Translated material
Not the most honest rules
The viral video about illiterate youth is Fake, says one of the participants in the survey
A week ago, a video of the survey on the knowledge of Russian culture was widely dispersed on the network, from which we could conclude: the current youth is extremely ignorant.
Many popular bloggers shared the video, collecting a huge harvest of likes and outraged comments. Most of the responses looked something like this:
Young, beautiful and completely uneducated. There is no elementary knowledge at the simplest household level. This is some kind of disaster.
There were, however, sympathetic comments. Someone suggested that modern youth did not need to remember what you can look for in Google, and someone-that students could just get lost in front of the camera. Many wrote that they did not see anything shameful in not remembering the answers to questions sounding in the video.
The young man cannot continue the line "I love my homeland, but ...". The young man is an electrician. I only know from the electrician area that if you insert my fingers into the outlet, it will hit the current. To become an electrician, you need to master the school course of physics well. To continue the line “I love my homeland, but ...”, you don’t need to master anything, just hear a vulgar toast on some provincial feast. And who should neighing over whom?
However, he truly launched the course of the discussion of the story of the survey participants about how her answers were shot-and what remained of them after the work of the installer. In a long post, which should be read to the end, she states that the survey was allegedly removed for the Channel One, but was later used at the conference of the Minister of Culture Vladimir Medinsky with bloggers to demonstrate a lack of knowledge among young people.
If this story was real, it would seem too fantastic. I beg you to read to the end, it was not possible to express it briefly. The conclusions, I think, will make everyone himself.
In December, I walked in Gum with my friend. The woman pleasant in appearance approached us and asked if we would not want to take part in the survey for Channel One - only a couple of questions about Russian culture. We were in a good mood, in no hurry, we decided to participate.
The woman led us to the second floor of the shopping center, where there were already two cameras and a team of 5 people. They had white-blue clothes, the emblems of the first television channel. We were slightly embarrassed, but we were assured that there would be nothing complicated, they are preparing an entertainment program about culture, relax, laugh and answer a joke.
There were about 30 questions, the woman read them from the sheet. They were different: primitive (“name the work of Tolstoy”), with a catch (“in which hand Lermontov held a swip on a duel” - obviously, in any) and rather difficult (“name the members of a“ mighty pile ”or“ where the monument to Krylov is located ”).
We answered almost everything - maybe, with the exception of five. I asked the operator where it would be possible to see the result - he took my number, said that he would send a link to WhatsApp (of course, I never received it).
Over the next month, my friend and I tried to find a “program about culture” on the Channel One website, but in vain.
I would never have thought that everything would work out as it happened. March has come, I am on the training outside the Russian Federation. Suddenly a message came from a friend with reference to YouTube: “Natasha, you are at Sobolev on the channel!”
By the link, I found a video blog with the name “Bloggers by the Minister of Culture” and did not immediately understand what I have to do with this. Judging by what this young man says - on March 9, a conference of the Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation Vladimir Rostislavovich Medinsky with popular video bloggers of Russia was held. It was discussed how you can interest young people in the culture and history of Russia. A video with a survey was used as an example of the non -education of the young generation.
Next, Nikolai Sobolev inserted excerpts of this video into his video, trying to cover the faces of the responsible ones. Name, age, faculty - everything is signed. The faces are recognizable.
It is worth noting that the entire episode was shot by Nikolai in a derogatory form.
I think everyone will decide for himself how offensive it is, here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofg8tbgifpk&feature=youtu.be
And yes, this video has 1.8 million (!) Views and 19,329 comments. But that's not all.
At home, I decided to find a video of the survey itself on the network, which was demonstrated at a conference by the minister and partially used Nikolai. I found him on Orthodoxy.ru .
In the poll video, I answer three times:
I continue the first lines from Evgeny Onegin: the second line, which I called correctly, was cut, the third forgot, the fourth redid it as a joke.
