Your letters. July 21, 2017

“You recently spoke out against compulsory school education. They did not leave me indifferent, Anatoly Ivanovich. Do you know why I was kicked out of the Soviet school? 3a stupidity. Now guess what kind of IQ do I have? You will not guess in the living. The highest is one hundred and eighty. So, my stupidity was that, out of infancy, I could not understand how to behave in the classroom, in the team, why consist in it, why does it exist at all and what I have to do with it. I had to make a mistake in several. Teachers in their political pugils are the record holder of the scoop. The male floor was rare, it was no better. I 3 akanchi on the evening. It was believed that it was prestigious, difficult. And I experienced relief! The guys there were serious, the scum quickly washing out, because they were not held. When I look at a certain figure who says that “they are not there”, I remember the school. It was there that we were accustomed to constantly lying and getting used to universal lies. There are no them there, ours in the Donbass - and all. Wives will renounce their husbands, parents from sons, no one will be surprised, will not be upset. ”

“In Moscow,” writes Ivan Zorin, “they talk little about politics. Only on the internet. All on the drum. Only about money, which is less. ” In this regard, I, Ivan, sometimes began to behave not quite correctly, not entirely cultural. As I hear the complaint that there is less money - but I have to hear constantly - I answer, I answer the same way. Nothing, I say, you will have less money - you will spend less on replenishment of mobile phones, as well as on all sorts of fruit drinks, phantles and chips. You will cook not twelve dishes on the memorial table, as it is now, but at least six ... Well, what are those few who are still interested in this or that side or another? One of the participants in the conversation on my Facebook page sent a piece from Chekhov’s story “Steppe”. I read in one Russian newspaper our days. “Our mother Rasia to the whole world of Ga-la-va! " - suddenly sang Kiryukha with a wild voice, choked and fell silent. The steppe echo picked up his voice, suffered, and, it seemed, stupidity itself rolled along the steppe on heavy wheels. ” 1888. If I am not mistaken, the words from the soldier's song that were sung during the Crimean War are given. Since then, one hundred and sixty years have passed. And in the same conversation (in today's conversation, on my Facebook page - not in the Chekhov “steppe”), a far from the old monk -priest of the Russian Orthodox Church gives his vision of our modernity. He believes that on the territory of Ukraine there is currently a "corrugated and malicious political bank of Russia and America." Such a modern clarification of Kiryukhina’s picture of the world: not one “g-la-va” to the whole world, but two. It is made more understandable and the past and the present (as if it were not clear so far). You involuntarily think that the next father can say, from that era that will be another hundred years later. Probably, not two, but three “g-la-you” will see. All the same, one of them, according to him, will be “Rasia”.

Not all patriots can clearly justify why, in their opinion, Russia should not be inferior to the West, or rather, America, why it should compete and bicker with them. But those that can justify this say the following. If you get out of Syria and Ukraine, in Russia the nineties will be repeated - the post -Soviet disorder, the new and the last, the collapse of the country. But the Americans, they say, also cannot retreat, because then there will begin a fight at the top between those who will do it (that is, retreat), and who will be against it. Moreover, the leadership of Russia still considers to add democracy. It is believed that such a course has really been outlined, but he, they say, do not like many in America, because he will strengthen Russia. Finally, according to these amateur strategists, the Americans do not believe that Russia is ready to exchange nuclear blows with them, so it is important to convince them that it is ready. How? Show, for example, that we, Russians, are already storing with products, check the bomb shelter. It is better to death than to reckon with Western rules. To be considered is to send yourself into submission, into slavery. Anton Kraslav writes: “To confront or die. There is no choice: the rate is too high. If we allow the Western victory according to the type of 91st - Russia is an end forever. They will tear to pieces, and the neighbors will also connect. ” In other words: either such as Mr. Korenev, it will be allowed to restore the empire, or even what remains of it, but for them it is better than death than such a turn.

