Moldavian map of the Kremlin

This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.

Having lost to Ukraine and Montenegro the Kremlin strategists rely on the winnings in Moldova, where the domestic political situation is aggravated. Two branches of power, the pro -Russian presidential and pro -Western government are struggling among themselves. In the conditions of the existence of Transnistria controlled by the Kremlin, the situation can lead to unpredictable consequences.

The government sent several Russian diplomats for actions incompatible with status, interference in internally and subversive activities. In response to the expulsion, President Dodon is outraged, i.e. He stands to the side of Russia to the detriment of his country, which he heads. Moldova seems to be the only country in the world where the president purposefully undermines the national security of his state. The head of state is a lawyer of another state. He is the only presidents who were next to Putin during the celebration of May 9. There was no one else. There were not even “official” Kholuyev. Neither Lukashenko, nor Nazarbayev, nor Sargsyan, nor Kim Jong -un, nor Assad.

Just what, Dodon every time goes to Putin, or for support, or to get new instructions.

For the Kremlin, Moldova is an important strategic bridgehead, especially to continue the war against Ukraine. When in 2014 a decision was made on the use of Russian troops abroad and a direct invasion of Ukraine was prepared, experts considered the option of impact from all sides, including And from the Transnistria.

That is why Putin seeks to take Moldova to his hands. He spent his protege, almost simultaneously with Trump. Hoping to establish in the republic a political system similar to the Russian or Belarusian. The fight against elites is being carried out, many people were planted on charges of corruption, the entire Chisinau City Hall is under arrest. Surely these processes are supervised from the Kremlin, just like the seizure of objects in the Crimea was controlled from there.

But in order to establish the regime of authoritarian power, the main thing is to do is destroy the freedom of the media. From this, Putin began, capturing NTV and all national television channels. Starting with NTV, he graduated from Donbass.

The main reason why Moldova was on the verge of disaster in that she could not finally escape from the Soviet heritage, from the scoop, in this country, there was no democratic revolution and decommunization in the full sense of the word. The departure from the past was incomplete, half. If the democratization process went through all the stages completely, then no Dodons would have appeared close. Dodon is a reaction to insufficiency and inconsistency of transformations. In the same way, the arrival of Yanukovych in Ukraine in 2010 is a consequence of the incompleteness of the orange revolution. There was a rollback in the opposite direction, back to the Kremlin empire. Instead of moving forward. Therefore, it is no coincidence that the new president seeks to withdraw Moldova from the association with the EU and include in structures controlled by the Kremlin. Russian propaganda and agents under the roof of diplomats are practically unhindered. If this happens to Montenegro and Macedonia and even in the USA, then what is it about.

Now the Putin Chekist regime is pushing the Moldavian society to destabilization and the civil war. If it is not stopped, there is a great risk of resuming the Transnistrian war. In the first 1992 campaign, some Ukrainian nationalists were on the side of Transnistria, thereby harming themselves. Now Ukraine, realizing the threat, takes measures to neutralize it, announcing the readiness to establish a blockade of Transnistria.

But I'm sure Putin will lose Moldova. He lost to Ukraine. Recently lost Montenegro, where he tried to arrange a coup d'etat. Thus, he only pushed her to join NATO.

The president of any state in his policy is obliged to be guided by national interests. Otherwise, his finale is sad. Yanukovych came to power to the left and right of the sovereignty and national interests of Ukraine, went to sign destructive Kharkov agreements, lost to the Kremlin in the language issue, and eventually found himself with a broken trough. The same thing awaits the President of Moldova Igor Dodon, if he does not abandon the capitulant policy. So what, that he owes Putin a chair. The Kremlin helped him come to power, but in order to stay in power, it is necessary to pursue a more independent and state policy, to turn away from authoritarian Russia.

The president must be a statesman. If he is not such, he is doomed. Moldavian society faced serious trials.