To the question "Who is the author of" demons? " I am in a striking way I could not give an answer, and only mumbled and repeated "oh-oh, now, umm." This part was cut out and inserted from another answer.
On the third question “Continue the phrase“ All families are happy the same ... ”I gave a true but inaccurate answer, laughed and said“ something like that. ” By the way, the very beginning of this phrase used in the issue of a journalist, inaccurately repeats the original Lev Nikolaevich. This episode was included in the video to show the frivolity of the attitude of youth to culture.
Many, perhaps, have already seen him on Facebook - a male voice behind the scenes asks simple questions about Russian culture and history, young people on the street answer. More precisely, they try to answer, showing ignorance of "capital truths." Unfortunately, I was one of the respondents, and I can assure: this is installation.
As it turned out, the Pravoslavie.ru website also posts a whole article by the editor -in -chief of the site of Bishop Yegoryevsky Tikhon (Shevkunova), who took part in the Conference of the Minister of Culture with bloggers.
The article itself is amazing, I will only give a few quotes and indicate the link.
“The interview that you saw at our request conducted two well -known television companies Red Square and Workshop, whose correspondents interviewed university students and youth with higher education. The presented is by no means a sample of the worst answers. ”
“When preparing for the publication, this video, we first wanted to hide the faces of young people. But then they decided to leave everything as it is. ”
“The incident can be found many reasons-from the influence of the Internet, unprofessionalism and negligence of reforming officials to the intrigues of liberals and the machinations of the West. You can very convincingly explain why everything happened that way. But the essence of the matter will not change from this: our generation, obviously, did not fulfill its duty in relation to those to whom we will pass on to Russia, here to these guys from the screen. ”
Link to the article with the video: http://www.pravoslavie.ru/101853.html
The poll video has become a viral on Facebook. From the page Pravoslavie.ru shared them 656 times. It was published by Rustem Adagamov - 1.3 thousand likes, 879 reposts. And 300+ comments, the bulk of which offends the surveyed young people, including me. This video raises doubts from the minority of users, the rest immediately hang up labels and humiliate - not all generation, but specific people who gave interviews. I happened to read more than 500 comments of this kind:
Watch sickening, morons ... "
"What a squalor!"
“It was painful to watch this shame. No matter how anyone tried to fragrance of this chronic stupidity on both hemispheres, there is no excuse for such a lowest level of culture. An explanation is, but there is no excuse and cannot be. Select diplomas and certificates, return to schools .... and then shoot! ”
“Absolute stupidity in everything and this is sad, very sad. Amorphous mass. "
"Rastens."
"Fun, with laughter," like coolnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ava
"Without history, without a tribe, without brains ..."
According to Article 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation
1. A citizen has the right to require the court to refute the honor, dignity or business reputation of information if the disseminating such information does not prove that they are true. The refutation should be made in the same way that extended information about the citizen, or in another similar way.
9. A citizen in respect of whom the information defended by his honor, dignity or business reputation is extended, along with the refutation of such information or the publication of his response, has the right to require compensation for losses and compensation for moral damage caused by the spread of such information.
The Law of the Russian Federation "On Mass Media":
Article 51. The inadmissibility of the abuse of the rights of a journalist
It is forbidden to use the right of the journalist to disseminate information in order to discredit a citizen or certain categories of citizens solely on the grounds of gender, age, racial or national affiliation, language, attitude to religion, profession, place of residence and work, as well as in connection with their political beliefs.
Almost 2 million people watched the video by Nikolai Sobolev, read the article by Bishop Yegoryevsky Tikhon, shared a video of the survey on their pages, created with the aim of discrosing “certain categories of citizens on the grounds of age” and defaming the honor and dignity of me and other survey participants.
By whom and how was the video mounted?
How did it get out of the Archives Channel One (or television companies “Red Square” and “Workshop” that pretended to be the first channel) to the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation ?
Why was my personal information widespread without my consent, and according to what law the video blogger Nikolai Sobolev and Pravoslavie.ru have the right to use and distribute this video?
