
The doctoral dissertation of Vladimir Medinsky has long occupied the audience (we simply cannot refer to all reviews of “quotes of freedom”, but here is the previous one ).
And now, although the Minister of Culture managed to resist the consideration of the case at the University of Belgorod, the Higher School of Economic Council still recommends depriving the Medina degree.
Wow, this is the news, rare and so joyful in today's times. The crook and thief Medinsky is deprived of the degree! https://t.co/7h1erklb4w
- Leonid Volkov (@leonidvolkov) October 2, 2017
Minister of Culture Medinsky everything, he was deprived of the scientific degree of Fiasco, brother
- Dvach (@ru2ch) October 2, 2017
ISIS took responsibility for the deprivation of a median degree.
- sanctions fruit (@buddy_judge) October 2, 2017
They say Medinsky was deprived of excess chromosome
- Fields behind the hill (@lndcalling) October 2, 2017
Well, finally, what was supposed to happen.
Just the Expert Council of the Higher Attestation Commission on History by the overwhelming majority of votes decided, contrary to the conclusion of the Belgorod Council, to support our statement on the deprivation of the Medina degree of the Doctor of Historical Sciences. The decision was announced in my presence, also at the meeting were representatives of Medinsky - soft, Averyanov and Chernyakhovsky.
In ancient times, the Hindus had a good literary epithet - "Remembering the duty of the noble" (Satam Dharmam Anusmran). Today it is about the expert council of the Higher Attestation Commission. Not everything is rotten with us, no matter how much the authorities would like to believe in the opposite.
The Expert Council of the Higher Attestation Commission has advocated the deprivation of Medinsky doctoral degree. This is only an expert council. The Presidium of the Higher Attestation Commission must affirm unheard of courage. Maybe this will not happen, and the presidium will vote against the Expert Council, although it will be an unprecedented case, or - another option - the presidium will perform in the same way as experts, but the authorities will swim by scientists and non -flow of Medinsky sciences and prime minister. But even then, on October 2, 2017, it will remain a historical day: the circular guarantee of ignorance gave a failure. And this is the main scrap, everything is standing on it. God will give, and other scrapers will be just as short -lived.
October 2 - Day of Russian Science.
Freedom - with a clear conscience.
It is necessary to immediately drink for the expert council of the Higher Attestation Commission on History! Well done! Not shameful!
Medinsky showed his true place. Hooray
The conclusion of the Expert Council of the Higher Attestation Commission confirms that from the Medinsky scientist-historian, like from "shit> bullet.
A small loss for one minister, but a big loss for all historical science (.
It seems to me that we are present at an important moment: the Russian community has managed to defend the dignity of their profession and put in place an illiterate and impudent impostor.
Everything is seriously. Ek took up the ministry and its resources - this, of course, is the first thought. Second: Dissernet - heroes and great people. Thanks to them, even those who, last think about it, serve as a triumph of truth, but think about their situational hardware stupidities. For at the current stage of internal political competition there are no invulnerable competition - therefore, an expensive civil society, there are no unattainable goals.
How much is still in the Russian history of the “mysticism of names”: the Minister of Education of Uvarov (“Orthodoxy of autocracy, nationality”) after a hundred years suddenly, as the White Swan hit the floor, and turned into the chairman of the Vak with historian Uvarov - and cut off his doctoral dissertation to the “Minister of Education” (which is now “autocracy, Orthodoxy, nationality”).
And our Minister of Culture was still deprived of the title of Doctor of Sciences. The title was selected.
“So the Uncle Vova came across a couple on him.” (says Vaska). Maybe he pulled cognac at his party. Or he did something else. Curbilled to member - about excess chromosome for example. And so they would not have been deprived - they have a plan. So many candidates are so many doctors. To whom to give the hero and whom to shoot: everything according to plan.
This is how everything will fall at once. Las Vegas, Catalonia, Medvedev with Kadil, the weather is crazy and is restless in his soul, the mood is nasty.
And then, suddenly, you read - Medinsky was deprived of the degree of the doctor - and immediately the life of the paint again begins to gain.
Well, not deprived, not yet.
Well, indeed - many run ahead and think that Medinsky is no longer a doctor of sciences. But this decision is made by the following instance.
Relax, no one deprived the doctor of historical sciences.