In general, it smells of something not very good. Opponents of all sorts of mess are depressed almost until despication. This is especially evident when you translate their careful science -like scriptures into Russian. I must say that it is not so easy to wipe through the fact that Mr. Night, for example, called a pure wordobludium: development vector, growth points, replication of models, flagship projects, technological clusters, design management, structural attitudes, economic paradigms, etc., etc. But when you pull through this, you feel a move on your head, although there is almost nothing left there. Before us is something like new Stalinists. They are seriously worried about the audacity of street political festivities of youth. This, as they are expressed, are superfluous people - superfluous and therefore very dangerous for the authorities. Stalinists believe that the Kremlin should not think about anything so tightly now, how to take these extra ones, how to distract them from rebellious thoughts. Maybe something to captivate. These are youth, accustomed to work anywhere, but not in factories and construction sites. While there was a lot of oil money, she was in business, and now she sits on beans, nervous and ready to rush to the assault on the Kremlin. What specifically, according to the Stalinists, is necessary to do without delay, and the authorities, they say, is without a prominent slope on its head? First of all, that excess people will do otherwise in their ways. You, listeners of “Freedom”, will laugh, but we are talking about the redistribution of largest and largest property. To dispossess the rich who can do nothing but steal. To dispossess everyone, and to plant many. It is impossible, they say, it is careless to think that everything will resolve, that with the growth of the economy, the gap between the rich and the poor will slowly decrease. So, to strike at once on the two main enemies of the Russian state: on the rich and Buzoter, not allowing themselves to be the idea of that one of their leaders allow the voters to struggle for votes. At the same time, the state should curb the economic element. Yes, something like that under Stalin.

“Watch Anatoly Ivanovich,” writes Mr. Terekhov from the Moscow Region, “carefully follow this course of political and economic thought in Russia. It may turn out that the new Stalinism really ripens - no longer Soviet, but Russian Stalinism of the first -century twin. It is no accident that a letter with compliments to North Korea, which you announced in one of the recent programs, appeared in your mail. I listened to it in your performance twice, and re -read it three times. There is something to think about and what to be afraid of. Dictature projects are multiplying. We have well -known pillars of Stalinist thought, but there are also supports of these pillars. There is no shortage of the supporters of a strong hand, which should replace the weak handle of a seemingly current president. Read from one of these undergrounds: “Stalin's name is today in popularity in the upper lines of polls. The country is ready for cool changes. And it is not necessary to break everything through the knee. It is fairly by political leadership to clearly explain this path of development of the state, and the rest will occur by self-wearing carefully, legally and efficiently. Of course, in the presence of solid will and hands. As for the radicals, it must be understood that they are the main engines of history. It is only necessary to separate the radicals from the creative direction from radical-destroying radicals. Some - to power, the rest - to the taiga, to build cities, factories, the northern trade route, ”writes this Stalinist. And he begins: “Remember what wave of patriotism and moral rise of the people caused the return of Crimea? It was here, in the appendage, it was not enough for the political victory in the same Donbass. And there would be a military victory, the political situation outside and inside the country would have developed so that the radical change of political elites would be inevitable. Moreover, the people were waiting for this. Demanded! But we ourselves know who did not have enough political will and courage then. We need a military victory. The army today is ready for this than ever. ” This, Anatoly Ivanovich, proclaims a retired officer -pagan, a graduate of the Moscow Higher Combined Arms Command Orders of Lenin and the October Revolution of the Red Banner School of the Russian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic, ”writes Terekhov.

Stalinist dreams, as it should be, include positions, in which the whole country will not have opponents in Russia: immediately, in the coming months, to resign the government, to announce the sentences to the largest corrupt officials, to mercilessly led the personnel of the highest authorities and proclaim a new economic course - the same, which provides for the majestic construction of the eyelids. With dissatisfied. Mr. Ustinov sees this like this: “Workplaces - to the boys, aggressive unsystematic oppositionists - in the reservation, smart and non -aggressive - to the opposition national front.” And, of course, "the Ministry of feedback with the" people "must be created, which will be obliged to actively collect all complaints, first of all, and proposals." The author took the word "people" in quotation marks. For such people, of course, by society, someone must manage by society, that this someone is a state, senior officials, but they must manage deliberately, in accordance with the country's development program, and manage to manage hard. Neither those who they refer to us are referred to, nor those who I find on the Web have a word about democracy, human rights, and civil initiative. Red thread - thought: stop playing in the game alien to the Russian spirit, including, by the way, in the free market. To end the elements of all kinds. With a spontaneous enrichment of those in power, with a spontaneous movement of capital. Subordinate everything to the highest will, the national plan and ... here you will laugh again: at the same time they demand to make Russian life more interesting, to captivate masses with great undertakings. Yeah, make Russian life more interesting. I read (Andrei Dashkin writes): “In general, it is necessary to add interestingness and excitement in all areas of the functioning of society. In the nineties there was an excitement of money money. Yes, finely, but the excitement was. Syria and Crimea are great, these are challenges at the very tip of the policy of modern civilization. The same calls on the tip should be abandoned in economics, science and public life. ”

