A case of calls for terrorism was discovered against Politzek Romanov

Against the anarchist Ilya Romanov, who was serving a nine -year term in the terrorism case, a new business has been instituted - calls for terrorist activities. This was written on her FB page by an employee of the civil rights committee, the ex-wife of Politsek Larisa Romanova.

The case is open under article 205.2 of the Criminal Code (public calls for terrorism). The investigation is conducted by the Mordovian FSB. Romanov was transferred from IK-22 strict regime, located in the village of Lepley, the Zubovo-Polyansky district, in the pre-trial detention center-1 in Saransk.

What exactly was the reason for initiating the case is not specified in the publication.

In May, the IK-22 administration placed Romanov for four months in PKT . Under what pretext the penalty was imposed is unknown.

Nizhny Novgorod Romanov was arrested in the fall of 2013 after an unsuccessful experiment with pyrotechnics, as a result of which he lost his left hand. Along with the attempt on the Romanov terrorist attack, preparation was charged with justification of terrorism. Politzek himself pleaded guilty only in the illegal storage of explosives and the illegal turnover of ammunition.

In early August 2016, the mother and stepfather of Larisa Romanova were detained at the post office in Moscow when they sent the Police to the colony a money transfer - 1,500 rubles. The police themselves called the police themselves, finding out that Romanov was included in Rosfinmonitoring in the list of terrorists and extremists. In the OP of the Chertanovo Central, the detainees forced to inform the names, names and patronymics of all their relatives, threatening that in case of refusal they would be engaged in the CPE.

Later in the same month, the Nizhny Novgorod Regional Court, on the complaint of Romanov, recognized the decision to be illegal to put the Politzek on preventive accounting as an extremist, adopted in 2015 by the administration of the SIZO-1 in the regional center. In November 2016, it became known that the leadership of the IK-22 withdrew the prisoner from the profile . However, whether this was done in pursuance of a court decision, is not exactly known.