The Expert Council of the Higher Attestation Commission only recommended to deprive it of its degree.
Do not read liberal newspapers after lunch.
The decision on Medinsky is the response of the legged part of the Academy from those who hold on. But the battle is not finished.
The Presidium of the Higher Attestation Commission (the final step) usually approves the recommendations of the Expert Council, but let's see, there may really be surprises
No matter how further the fate of the dissert of the doctor of the medical (will/will beat off) the decision of the expert council of the VAK is incredibly important. Any pressure has a limit - a scientific conscience. And the elections to the Academy about the same. Somewhere our underwater limit is being used.
Everyone is asking, what will happen next with Medinsky? Could it be that he will be justified on the presidium? I answer.
Everything is possible in our country. It is possible that tomorrow every disserter will fall a brick on his head. It is possible that Medinsky mines the Higher Attestation Committee on the day of the meeting of the Presidium. Perhaps Madame V. will drive out of the Presidium after the Gelfand of all other reasonable people. In the case of such a force majeure of Medinsky, they will not only not deprive the degree, but will also be elected academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
In all other cases - without decimation of the Presidium and burning of the Vaca, without another brutal force majeure, I do not see the slightest opportunity to justify it.
The minister had a small support group.
I do not understand those who rejoice at the attack on Medinsky. Medinsky deposited myths about Russia and Russians, including in the Second World War, and in early history
- Alexander Grishin (@orgstruk) October 3, 2017
The guys were deprived of a median degree not because he was obscurant, but because someone marks his place. That's all. So don't enjoy especially
- Economics of the Russian Federation (@PutinSeconomy) October 3, 2017
If it was not about the minister, but about an ordinary historian, and the disserter would not say words, and there would be no noise. Those. It's not about the dissertation, but the author
- Alexander Hinshtein (@khinshtein) October 2, 2017
No one undertook to challenge her at the peak of Dissernet's activity, in the early years of the Minister of Culture. Why now? The elections are approaching? https://t.co/vtk3maj83r
- Artem Klyushin (@artem_klyushin) October 2, 2017
The removal of the degree from the current Dr. Medinsky obviously took place due to the defamation campaign started from the outside of the Academy and exclusively for political reasons. Only on the basis of this fact it is necessary to defend Medinsky from attacks. This is a matter of autonomy of the academic field.
I would generally bring such a item to the Higher Attestation Commission - if the facts of extra -scientific persecution of scientists to impose a veto to deprive their degrees.
Something similar exists in the world of non -state associations. For example, in the UEFA regulations, there is a paragraph according to which any state intervention in the activities of the National Federation automatically leads to the suspension of the membership of this federation in the European Football Federation. In science, it is necessary to do something similar - as soon as it turns out that a campaign for the pursuit of the scientist on non -scientific grounds begins on the part of the employees of a particular academic structure, this structure is deprived of the right to protect scientific degrees. For example, by suspension of the activities of dissertation councils.
And yet. If you remove the doctor’s degree from Medinsky for the low quality of the dissertation, then, in fact, you will have to remove the doctoral degree from a huge number of doctors. And not only because the question of the quality of the text is usually an extremely debatable question within the academy itself, but also due to the fact that a really huge number of doctorals is written by "Negro", since the status of a doctor usually has an administrative value than scientific. The degree of the doctor functions as a kind of certificate from the institution, which denotes the lack of a ban on replacing a vacant position. The degree of a doctor in the Russian Federation often has nothing to do with science.
About the dissertation of the Minister of Medinsky (who was recommended to deprive the degree in the VAK) once again I repeat. The meaning of the claims to the text of Mr. Minister of serious people (and not just strange people with beautiful surnames, who were a fire of the world revolution and inflated) came down to the fact that this text categorically does not meet the requirements that are presented to doctoral dissertations and scientific works in the specialty in principle.
Something: an non -critical approach to sources, the use of translations (!!) of original texts during work, a false setting of the problem (not related to the actual scientific problem, but more passing in terms of journalism), the operation of only a small part of the source base, the lack of an idea of the state of modern historiography on the topic. For such sins, people are not like dissertations - they do not give diplomas. Well, or give a trosky from pity.
It's not that Patriot is Medinsky and not that his critics are “liberals”. The fact is that there are “patriotism” of the author in the text, and experts did not see any scientific competencies in it.
