Love and "death of Stalin"

Hit with choral singing on drug addiction, extremism and crime. Shchedrin, Belinsky, Nekrasov, Turgenev, Ostrovsky, when studying at school, confront special control . Matilde in the sensational blockbuster to cover the chest and release in this form on the screens.

Scattered excerpts from the speeches of Pavel Zvelilo, a former racket, now the chairman of the Public Council under the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, reveal in him a peacekeeper and a patriot, and a peacekeeper and a patriot of the true. A person of balanced judgments, who does not like cruel punishment and stupid prohibitions. Well, you must admit, if compatriots begin to fill their leisure unanimous singing, as the Executive Director of the All -Russian Choral Society offers them, then they will not even have time for all kinds of offenses. If you comb the classics, then it is quite possible to go to school, not being afraid that the children after Saltykov will hate our orders or go drown in the river, following the heroine of the "thunderstorms". And so the children will finally hate school, but this is not a problem. As for Matilda, if it is to react from all sides, tie a scarf on the head and give a shovel into his hands, then an annoying episode from the life of the Martyr king will gain the right hagiographic features. As a result, no one will go to watch a film about such a ballerina and a religious conflict with elements of terrorism will resolve by itself.

In general, at present, Pavel Anatolyevich is a patriot like enviable, rare, old -fashioned in a good sense. Modern in a bad sense, and their darkness and darkness, more and more strive to ban books that they did not read, and burn cinemas, where they will twist a movie that they did not see. Eater, as if polemicing with his last name, goes the other way and fights with culture by much more civilized methods. A person is well -read, he knows exactly what this or that classic was guilty of the people and how to resist the slope, protecting the young tribe from it and destroying it in the bud. The master of a subtle compromise, he sometimes gives priceless tips, and when the director and other fans of scandals listened to him, it is scary to even imagine how grace came.

Those annoying miss that recently made one of the best, talented ministers of the Ministry of Culture in an interview with the BBC Russian correspondent. That is, in general, he said everything correctly, in full accordance with his patriotic line. Any Zvel was asked what he thinks about the prospects of rental in the Russian Federation a couple of weeks ago the British satirical comedy “Death of Stalin”, and Pavel Anatolyevich strictly spoke about the “denigration” of our history, about the leader of the peoples who “draw in a playful tone is inappropriate”, about the “cultural intervention” of the West, as well as about the “low -grade cranberries”. In the presence of any of these obvious signs of "provocation", he said, experts will not recommend the authorities to give the film a rental certificate. Yes, and the Communists can be indignant and, if they will not listen to them, "go to extreme measures." And the satire on Stalin outlined, Russophobia, cranberries and anti -communism, reassured the British Zatigailo, will miss the examination, and this would be limited to him, answering questions. But, unfortunately, the head of the council told them something else.

“If the film has a hint of some kind of love of Joseph Vissarionovich and Nikita Sergeyevich, this is practiced in Western films, then it will probably not be very acceptable,” he said, and this sounded with a dissonance after all his wise and patriotic speeches. This was saddened for at least two reasons. Firstly, in Western, and in world cinematography, scenes depicting the act of copulation of two leaders of the Soviet state are still not shot. It is all the more inappropriate to say that such plots are "practiced" there. Secondly, and the main ones, the act of copulation of the two leaders of the Soviet state is depicted in a classic work of modern Russian prose, which Zvelyo is simply ashamed to not know or crazy to silently. We are the first and only here, and, recognizing the enemies for the enemies, the priority to depict the act of copulation of two leaders of the Soviet state, the former racket makes us doubt both its patriotism and its well -read.

And this gives rise to a question that the BBC will not ask, only we ourselves, with longing and despair: where, citizens, are we rolling? It would be okay to disagree some or the National Passioner who wished to slander Russian literature and its history, but they just read and quote all the time to the One Sorokin, wake up at night, and every day more and more often. In large pieces, by heart, since the reality behind the windows sometimes verbatim coincides with fiction, or even surpasses the imagination of the writer. On the contrary, Pavel Anatolyevich, the peacemaker of federal significance and Patriot Square, suddenly breaks away from his native soil and in the polemic with ill -wishers renounces our victories. Under Stalin, they even shot for this.

So it creeps in involuntarily and a very inconsolable thought. The fact that he was not mistaken, inferior to the British our original, but showed his true face. But then it turns out that he is also an enemy - a hidden, insidious, under the mask of a patriot, from which you do not expect a trick, and suddenly he take and give the enemies to the enemies the most precious thing we have - the “ blue lard ” of the writer Sorokin. Joseph Vissarionovich and Nikita Sergeyevich, beloved heroes. All this certainly smells of treason, and to whom, tell me, to believe, if the chairman of the Public Council under the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, a person who has born and grew up in Russia, does not love his nature? Doesn't understand her beauty? Her pouring meadows? Morning forest? Endless fields? Nightingale night trenches? Autumn leaf fall? First Powder? July hayfield? Steppe open spaces? Russian song? Russian character? It is not clear how to continue to live with this.