons who were released there about the conditions of detention in the FCU IR No. 7. They asked 19 questions about nutrition, the quality of medical care, the unlawful use of physical strength, the daily routine, transfer from one detachment to another. During the survey, it turned out that one of the liberated was the object of persecution by the so -called The “asset” existing in this colony, and the other in such an asset consisted. The verbal conflict that arose between them (which took place on this basis earlier) was not related to my issues, but with human rights violations in the FCU IK No. 7, and unprofessionalism of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, which have placed conflicts objectively. I drew the attention of the representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation to this, but he did not draw the proper conclusions, misinformed the leadership of the ministry.

In the CVPNP for children-commissioners, all children receive qualified assistance to the full-time psychologist of the center. When visiting the center, I asked the children about what are the reasons for their entry into the center and what they need to do not to get there again, but the representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia did not let them answer this question and began to tell them about how he was engaged in football in his youth. I tactfully said that I hit the representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, after which he tried to create a conflict situation and make me a remark that I asked the guys about what they had done (in fact, the question sounded “how did you get here and what should you change in yourself in order to prevent offenses?”). Within half an hour that we were in the center after that, the children we talked with, did their own business and did not go to the psychologist.

In the TsVSIG of the Central Internal Affairs Directorate in the Sverdlovsk Territory, a significant improvement in human rights under the new administration of the Center was discovered. At the same time, complaints about the quality of food, the failure of the ball in the walking courtyard, the non -ordering of dental care, the illegal expulsion of citizens with close relatives from among Russians were received. The case of the expulsion of the Russian citizen oglu Vasily Mikhailovich, born in 1987, the native of Russia, G. N. Tagil, who lived with his parents in Kazakhstan from 1988 to 1990-91, after which, after which he lived in Russia, where he lived without traveling beyond it, studied at the school of N. Tagil, received medical assistance in the clinic in the clinic in the clinic in the clinic in the clinic in the clinic in the clinic in the clinic in the clinic at the school. residence; In January 2017, he was released from IR No. 5 G. N. Tagil. When studying the decisions, I pointed out some expelled to the fact that they need to file a complaint against the decision, indicating that the decision is illegal, since it violates Art. Art. 7 and 38 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Art. 8 of the Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. I am convinced that the consultations about the illegality of their decisions that were expelled by me could not lead to the unrest in the center 5 days after my departure.

I would consider it necessary:
1) carefully study the practice of compliance with human rights in places of forced content of the Chelyabinsk region, if the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia is there, what to hide.

2) it is more rigid to raise the question of the suppression of violations identified in the places of compulsory content before the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.

3) to offer the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs when visiting such places to send employees who have a positive experience of interacting with the HRCs, not prone to intrigue, distortion, fantasy.

4) invite the author an answer to meet with me with your participation.

A.V. Babushkin

Original