It is worried about how many freeds expressed an assumption or even confidence that the decision of the expert council of Vak in Medinsky - part of some kind of intrigue, was accepted by the go -ahead, etc.
Many refuse subjectivity, the possibilities of independent action by anyone, except for the "Tower of the Kremlin", of which everything supposedly comes.
Meanwhile, the current ES Vaka on history was formed again after Dissergate in early 2013 (this is even before Dissernet), and it included professional historians who were not seen in the participation of the Russian authorities at the request of the authorities. Why not assume that their attitude towards Medinsky really coincides with the opinion of most professionals, and that they felt like the last bastion?
It is not necessary to immediately level any correct decision of a person or institute, entering the power bargain - society has subjectivity and can make its decisions. It is important that scientists show an example (it is not for nothing that many remembered the elections of the President of the Russian Academy of Sciences).
Do what you should, and let it be as it will be.
The Minister of Education Olga Vasilieva said that there is no plagiarism in the works of Medinsky, and in the dissertation he presented "his vision of history."
A very important point is the lack of plagiarism, says Olga Vasilieva.
Lord, I'm sorry, where are they getting them at all ??? Medinsky is not accused of plagiarism!
The menist of the image of Vasilieva laid down by the Dessort Medinskavo.
It does not do without a pinch of conspiracyology.
Cool case with Medinsky. There is the "struggle of the towers", and Poklonskaya, and Mikhalkov, and the ears of Medvedev, and the influence of the Russian Orthodox Church, and, most likely, the force of the earth
- I'm wildly sorry (@traktor_bang) October 3, 2017
For Matilda, see
The story with an expert council proposed to select the degree from Medinsky, this is the story that the transition to the side of evil does not pay for itself and does not bring the cookies.
But resistance to evil - why not. If Medinsky took away the rental certificate from Matilda, referring to the fact that he could not allow him as a fighter with the mythologization of history ..., then all the attacks on the dissertation could be presented as revenge for this and, you look, defend the title.
Neither the liberals who have always hated him, nor patriots, for whom, after filling the bowl of patience, he is no different, is no different for him.
Generator of random conspiracy interpretations. Version 1. The forces of absolute evil (the sect of Matilda’s haters) were supported by the forces of ordinary commercial evil (the falsifier of history minister Medinsky) in the fight against the forces of good (Dissernet), thus punishing the derivation and inconsistency of the minister. But he still has a chance to return to the bosom of a pure uncompromising kingdom, and then the Higher Attestation Commission will not approve the decision.
Version 2. The forces of absolute evil (the haters of Matilda) did not support the forces of ordinary evil (Minister Medinsky) in the fight against the forces of good (e), trying to dump the minister of Mamon and replace him with the ministerial post with a follower of the pure and uncompromising kingdom.
The decision of the expert council of the Higher Attestation Commission on Medinsky was specially made to distract us from the court over Navalny. The authorities are hiding!
Meanwhile, the fate of the dissertation obviously raises the question of the ministerial portfolio. And here, oddly enough, the public has much more pessimism.
The Expert Council of the Higher Attestation Commission on History supported the deprivation of a Medine scientific degree ... I really hope that the seats of the Ministry of Culture of Medinsky will be deprived !!
- Kremlin (@znaetymka) October 2, 2017
Now Medinsky will be kicked out of ministers with shame! And they will appoint Poklonskaya.
- Dmitry Kolezev (@kolezev) October 2, 2017
Here Medinsky will retume, and in the framework of the struggle for more women in the government, the main in culture of Yampolskaya will become.
And <what> are you so rejoicing that the <moi> these from the wak want to deprive Medinsky doctoral? This only means that they were indicated for it. They did not even allow, namely asked. And then the minister will wet. Wait at this place Poklonskaya, Yampolskaya. Another guard. In a year, Volodya will seem to you a person of the Renaissance.
Although I stand for Valuev, his appearance is more spiritualized. The Minister of Culture should be such that he looked at him - and as if Zvyagintseva’s film watched.
The culprit of the celebration himself did not give comments. “I can’t comment, I was not there,” he said during a working trip to Turkmenistan.
Think about what modesty. But the problems of Russian history of the XV-XVII centuries were not embarrassed to comment. Yes, and Dubosekovo’s travel in the 41st did not have it - but also commented.


Social Networks Editor Radio Liberty