The prosecutor demanded for Chiygoz 8 years of general regime

The prosecutor Anastasia Supryag in the Office in the Supreme Court of the annexed Crimea demanded eight years of general regime for the deputy chairman of the Majlis of the Crimean Tatar people Akhtem Chiygoz in the “February 26 case”. This was reported by "Crimea. Realities."

According to Supryagi, although the events considered in the case occurred even under the Ukrainian authorities, after the annexation of the peninsula, Russian laws gained retroactive force "in relation to the crimes of an earlier period to protect the rights and interests of citizens."

At the same time, eight years is the minimum period that provides for the sane by Chiygoz part 1 of Article 212 of the Russian Criminal Code (organization of riots).

During the debate between Supryuga and Chiygoz, a skirmish occurred. Politsyk noticed the prosecutor that she was talking quickly and slurred. “You can’t behave like that,” Supryaga answered. Then, at her request, the court interrupted the meeting.

About 50 Crimean Tatar activists came to support Chiygoz, including the overwhelming of Medzhlis Ilmi Umarov, who himself is under trial.

On February 26, 2014, the protests of the Maidanites, mainly of the Crimean Tatars, tore the vote planned in the Verkhovna Rada of the Crimea on the appointment of an illegal referendum. A year later, the occupation authorities began to fabricate the case of riots. The occasion was the clashes between the supporters of the Euromaidan and the participants in the rally of pro -Russian forces, at the same time passed by the parliament. According to the Russian prosecutor's office of the peninsula, during these clashes, "two people died, 79 bodily harm of varying severity were caused."

The prosecutor stated that the guilt of Chiygoz is confirmed by the testimony of the head of the occupation administration of Crimea Sergey Aksenov, the chairman of the State Committee for Interethnic Relations and the Deported Peoples of the Zaurov administration, the head of the Primmnevsky regional national-cultural autonomy of the Crimean Tatar Eyvaz Umarov, Senators from the peninsula of Olga Covitidi and the peninsulas and the peninsula. Sergey Tsekov, speaker of the Russian State Council of Crimea Vladimir Konstantinov, as well as three secret witnesses. The defense testimonies, according to the state prosecutor, do not refute the rest of the evidence.

In addition, Supryaga mentioned the video files in the case file, which allegedly shows how Chiygoz builds people in front of the Crimean Rada building.

In January 2015, Chiygoz became the first arrested in the case. In addition to the deputy chairman of the Mejlis, there were seven more defendants in the case: Eskender Kantemirov, Eskender Emirviliev, Yunusov, Ali Asanov, Eskender Nebiev, Mustafa Degermmenji and Arsen Yunusov. He was charged with part 2 of Article 212 of the Code (participation in the riots), which provides for a period of 3 to 8 years.

Nebiev and Yunusov melt the deal with the prosecutor’s office, and their materials were allocated in separate production. At different times at the end of 2015, both received conditional terms.

The main “case of February 26” began to be considered in the Supreme Court of Crimea in December 2015, but a month and a half later, in February 2016, he was returned to the prosecutor's office.

Last summer, after repeated admission to the court, the case was divided - the materials in relation to Chiygoz were allocated into separate proceedings. The hearing in the case of the deputy chairman of the Mejlis has been continuing since August 2016.

The hearing in the case of the other five defendants go from the fall in the Central District Court of Simferopol under the control of Russia; The process is conducted by judge Sergey Demenok. In early April, the last two accused, who until that moment held in the pre -trial detention center - Asanov and Degermendzhi - were transferred to house arrest.

In March 2017, Chiygoz filed a petition to restore the deadlines for sentences to Nebiev and Talyat Yunusov. The Politzek pointed out that the cases of these defendants were considered without the participation of both himself and his lawyers, and he got acquainted with the sentences only on February 27, more than a year after the adoption. At the same time, in the sentences of Nebiev and Talyata Yunusov, a number of facts that directly affect the chiigosis were indicated as the court established by the court, and since the cases were considered in a special order, these facts were not proven in the processes.

On May 21, a decision was made to appeal to the verdict to Talyata Yunusov. The collegium of the Supreme Court of the annexed Crimea (Judge -Rosom -Pali Judge Pali) excluded from the text a indication of Chiygoz as the organizer of "riots".