“God is a witness,” writes Mr. Gromyko, “as well as my loved ones and friends, that I knew Bulgaria and Romania twenty -five years ago that I would be the poorest in Europe. I judged by my impressions of staying in these countries, and also used my own common sense and some knowledge of how the state is rich in and why it does not need gold when a simple product has - this is the author recalls the young dumbbell of Evgeny Onegin, who had gathered this wisdom from the scientist of the English gentleman Adam Smith. “Then,” Gromyko continues, “twenty -five years ago, it could not have thought of explaining such the future of these countries by the evil selfish actions of Germany.” But here I hear and even read how serious people bring to us that Germany is the second, after the United States of America, the imperialist predator country, which flourishes because it pumps out juices from the rest of Europe, getting into France and Italy, since there is nothing more to take from Romania, Bulgaria and others. To lectors and teachers who say this, our youth applauds. I am a witness. No one questions the concept. They ask questions only on the technique of robbing the states and Germany of the helpless world - how to do it. Marxism -Leninism is again on the march, but so far it is not called in any way, ”writes Mr. Gromyko. Indeed, questions in such cases are asked only on the technique of robbery, and are asked not only by your students (you, as I understand it, a teacher, a white crow in his educational institution, longing for a white crow). When people hear about a prosperous country that not everything is clean, they have no doubt that it is: not everything is clean. What evidence is needed if they, these countries, are so successful, so rich, so developed? The hedgehog is clear that at the expense of others, at the expense of us left by God.

And I must say that the technique of “robbery” is set forth by the patriotic teaching staff in detail and with everything relish. What is the West accused of? The fact that he accepted and accepts the money of large and largest Russian thieves to his accounts. And here's the new, very interesting and promises not a very boring future. Russian patriots-innovidians of the West accuse, as we heard, and their own domestic thieves. What? The fact that they sent this money to the West, which was ensured, they say, it, the West, well -being. I will say even more. These patriots, these Krymnashists are no longer afraid to personally blame Putin and his close associates aloud. What? The fact that, having entered the taste of theft, in 2007 they offered the Western rulers no longer purely thieves, but a real gangster deal: we, Russians, will still send you the money of the Russian people stolen by us, and you will allow us to host the space of the former Soviet Union. How amazed the Kremlin (amazed-not my word, this is the word of its exposure to patriots), when he heard in response that he could not bless such an atrocities, the West. After that, as they explain to Russian students, the imperialists switched to the landing of juices from the Arab world, arranging a number of messs there. But there - an hour from an hour is not easier - they had difficulties, because Russia got there with its military operations. So she finally made her reckon with herself. This is the patriots approve: to keep it, it is necessary and henceforth to benefit from the feuds of two imperial predators - states and Germany. On this path, Russia, they say, is waiting for a glorious future. One writes this (not to “freedom” writes, they sent me his statement): “And in general, let our children play our military, in our heroes in Syria! And not in drug addicts, bankers or prostitutes. This is much more interesting and useful for the future and their countries. The most important social moment. This, in fact, is the image of the future, about which everyone talks so much. ” I brought the words not at all an unknown Moscow professor. He is printed, invited to television, not a doctor. He and his one -thoughts (kalgi - he loves this word) is a phenomenon that simply shocked me at the beginning: the Kremlin and personally Putin are charged on shooting articles for one and immediately proclaim praise for another: for shooting in Ukraine and Syria for the glory and benefits of Russia.

What does this mean, friends? New Stalinism can become a burial to Putinism, who owes his mature. Dialectics, you understand. Moreover, the graveler and in the literal sense of the word. He will be forced to send Putinism with his asset to Solovki and Kolyma not from bloodthirstiness, but walking towards the wishes of the workers. Several years ago, one listener of “Freedom”, I remember, wrote to me to transfer Russian democrats and liberals so that they would not think about himself too much, because when it comes to the present thing, he wrote, the new power will not be so small-the game will fall larger and more numerous than some democrats and democrats, liberals and liberals. This, it seems, is already looming. “Crimea saved us,” one of the ideologists of this power directly declares and explains quite frankly what he means. The annexation of Crimea, an attack on Ukraine, Russia set itself under the blow of Western sanctions. This forces the ruling layer to return to Russia, from which he retired, in a figurative one, and someone in the literal sense of the word - to return and engage in the internal structure of it, a new industrialization by his robbed and neglected country. And in order for the population to be willingly fenced off from the West and engaged in self-sufficiency, it must be mobilized and inspired, and then you want, you want, but you will have to satisfy its cherished desire to see on the pillars of the body of folk offenders. But they will not punish themselves.