I think the court will figure it out.
Many of the commentators who shaved the videos were ashamed and either removed it, or called for the story of the survey participants wider.
Wow, wow. I also shaved this video, it was, but I usually don’t do it - I pecked, in short, at the bait. I bring Natalya my sincere apologies. I don’t know what is with other respondents, but most likely the situation is similar. And after all, I thought that you really have a fig to be linked (well, that is, everyone can, of course, but they spend more time on someone). Authors - <freaks ".
I recently posted a video as people cannot answer elementary questions. Read how it was done.
This is a good lesson - not to post "shocking" facts that humiliate anyone. I deleted this video at home.
It seems to me that it will be fair if this post disperses about the same circulation and receives exactly the same resonance as the notorious video, which, as soon as they did not comment on, what spears only about the “stupidity”, “grayness” and “impassable” generation of the Zuckerberg reality were not broken. And they were deafened, and they laughed and laughed, and laughed and laughed, and laughed and laughed, and laughed and laughed and laughed. sobbed.
The Ministry of Culture, the Media and the Russian Orthodox Church, of course, is well done, to say. The handsome men are simple! They drove the last nail into the coffin, which is trusted by these wonderful, smart, free, greedy to the new, who believe in the mercy and justice of children, will finally bury. And right to you. You have already finally lost this generation.
Commentators remembered that they were not so dense, and wondered why state channels support and broadcast such a distorted version of reality. However, the answer to this question is already known to many.
I remember that once we shot a video on Pushkin’s birthday. People were asked: "What is the day today?", "Do you remember the works," and so on. People recalled and what day and poems they read. Not only about "Lukomorye", by the way.
So. Why am I? I often had a sensation, looking at all sorts of questionnaires on the topic “Check your erudition” that all this is a pink.
Because in my circle of communication on a list of frequently asked questions in such videos, people, for the most part, know answers. And not to say that all my friends are academicians.
If the story of my namesake is true, then this is ̶n̶e̶p̶e̶ch̶n̶n̶ ̶ ̶s̶l̶o̶o̶, comrades!
Do we prove the stupidity of nation based on fake research? Oh, it seems, I hear the mice are scraping at the bottom.
I am very glad that they wrote about it. And I recommend it to everyone from the heart.
And please pay attention to the syllable of our "stupid" youth.
Well, naturally. It is simply beneficial for them to show the plot again and again, "Our people - an illiterate fool, does not know a damn thing, without the authorities will immediately disappear." The main federal channels literally have this their (lowered from above) task.
About where the video "Youth does not know Pushkin" comes from. Dear comrades, we must understand that this is a whole industry, and we are faced with its products every day. And noble Armenian named after Radulova, feeding the free bread of the ungrateful Russian morons, and the "shocking experiment: no one helped a person who fell on the street!" - All this is from there. The operation "Bukhanka" is the most primitive technology, although I have almost a third of the tape in it today, and my tape is about the best people of both hemispheres. For the public, there are more complicated things to be more complicated: for example, a Norwegian study that people with a high IQ multiply poorly, so the average intellect of mankind is steadily declining. But we will not climb into such jungle of information technologies, we would have to deal with the basic technique "In Ryazan, the woman gave birth to a pig! This country is doomed!" Nothing is so well sold in Russia as Russophobia (which in itself is not new). But it is important to remember that there is only one instance interested in the manufacture and distribution of this type of content, and this is the state. The reasons are too obvious to list them, I even had a whole lecture on this subject. "Zombie-state" is called. Therefore, the next time you see something so extremely expressive, believable, I read and immediately believed, and inside I felt the pleasant warmth of my own superiority over the fellow citizens and degrading humanity as a whole - say to yourself the codes "Channel One" (the name is conditionally, you can choose another code - "Dmitry Kiselev", for example). And then click where you are closing.
