The third business of Kvachkov: the prosecutor demanded three years

In the debate of the parties in the third case of the retired colonel of the GRU Vladimir Kvachkov, the prosecutor demanded for the defendant three years in the colony. Such information on Tuesday was reported by Interfax-Volga.

At the same time, the official asked the judge of the Volga District Military Court in Samara Alexander Lednev to re -qualify the accusation of Kvachkov from part 1 of Article 205.2 of the Criminal Code (public calls for terrorism) to part 1 of Article 282 (excitement of hatred or enmity).

The question of whether to appoint the Politsyk the total term by full or partial addition of a new sentence with a sentence in the previous case, the prosecutor left the court at the discretion. Usually, in such cases, the final punishment is imposed by partial addition of sentences. The eight -year term, served by Kvachkov in the second case, expires in December 2018.

The prosecutor spoke with his speech on August 4, but the information appeared in the media only a week and a half later, after the performances of lawyers.

Defenders declared Kvachkov’s innocence and demanded an acquittal. In particular, lawyer Sergei Orlov noted that the political prisoner did not give instructions to publish a video message on the Internet, which became the reason for initiating a third case.

Orlov also emphasized that the pursuit of Kvachkov should be discontinued on formal grounds. Part 1 of Article 282 of the Criminal Code provides for a more severe punishment than part 1 of Article 205.2, and this worsens the procedural position of the defendant, the defender noted. At the same time, he recalled, the prosecutor has already refused the prosecution under Article 205.2.

What is the basis of this statement by Orlov is not clear. Part 1 of Article 282 as amended at the time that the video is dated to provide up to four years of the colony, while the maximum punishment under Part 1 of Article 205.2 - five years.

At the end of the debate on Tuesday, Kvachkov made the last word. The agency does not transmit its content. As previously reported, Politzek does not plead guilty.

The verdict will be announced on Friday, August 18.

Kvachkov became known about the third case in March 2016. The investigation led UFSB in Mordovia.

The reason for the initiation of the case was the publication on YouTube Video Back of Kvachkov, recorded on a mobile phone in June 2015 in the IK-5 of a strict regime for former security forces in the village of Lepley of the Zubovo-Polyansky district of Mordovia. As reported, another prisoner of the colony sent the file to the supporters of Kvachkov by mail, and they published a video on the Internet called "Kvachkov in IK-5, Mordovia." According to the "faces", we are talking about a video also known as "Comments of Colonel Kvachkov on the situation of Russian nationalists in prisons."

Who exactly placed the file, the FSB, as follows from the publication of TASS, did not establish. Whether the IK-5 prisoner was established and prosecuted, who, according to the plot of the case, sent the video to the supporters of Kvachkov, was not reported.

The accusation stated that "in his video message, Kvachkov publicly calls on an indefinite circle of persons to commit forced seizure of state power in the Russian Federation, that is, to carry out terrorist activities."

Politsyk himself, in the investigation, refused to testify.

The hearing in the case began on December 14, 2016. Whether Lednev leads the process alone or at the head of the judicial board, was not specified.

On January 20, 2017, experts involved in Kvachkov’s lawyers performed in the process - political scientists Stepan Sulakshin and Andrei Savelyev. Sulakshin is a former general director of the Center for Problem Analysis and Public Management Design. He was fired in April 2013 after the publication of a report on falsifications in the 2011 elections to the State Duma. Saveliev is the leader of the Great Russia party. In 2003-2007, he was a deputy of the State Duma; He was in the Rodina fraction.

Both experts watched a video message charged with Kvachkov, and there were no calls to terrorism in it.

After that, Judge Lednev said that a psychological linguistic study of the record conducted at the request of the investigation of the Mordovian laboratory of forensic examinations is incomplete, and appointed a new study at the Russian Federal Center for forensic examination under the Ministry of Justice. Before obtaining the results of the study,the trial was suspended .

The hearings resumed on July 10. As the Mediazona conveyed with reference to another lawyer Politzeck, Andrei Vikanov, a second examination did not see the Kvachkov calls for terrorism in the video message.

As we might assume, it was the results of a new study that became the reason that the prosecutor asked for retraining of the case.

In the second case, Kvachkov was detained in December 2010, the next day after a complete excuse in the case of the attempt on the oligarch Anatoly Chubais. In February 2013, the retired colonel was announced guilty of part 1 of Article 30 - Article 279 of the Criminal Code (preparation of the armed rebellion). It was claimed that activists of the Kvachov folk militia named after Minin and Pozharsky planned to seize power in the city of Kovrov of the Vladimir region, and from there to move to Moscow. Politzek himself said that he was preparing partisans in case of war with a foreign aggressor. At the same time, in court, he defended the right to an uprising.

Kvachkov is 69 years old, and he suffers from cancer. Meanwhile, in the Mordovian IK-5 on the Politzeck regularly imposed on far-fetched reasons. He was repeatedly placed in a schizo, then transferred to Belaruson (a detachment of strict conditions for serving a sentence), and in August 2015 he was sent to the PCT (a chamber -type premises - an internal prison of a colony).

At the time of participation in court, Kvachkov was transferred to Samara SIZO-1.