Translated material
Drawer commission
The investigation repeatedly detained the teacher of mathematics of the Moscow Financial and Legal Academy Dmitry Bogatov, the application for which the Presnensky district court of Moscow rejected the day before. It is reported by "Medusa" with reference to his parents. Bogatov is now charged with an article on public calls for terrorism.
The man is still in the temporary maintenance of the Moscow Central Internal Affairs Directorate of Moscow on Petrovka.
Lawyer Alexei Teptsov told BFM that after the court of Bogatov was taken to the IVS. There they had to take the subscription about the non -giving and release him. However, at night the lawyer was unexpectedly called in the TFR. “The investigator called me and invited Moscow to the building of the Moscow Civil Aud for Novokuznetskaya Street for urgent verification measures under article 205.2 of the Criminal Code (public calls for terrorist activities or public justification of terrorism),” he noted that the materials under this article were allocated from the case of mass rays on April 2 (part 3 of Article 212). Bogatov did not manage to become the accused.
Teptsov believes that after Bogatov will take explanations, investigators will institute criminal proceedings already under Article 205.2, which provides for up to seven years in prison. “In theory, the case under this article should be aroused already on other events. However, I do not exclude that the investigators decided to look at the same event from a different angle,” the lawyer noted. “I am fully admitted that Bogatov will be detained under a new article, and investigators will go to court with a new petition to conclude him in abundance.” Teptsov called such a tactic "worked out by the investigating organs."
On Saturday afternoon, the judge of the Presnensky district court of Moscow Evgeny Naydenov satisfied the defense petition and extended to 72 hours of the detention of Bogatov. Lawyers asked to provide time to familiarize themselves with the case materials, provide evidence of the non -investigation of the client to the crime incriminated to him, as well as the additional characteristics of his personality. By a court decision, the investigation of the investigation to arrest will be considered on Monday at 17:00.
On Wednesday at about 22:00, employees of the Moscow Department of the Investigative Committee and Police came to the apartment of 25-year-old Bogatov on Ostrovitanov Street. Until about two in the morning, they searched. All electronic information carriers were seized from Bogatov. On Thursday, the press service of the Investigative Committee announced the detention of a man who posted on the Internet calls to go on April 2 to protest in the center of Moscow. The name of the suspect under Part 3 of Article 212 of the Criminal Code (calls for riots) was not reported. In the TFR, it was noted that to conceal his location, the detainee used anonymization agents.
On Friday, the judge Naydenov refused to satisfy the petition of the investigation about Bogatov’s placement in custody. "I have not committed the crimes attributed, I do not intend to hide from the bodies of justice," Bogatov said at the hearing. The defense believes that someone else could use his IP address.
As the investigator noted at a court hearing, now employees of the Investigative Committee are examining the equipment seized in the apartment of Bogatov. “The charges are planned after inspection of the technique,” he said.
Last week, calls began to appear in social networks for holding shares on April 2 in the center of Moscow. In particular, in the public prosecutor blocked at the request of the Prosecutor General’s Office, “we demand systemic changes in the country” called for a rally on Red Square. Among the requirements proposed by the organizers are the resignation of Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, ensuring a constant dialogue between the authorities and citizens, a reduction in defense costs, and the abolition of the Yarovaya Law.
Who exactly called for the action is unknown. The pages on which the calls were published were recently opened and did not contain any personal information. The photos posted on them are taken from the Internet.
On March 31, the Prosecutor General’s Office sent to Roskomnadzor the requirement to block several Internet resources with calls to reach the action on April 2. In the letter of the department, two publics on the VKontakte social network, a post in a living magazine and two videos on YouTube were mentioned.
The Prosecutor General’s Office noted that the authorities did not receive notifications of the action on April 2. It is possible to call for participation in a mass event and campaigning only after submitting a notification, and since it was not there, it is said in a letter, the information on the pages listed in the letter should be considered as containing calls to riots, extremist activities and to participate in measures "conducted in violation of the established procedure."
On April 1, the Moscow Directorate of the Investigative Committee opened a criminal case of calls for riots in the capital. "According to the investigation, on March 29, 2017, on the Internet, that is, in the public domain for an unlimited circle of persons, an unidentified person under the pseudonym posted text messages calling for actions of an extremely extremist, measures are taken to establish persons who posted calls for criminal actions," the press service of the department reported.
On Sunday, at least 59 activists were detained in Moscow ( 
Activists Ildar Dadin, Sergey Rangi, Julia Assumption, investigators handed the subpoenas to the Investigative Committee . They drew up protocols under part 5 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violation by the participant in the public event of the established procedure for holding a meeting, rally), the remaining activists from the Tverskaya police department were released without protocols. At the same time, investigators of the Investigative Committee of the Investigative Committee of the Recently initiated criminal case of calls for riots tried to interrogate them in the department.
Protocols were drawn up to activists delivered to other police department under part 6.1 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (violations of the procedure for conducting public events that entailed the creation of interference with the functioning of life support objects). On some activists, it was supposedly drawn up a protocol under Article 19.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (disobedience to the legal order of a police officer). In the Chinese Gorod police department, all detainees were also questioned by investigators of the TFR.