Jury proven

You can’t cancel the governor’s elections, the basic law prohibits, but if you really want to, then you can. You can’t go for a third term, the Virgin does not tell ... that is, again, the Constitution, but this is not an obstacle. “A citizen of the Russian Federation cannot be deprived of his citizenship or the right to change it,” this is a direct quote from the same book, above the already mentioned, and nevertheless. Extremists, terrorists, as well as inciters of growth and other separatism, why not take away the passports if the president decided that they were not worthy? In the meantime, the law that cancel the constitutional norm has not been adopted, other ways of leaving citizenship are also suitable. Suppose a dad of a suicide bomber presented a knowingly false information about himself - and this is enough for both the father and son to not be considered Russians. Why? Well,the court decided .

The question is fundamental.

In a free country, a free person independently determines whether he wishes or does not want to be a citizen of his state. In the country is not free, like the one from where we are all, with the exception of the young tribe, this determined the bosses. The deprivation of citizenship was punished there, although this sounded like a paradox: you, they say, comrade, is allowed to leave the concentration camp without the right to return. Or you have already left, Mr. Writer, but abroad behaved badly, therefore, for actions that defeat the high rank, lose your citizenship. A small man was the private property of a large socialist state, and he decided what to do with him. To hold within the boundaries of a large zone, occasionally release, plant, throw out as unnecessary or for the reason that this citizen spreads harmful ideas, and shoot him politically inappropriate.

In Russia, the current one is still impossible to treat compatriots, but the first steps in this direction are already being taken. As usual, Vladimir Vladimirovich himself martialates with the constitution. And to whom, if not a guarantor, to do this most important thing?

In the fall of 2004, he explained the need to abolish the elections of regional leaders with a tragedy in Beslan. Seven years later, it turned out that they agreed in advance with Medvedev to temporarily change places, and then there was nothing to object to conscience, although many tried. Now Putin became interested in citizens. In April, the president proposed to think about a bill that allows you to take away the passports from the villains, and a few days later the leaders of all four parliamentary factions (as on command, yes) introduced the indicated bill. And yesterday, meeting with Speaker Volodin, he developed this topic.

“With us,” the president of the speaker informed, “when people join the army, they make an oath. But when a person enters the citizenship of our country, you also could think and take the experience of some foreign states, when there is an oath, a gear, another solemn act, which a person confirms his intention to become a citizen of our country, observe its laws, traditions, respect these traditions, history and so on.” The speaker understood the interlocutor at a half -room. He spoke about the “responsibility” and “obligations” of the oath and about the “amendments”, which can be introduced into the bill that has already passed the first reading.

The thought about the oath should be evaluated by fairness and recognized as wonderful. About such prosecutorial monologues in the upcoming ships, where there will be different troubles in the massive order, will deprive citizenship. Did you swear to follow the laws? Respect tradition? Be proud of history? Geography? Natural science? Did you swear or did not swear? Did you go to Bobruisk? Well, and so on, as the president correctly noted. In general, if this Putin’s idea is competently realized, then such prospects and constitutional abysses will reveal that it is directly breathtaking. Then in Russia there will be no one left except those who solemnly swore allegiance and restrained their word. In addition to sterile patriots.

It is not clear, however, who actually remains, not counting Putin. About Volodin, some doubts already arise. Therefore, I would advise, when pronouncing sentences to oath -criminals, to observe a certain caution so that Russian villages and cities do not depopulate. Separating, so to speak, sheep from goats and temporarily stumbled, but socially close citizens from the inveterate enemies.

In order to not turn out the overlays, such as with oligarchs and ordinary millionaires, whom the authorities wanted to turn to patriots without exception, adopting a law on deofshorization in 2014, and they ran from Russia. Either out of greed, or from fear that the last will be taken here. As a result, the country was underlined many billions in different solid currencies, despite the fact that in crisis times this money is not at all superfluous. Brain leaks based on the results of the “Oath” special operation can also have a painful effect on the economy of the Russian Federation. Russophobes, national traitors and other liberals that obviously will not pass the test for patriotism - they are mostly smart, reptiles. Without them, there will be, of course, much calmer, but also boring to live without them. So, perhaps, you don’t have to deprive citizenship and expel them all in a row, and leave some and even feed them from time to time, like artists. It will not be worse, it seems to me.

However, there is hardly any doubt about the wisdom of the ruler and climb him with uninvited advice. Clarifying the basic law, he is still rarely mistaken. As for the issues of citizenship, at the end of the ends to Vladimir Vladimirovich with his punitive authorities, moreover, who we have is an extremist, who is Russian. It even happens that a person is declared a terrorist and sentenced to, like Oleg Sentsov, but at the same time persistently and carelessly transferred to Russian citizenship, as if to which Gerard Depardieu. The mind does not understand all this, but the laws do not trample and correspond to that to be comprehended. The laws are violated and corresponded in order to obey them, in which the deep plan consists. We will not retreat from him a single slice and swear that we will be true.