Sergey Davidis: "Deformation"

“The epic with yesterday’s shares once again demonstrated the deformation and degradation of legal concepts,” writes a politician and member of the Bureau of the Federal Political Council of the Solidarity movement on Facebook .

“Their degradation of the authorities of the type of Chernikov’s type is natural. They have never had the concept of law on their own way. They always believed that there is no right, but there is a restraint the letter of the law. They don’t know how to rule the city and the country, and they understand the disposal of their state’s rights and freedoms in order to ensure these rights and freedoms of these rights and freedoms.

Only with this understanding can we object to the fact that people are going to go to the official festive walk with Russian flags and chanting slogans. Of course, nothing unlawful, but also illegal in such an exit.

Such degradation in police officers pouncing with batons and fists on all, including women and children, who is in a public place open to the visit (Julia Galyamina, for example, received a concussion as a result of a blow to the person inflicted by the police). The police have work - not the laws to protect and not the right, but to comply with the orders of the authorities. They pay money for this.

It is also understandable among the judges. For that, they appointed Putin by judges to protect his power. It would not occur to them to find out what damage and what public interests the detainee caused if his guilt can be established only on the basis of police officers that he was not there or screaming, although only no one could be punished at all.

The deformation of the chairman of the Human Rights of Fedotov, who said that the police acted correctly, the detainees themselves were to blame, and Navalny was arrested for 30 days absolutely correctly correctly. He, an experienced lawyer, should appreciate the balance between the realization of citizens' rights to freedom of assembly and expression and hypothetical damage to public interests as a result of the realization of these rights. In the situation on June 12 (like March 26), this balance is obvious: there was no damage to protected public interests, comparable to the importance of the realization of the constitutional rights of citizens.

I would like to hope that M. Fedotov will become ashamed when such an authoritative organ as the ECHR will indicate the absurd unlawfulness of his assessments, but by the time he indicates, probably, either the ishak or the pads will die, and even if I don’t, I suspect, we amazingly find out that Fedotov had not at all.

But citizens themselves, who consider themselves supporters of democracy and human rights, at least somehow justify power and condemn civilians who have reached the official, organized, including for them, a holiday with the aim of expressing their, not state opinion, to maintain crazy talk about the "provocations" from the protesters, it seems to me, ashamed and ridiculous. "