I read from letters to a person, pleased with the life of a person, Patriot: “In Russia, freedom of speech, democracy, entrances in Russian houses are clean, they don’t vote for bandits, collective farms with the district committees either. For each pharmacy I will not entrust you with, but alcohol -containing liquids also need to be looked for. ” You ask why he writes it. I know why. He fulfills his patriotic duty, as he understands. Such people are advanced in the front ranks, when propaganda reaches a certain intensity, when she convinces almost everyone that is enemies around, that it is necessary to protect their homeland from them. Then volunteers of different specialties are starting to business, including in terms of the word. Here is one of these fighters of the ideological front and wrote to us. Does he know that he wrote to Brechnya? Certainly. But it is in Brekhn that he sees his duty. Так он показывает себе и власти, что он настоящий патриот, не зря коптит небо. Письма людей этого склада убедительно свидетельствуют, к чему пришла Россия. По крайней мере, для меня убедительно, не меньше, чем труды серьезных исследователей современной России. К фашизму она пришла, к русскому фашизму образца двадцать первого века.

«Когда из страны, - следующее письмо, - уезжают учёные, врачи и остальные представители умственного труда, уезжает цвет народа - интеллигенция, то потом в такой стране правителями становятся плебеи и проходимцы с улицы, а депутатами парламента - базарные спекулянты, спортсмены и артисты». Это Юрий Терко приводит выдержку из выступления Харса Енсена в парламенте Швеции в 1932 году. Вот я не знаю, какие возражения услышал тогда этот оратор. Возражения были наверняка – на то и парламент, чтобы одни говорили белое, другие – черное. Наверняка кто-то хмуро или горячо заметил, что спортсмены и артисты, они тоже люди, тоже граждане, не говоря уже о базарных спекулянтах. Легко представить и ответ Енсена: не валяйте, братцы, дурака, не делайте вид, что не поняли, о чем вам было сказано.

Госпожа Келлерман перебирала старые бумаги - решила, пишет, выкинуть - а там слова частушек… Белорусская: «Не смотри ты на меня, что я худноватая. Бацька сала не дає, я не виноватая!». Русская: «У маво миленка одна рубашонка, два пояса и ремень - перемена каждый день». А вот поморская частушка тридцатых годов, «Не ходите, девки, к морю - море колыхается. Не любите, девки, Вовку - Вовка матюкается». Красноречивые частушки. В них тоже правда - правда давней жизни. Нищета и грубость, всеохватная грубость.

«Мой многолетней выдержки друг, - пишет господин Яськов, - бывший университетский преподаватель, человек невероятной доброты и сочувствия к людям (среди мужчин я таких не встречал вообще), последние три десятка лет занимается в Киеве тем, что можно назвать "социализацией беспризорников". Сколько раз его подопечные (которых он и из тюрем вытягивал, и приют давал) обворовывали, сколько раз подставляли - не сосчитать. Он продолжает упорствовать в своём безнадёжном деле. "Кто-то же должен им помогать, на кого-то же они должны надеяться". Однажды в немецком посольстве на сходке по сбору денег для украинских беспризорников пожилой немецкий бизнесмен спросил его: "Скажите, господин Сухоруков, скольких молодых людей вам за все эти годы удалось социализировать?" И Андрей Александрович честно ответил: "Ни одного". - "Спасибо за откровенность", - сказал немец. Ни одного, Анатолий Иванович. Вы поняли мой намек?». Понял, дорогой, поэтому прочитаю следующее и последнее на сегодня письмо, автора не назову. «Что можно сказать тем, кто еще не окончательно решил, за кого он: за белых или красных? Ничего, потому что никого ни в чем ни убедить, ни, тем более, переубедить невозможно. Это доказано многими тонкими социологическими исследованиями и экспериментами. За консерваторов голосуют люди более опасливые, недоверчивые и боящиеся перемен, за прогрессистов, за демократов и либералов - легковерные, беззаботные, склонные к пробам и ошибкам. И они отличаются генетически. Такими уродились. Счастье популяции - в разнообразии, в том, что есть и те, и другие. Каждый приобретает те убеждения, к которым склонен! Сужу по себе. Про меня мама еще в детстве сказала: «Урод в попе ноги». А в другой раз, под хорошее настроение, на свадьбе: «Смотрела я на гостей. Одно интеллигентное лицо - твое». Why so? Потому что я уродился другим - не таким, как вся наша родня».