In my opinion, a much greater crime against science and education is that the Minister of Culture and the Doctor of Historical Sciences states that the criterion of the scientific work of historical labor is compliance with the state interests of the country, and not that 5 students cannot remember the members of the mighty pile and quote Anna Karenina (I also can’t, by the way. And I know much more. :) It would be interesting to do at least the correspondents themselves. school level of knowledge of history ...
Amazing! How wonderful such videos work for supporters of the iron curtain and "the best in the world of Soviet education." And this stereotype is always very zealously supported by those who have received education in the USSR and reckoning themselves to this empire. However, in the end, this is just an established opinion, because If we talk with those who studied in the USSR but not remaining in science or culture, their level of knowledge will be even worse than the current schoolchildren. I remember this phrase about happy and unhappy families, but I have not read Anna Karenina, and can knowledge of cliches and phraseological units determine the "culture" of a person?
Only now I looked at this video - there they are not so terribly handed over, in general there is nothing wrong.
As far as I understood the author, the creators of the “program” with all their might tried to mount the answers so that the responding (mainly correctly) as a result looked like the wrongs and giggling morons; So if it turned out “it's okay”, this is not their fault, just the audience was too educated, but they were too lazy to look for real stupares, and it would have turned out to be not a mild ...
For many, the post has become an occasion to think what the current television journalism has turned into.
A great illustration of the level of professionalism and ethics of modern TV. This is so, for the future, about the benefits of critical thinking. This video gained a huge number of views and indignant intellectual comments. After all, an uneducated person will not be indignant, he himself does not remember who wrote demons.
Once I worked in a collective farm getting up from my knees, where journalists and television regularly came. He was present in an interview with the authorities, and he himself gave them several times. And then I read and looked. And <water was stunned>.
<wittering> from misunderstanding: why do they need this. Why unfold the meaning of the answers of 180 degrees? Not a single published interview was even close in meaning to the original.
I think if you take 100% of journalists and send to master the land of Franz Joseph, the rest of the people will live better. I'm absolutely serious now.
A powerful story.
Horror, the prestige of the journalist’s work falls, why would it be.
"All of the above will be used against you."
Never talk with employees of state and air -state television channels and other media. All your words will be turned out, the frames are shifted, and if you were asked to smile, they will show the whole world how the "fool is crawling" in the appropriate video department. No contacts. The issue of epidemic security ..
It is better to kiss a tuberculosis tramp than to communicate - in any form and on any topic - with "journalists" of our guest evidence. A much less dangerous and nasty activity.
Первый канал от опроса открестился, сообщает радиостанция "Говорит Москва" :
«Первый канал не снимал, не заказывал, не показывал этот ролик в эфире и не планирует. Мы не имеем к этому опросу никакого отношения и о его существовании узнали вчера из интернета», - сообщила на запрос радиостанции Лариса Крымова, руководитель дирекции общественных связей Первого канала.
Кто-то, впрочем, обвиняет в предвзятости скорее православную церковь, напоминая, что опрос был заказан и смонтирован для сайта Pravoslavie.ru .
Как же задолбали уже эти фальсификации и подтасовки фактов со стороны "духовных лиц", с прицелом наложить лапу на всю систему образования(((
Отмечают комментаторы и то, как легко распространить любые подтасовки в Сети – яркими историями, вызывающими эмоциональный отклик, люди готовы делиться независимо от их правдивости.
Ужас в том, что это абсолютно типичная ситуация. И дело не в Православии или Министерстве. Это происходит со всем теликом: вырезать самое жирное. И с большинством интервью – нужно же, чтобы интервью было "интересным" и читаемым. И дело в том, как люди делают перепосты информации и разгоняются над весьма конкретными, живыми людьми, потому что в их сознании это не люди, а какие-то "персонажи". Дело вообще не в политике, дело, в целом, в дикости того, как мы сейчас готовы воспринимать и распространять информацию.
-
Alya Ponomareva
Social Networks Editor Radio Liberty