France recognizes the president tonight

The results of the president of France. Updated
History with Macron. The election of the President of France ended. The winner was the 39-year-old “centrist” Emmanuel Macron. He has more than 65%. Read more

Today, three days after the most dirty presidential television experts in the history of France, the outcome of the most unpredictable elections should be decided. In the morning, on the day of voting, there is only one reason for the most unpredictable elections to become revolutionary. The chance of the victory of Le Pen is an extremely high turnout of her supporters and an extremely low turnout among those who can hardly represent this figure in the chair of the president of France.

The last hundred -poll conducted after television and published on Friday evening gave 63% Macron and 37% of Le Pen.

The survey, which was conducted a week before, showed 59% by 41% in favor of Macron.

Given how Marin Le Pen conducted a debate, the loss of four percent people from her headquarters should be considered a sign of the impenetrability of the Lepenic target audience.

Simplicity is worse than theft

In the evening, on Wednes, on the air of the two main television channels of the country, Marin Le Pen proved once again that in the second round of the presidential election in France, under a certain combination of circumstances, everyone can go out.

This was the first to prove her Pope Jean-Mari Le Pen fifteen years ago. But dad slipped almost by accident, and Marin seemed to have paved the way to the top diligently and competently.

She was supposed to approach the peak of intellectual forces.

And, apparently, she approached the peak.

To demonstrate its capabilities in managing the fifth economy of the world , the candidate Le Pen used the following intellectual struggle tools :

• unsteady knowledge of the mechanisms of the work of the state and business;

• unsteady knowledge of your own program;

• unsteady knowledge of recent history;

And the following rhetorical techniques :

• grin; the spread of unverified rumors and taken from the ceiling of data; Frequent repetition of accusations from the lexicon of supporters of conspiracy theories:

• Macron is a cosmopolitan that does not remember kinship, which will lead France to the Civil War;

• Macron is a banker who wants to sell France in parts and pieces;

• Macron is a candidate "indulging in Islamic fundamentalism."

At the same time, Marin Le Pen showed unprecedented endurance, and in two hours she did not give out the secrets of her own election program.

Technocrat himself Macron on his fingers explained to his rival why the “Minister of Economics” could not “sell” a private telephone company; how the telephone company differs from the machine -building; Why is the Lepenov’s proposal to use the francs “for ordinary people”, and the euro “for calculations between states” ...

But he did not always manage to remain calm. And in response to the statement: "Madame Le Pen, you say to hell that!" He received a subtle hint of personal nature from the opponent: “I see that you are trying to play with me as a student and teacher, but this is not my trick at all.” ( Macron's wife is his school teacher ).

But Marin Le Pen took the main rabbit from the hat by the end of the transmission. Moreover, the focus was made at such a level that the ears began to stick out ahead of time.

“Watch what you say. I hope that in a few days we will not know anything ... I hope we will not know that you have an offshore account on the Bagams, ”Le Pen said.

It soon turned out that a couple of hours before the debate, a message about the existence of documents indicating “to the secret departure of the macron from taxes” through the “account of the Kaiman Strorov” appeared at the famous hacker forum (Figaro indicates that the message was left by the IP address registered in Lithuania).

Following, according to the Macron team, the materials began to spread through the American “pro-Trampovsky” resources and, by the time the debate was completed, were transferred to hundreds of accounts that “very actively distributing” the materials of Russian State Meni working in French.

The next day, Macron filed a complaint ( FR.) To the State Commission for Control of the Presidential Campan (CNCCEP), after which the Paris prosecutor’s office opened a preliminary investigation in the case of “spreading false information in order to influence the elections ...”.

Well, on Friday evening, the macron movement "En Marche!" Published by a communique ( FR. ), which states that in the general array of "compromising evidence" (9 gigabytes), genuine and fabricated male, accounting documents and contracts are mixed. The genuine papers “were stolen as a result of hacking the working and personal mail” of the employees of the Macron team “A few weeks ago”.

If this is true, then everything turned out like the written. In the newspaper Izvestia. In early February.

Compromat-ataki chronology

Let me remind you, on February 3, the franco-speaking Russian state-owned Sputnik (Federal State Unitary Enterprise MIA Russia Today) and Russia Today reported with reference to Izvestia that Julian Assange found something that was revealing against Macron in Mailee Hillary Clinton. True, what exactly found was not reported.

On February 14, a column of Richard Ferrand, General Secretary of the movement “En Marche!” Appeared in the Mond newspaper. In the text, which came out under the heading "We will not allow Russia to destabilize the presidential election in France!" It was claimed that the site "En Marche!" Monthly becomes the object of “several thousand attacks of different properties”, and their quantity and character allow us to say that they are “carried out by a coordinated group”.

On March 1, the issue of foreign intervention in the French elections was considered in the Champs Elysees at a meeting of the Security and Defense Council. Later, the issue was discussed at the Council of People's Commissars at least two more times.

Finally, on April 17, a little less than a week before the first round, Emmanuel Macron said on the air of BFMTV that he was preparing a compromise: “This week you will hear that“ Mr. Macron has a hidden account in one of the offshores. This is an absolute lie ... "

Macron was mistaken: “incriminating evidence” appeared before the second round.

"Compromat" of a slow action

Firstly, it is not clear why the "compromising" was not leaked before.

Councils showed that before the first morning, four candidates (three of them - Prochrevsky) claimed victory.

General information about the “offshore on the Kaiman Islands” could knock out the “uncomfortable” candidate Macron from the race immediately. And then the second tour would have turned into a pleasant formality for customers.

Secondly, it is not clear why neither Marin Le Pen, nor the Russian media are publishing “final paper”, which could turn the election, but are limited to hints and links to hacker resources, resembling a garbage dump, where the necessary piece of paper may lie in a huge pile of ungrolled garbage. Quote from the site Vesti.ru:

“ ... there were documents proving that Macron was hiding income on offshore accounts on the Kaiman Islands, papers about financial violations when financing the election campaign /... /, and besides, this is the letter:“ Do not forget to buy the chef “to”. Rumors that the macron is dependent on the drug, whose name just begins with “K”, and there are quite a long time, and now they go for a long time. They seem to be confirmed. "

“Rumors, it seems, are confirmed” - a brilliant formulation, but where is the document?

For some unknown circumstances, Macron opponents refuse to blow up a real “bomb”, which can lead Le Pen to victory.

It remains to assume two things: either there is no real “bomb”, but there are a dummy or customers confident in “LO Pen”, they decided to blow up the bomb after the second round - in order to destabilize the June parliamentary elections and “poison” the presidential term of Macron. With the prospect of impeachment.

The last assumption will lead us to the conclusion that customers are Demiurges. At first they allowed the only “uncomfortable” candidate to win the first round, then they scared him in front of the second round, and then they would strike at the new owner of the Champs Elysees?

This is called "No, we did not look for easy ways"?

Or is it all about the mysterious soul of an independent "Lithuanian hacker"?

PS

Or maybe the Macron team turned all this long operation to raise the candidate's rating?

Then it turns out that by the beginning of the next stage the signal was given by Marin Le Pen itself?

Follow the results of voting on our website today, on Sunday, May 7, starting from 18.00.