Telegram has not yet been handed over

What specifically agreed by Pavel Durov

Durov made a new statement in a protracted chill with Zharv about the status of free Internet in Russia. The creator of Telegram said that he would not object to the use of the company's data in the register of “organizers of the distribution of information” (Ori). But at the same time, it still categorically objects to tracking users or fulfilling the requirements of the package of Yarovoy.

The market reacted to this message instantly. There was news that Durov prepared for surrender. These moods seem hasty. The day before, Durov denied the information that the company prepares the technology of bypassing the locks in Two Clicks - according to him, it is not necessary to take the messenger written in the unofficial channels for the corporate position. It is clear that in reality the Telegram blocking in Russia will entail a loss of mass user, who will prefer to choose simpler solutions available in the market - like the WhatsApp authorities who are still outside the zone.

The last statement, it seems, was formulated by the creator of Telegram intentionally ambiguously. Durov does not say that he intends to enter the company's data to the register of Roskomnadzor. He only claims that these data are already well -known, and that he does not object to their entry in the register. Those who must enter data, conditionally, durov or fryers, remains open.

The position of Telegram, thus, lies in the fact that there is no problem in the “providing five identifiers for the registry”, on which Roskomnadzor insists. And to say that Telegram violates in this regard Russian legislation either. It can be allowed that Telegram representatives also sent information duplicating Durov’s statement to Roskomnadzor through official channels. The registration data of the companies required for the Ori Register will not help the Russian authorities in the case of the messenger perelustration.

Now the ball is on the side of Roskomnadzor. The department should tell whether they are satisfied, or the messenger is waiting for the next portion of claims.

We would put on the second option - perhaps its implementation will begin after a small pause.