Kirill Shulika: "Small Civil War"

"But let's say directly. Renovation is a classic form of nationalization and revision of privatization outcomes, expressed in departure from the population of the population. Understand whether property is not bad or good, it either is or not. I have it, and if it does not arrange me, I will sell it, change, give it some possible according to the law of action. According to the constitution, my right of private property The state is protected and cannot decide for me that I want to get rid of it, ”writes a politician in a blog on the website of the Echo of Moscow radio station.

"And the most obscene in renovation is that the state was eliminated from the process of getting rid of my property. This mission was assigned to my neighbors. That is, they decide whether I want to move somewhere or not. Actually, now I am interested in why not ask the people, does it want Usmanov, Abramovich or someone else from the oligarchs to sell their assets? The deputies gave their apartments and lived in Khrushchev.

I understand the neighbors who want to move, and for many this is probably the only chance in life. After all, the state has done everything possible so that a simple person in Russia could never solve his housing issue - an absolutely bloated real estate market with overstated prices, including all sorts of kickbacks and other “corruption taxes”, completely fantastic interest on mortgages and a lot more. But I myself do not want to move, because everything suits me, but as I stop, I will find a way to solve my housing problem.

Yes, in the end, who knew that the officials would hit the head, so I made a repair, which, to put it mildly, hit my pocket very much. In the new apartment, no one will make me a warm floor, so relevant this summer, and will not put imported plumbing. It turns out that those who equip their housing regularly pay utility bills and do other things that are useful to the state, find themselves in a worst position than those who have never made repairs since the construction of the house.

Here you have a line of a very dangerous confrontation in every house. It can be called a small civil war. Any redistribution of property ends with exactly this. The state provokes this war, which is eliminated from the protection of property rights on the one hand and the adoption of unpopular decisions on the other. It encountered people with different interests among themselves. This already leads to the beaten neighbors, and to frank chiseling, in principle, a stone's throw. After all, some seem to get the only chance in life to enter a new apartment, while others have arranged their home and simply do not have financial capabilities to equip new in accordance with their life standards. ”

"So Muscovites are waiting for a difficult time. How did the property redistributed the property in the 90s, remember? It was an inevitable process of transition to the market, but nevertheless I no longer want brothers, raiders and shootings anymore. But these were factories, mines and oil fields, objectively speaking, not relating to the majority of the population. And now such a redistribution threatens every apartment in houses delivered to the demolition. It doesn’t matter if you are for renovation or against, since your ownership right is guaranteed to prevent some part of the neighbors to realize your dream. ”