Do not leave the escaped

There are enemies, but there are traitors. You can agree with enemies, traitors must be destroyed. The wording in its own way is impeccable and extremely intelligible, it reflects the system of values ​​of the professional spy, for whom the renegat is more hated by the enemy. For the enemy - he is the enemy, this is a foreigner in the service of his state. The enemy is supposed to fight you, he fulfills the order. The defector is his own, which changes the oath and substitutes the spy.

Without a doubt, Denis Voronenkov was a traitor for the Russian authorities and personally for Putin, and the point here is not even that he spoke there in numerous interviews about the distraught country and the future change of regime. Or what information was shared about Yanukovych. Russia is methodically driving crazy, this is an important part of the propaganda special operation, but it is no secret to anyone, and the charges made in Kyiv against the ex-president of Ukraine are hardly very disturbing anyone in Moscow. Much more important than another.

He requested shelters in a neighboring country, began to testify and speak with brutal anti -Putin speeches by a person who personified the current political system. One way or another related to the special services. Having built his life, business, useful acquaintances in full accordance with the norms adopted in modern Russia. Always voting as it should and said what was supposed to be. This is not Harry Kasparov or Ilya Ponomarev, who do not hide his beliefs. And not even Litvinenko, who was a romantic and believed that the Chekists should not earn extra money to the killers.

Denis Voronenkov was not a romantic. That is why the escape of the ex-deputy, who consisted of the Communist Party of the Communist Party in the "opposition" faction, was an event of truly sensational and stunned power. It’s like if the whole “United Russia”, or let the LDPR, having chosen freedom, moved to Kyiv and began methodical denunciations of the bloody regime. Of course, it cannot be said that in the Kremlin they directly recklessly believe in their deduced elites, but still negative selection was carried out there with all scrupulousness, and there is no reason to concern. Voronenkov’s example showed that this is not so. He set a very bad example.

There are enemies, but there are traitors, and they must be killed not only because they have moved to the side of the enemy, but also from pure pragmatism. From a sense of self -preservation. So that others are disgusting. Thus, spies think, and if they come to power, forming an unprecedented state, pierced by people with a special warehouse, then active events become part of state policy.

Sometimes these are secret actions, and only an annoying accident allows us to establish that in the center of the European capital, a murder was committed with the use of Polonia. But it also happens that for educational purposes, for the total intimidation of everyone who could at least stir the thought of treason and escape, it is useful to bang a person in broad daylight and with great noise. Arranging a indicative execution again in the center of the European capital. At the same time, guessing that you will not hesitate everyone, and looking around around with longing: who will tell and what will he tell when he leaves?

In the end, the main fault of the deceased in the that was the fact that he caused the severe trauma to the russia manager of Russia. It turned out, if Voronenkov escaped, then everyone can betray. Any folk chosen one, a friend of Surkov, a friend of Naryshkina, an old friend is scary to say someone. Any carrier of secrets - genuine or invented.

Another question is, to whom from such murderous events the benefits of the long term.

Take the same deputies or other representatives of the elite breed of Russian citizens. Breaking is a strong suppression weapon, but also double -edged. The trouble is not even that it will now be more reliable. The trouble is that the atmosphere in the notorious elite circles will change irreparably. Today they execute a real fugitive-representative, and tomorrow the elimination of potential traitors will become an effective means of survival and career growth in the boss and from a denunciation, supposedly false, no one will be insured. With the exception of the national leader. Today, some stunned NOD or praise of extrajudicial reprisals Chaplin is more or less marginal phenomena, under the control of special services or completely untied, and tomorrow is ideology, as has already happened in Russian history.

Today, deputies exhausting from devotion to the Kremlin are stamping the deceased Voronenkov, and tomorrow, without guilt, the guilty will go (at best) to settle the Lefortovo camera. Paranoia on a state scale is not just a disease, but a logical consequence of a certain political course in an unprecedented country. Well, the reputation of such a state, of course, reaches the bottom.

In this sense, on the move, rumors launched in Moscow about the involvement of the SBU in the murder of Voronenkov and the "sacred victim" cause the opposite effect. That is, everything, of course, happens, and we can also assume that the ex-deputy was ordered by the leadership of the DPR-LNR-in the framework of, for example, asymmetric retaliation for Givi and Motorola. But after all, the Donbass today, as they say, Nashenskaya, and in general, somehow it is very difficult. Exotic somehow. Despite the fact that we have long known how to Vladimir Vladimirovich the enemy Miley the traitor and how to do each of them. And if a person lies in a pool of blood, then there is no doubt: this is not an enemy.

The circuit is primitive, but it convinces. And the murder of Denis Voronenkov fits into her impeccably, like a bullet in the head. Almost leaving no room for doubt and painful thoughts about who else could put him to death and carry out this sentence.