
“With sadness I observe all these discussions about Ukraine’s blocking of Russian resources. With sadness because many do not see the context at all that is accompanied by all this,” the politician writes on his Facebook page.
"And the context is simple: for more than three years after the Maidan, and Ukraine has not gloomed its oil and gas monopoly" Naftogaz "(mini-Gazprom"), strangles independent manufacturers. Nationalizes banks. Instead of making real reforms that we all hoped for, are busy transplanting officials in the councils of directors. There used to be many parties and they cursed, but now more and more and more are more and more and more and more and more and more and more One party controls, the Presidential Party.
If all this had not been, well, maybe the Internet blocking could be perceived as the actions of a small free country against a terrible large aggressor.
But since all this, alas, is, this situation is less and less like the struggle of a small free country against a terrible big aggressor, and more and more resembles the struggle of Northern Sudan and South Sudan. With the application of all the same methods that really use Northern and Southern Sudan. Somehow I would like to see in Ukraine a reflection of some completely different future, but it turns out like this - you will turn the card upside down, and bam - South Sudan from above, and northern - below. And then you will turn over again - and vice versa.
I know him, maybe there South Sudan is terribly good and fights against the terribly bad North Sudan. I did not understand this. But from the outside they look the same.
Unfortunately, this situation is more and more like this. "