Let go, it

Correcting the assessment in an electronic diary within a month, the schoolboy did not even suspect that he could go to bars - for two years

In October 2016, Vladimir J. received a login from his classmate and the password of the administrator of the class electronic diary. In a month, he fixed 51 assessment of himself and another classmates. Simple prank, but in the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the Novosibirsk Region this is not called 51 assessment, but 51 episode of the modification of information data: part 1 of Article 272 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Unlawful access to computer information”. Therefore, both - Vladimir J. and his acquaintance - are now under subscription about the lower room. A criminal case was opened in September 2017, after the graduation ball. On November 1, the case was transferred to court.

The admitting guilt, Vladimir has not yet gives “testimonies” in the media, is afraid.

- I will not comment, because I have some plans that may be violated. The maximum that I can say: I am subjected to good such impact on the part of the media.

A note about the young "cybercriminator" instantly scattered in the information space. Everything was spinning the topic, but deeper than “for fives will be imprisoned for two years,” no one succeeds, too little information. In many ways, the facts are confused because of this. For example, Kommersant writes that Vladimir was expelled from school, although he calmly finished off and entered a prestigious university.

The classmates of Vladimir are also silent, hiding behind the iron rule of “do not harm”. Only the student from the parallel says that no one expected a serious punishment, everything was perceived as a prank. That the paper journal, that electronic - there is no much difference for schoolchildren. And adolescents are always treated as a slight offense (maximum punishment - a call to the school to school). But law enforcement officers considered innocent hooliganism by a criminal offense. "Diary.ru" is really protected by law, but ...

“The offense is disproportionate to punishment,” said Major FSIN in retired Svetlana Kachalina. - Yes, was a hack (an electronic diary). But everything can be canceled and put in order without interfering with judicial structures. I don't think he is some scoundrel. It is necessary to proceed from what harm he did. There are no consequences for the state system, for the Ministry of Education, for the university and school too. Law enforcement agencies are afraid of everything, do minor cases and pass by those crimes that are obviously upstairs. This is my subjective opinion. The boy remains to collect characteristics and hope for a smart lawyer.

Check the "accomplice" of Vladimir. How the student managed to get to the input data of the class administrator is unknown. The investigation is confirmed only by the presence of a downloaded program reading the code for fingerprints.

Another thing is important: almost any schoolboy can familiarize himself with the relevant instructions on YouTube and try to get into the electronic system without even suspecting the consequences.

- All vulnerable sites are in an accessible form. Creaching the site is easy. The same keyboard interceptor, which the schoolboy probably used, works simply. In general, do not offend the student so much. It is necessary to offend the system administrator, which allows you to put someone else's software on your computer or leaves the office without blocking it. In general, I have a double impression. The law is one for all. Hacking is perfect, and it doesn’t matter, the Ministry of Defense is a Pentagon or a school diary. It is important to improve the qualifications of employees, ”the Stanislav Novosibirsk Softic Company shares the Novosibirsk Softic Company.

Stanislav notes that schools need an educational program under federal laws affecting the IT sphere.

“Our case belongs to the section“ Crimes against public security and public order, ”says Cyril T. Cyril lawyer-the harm is that the student modified the information that was closed to him. But property damage did not occur, this will also be taken into account when sentencing. In addition, the question is to the school-it was not from the air that he took out this password, perhaps one of the teachers allowed a miss. Of course, the minor will not be given a real term. On the other hand, in jurisprudence there is such a thing: “General prevention”-so that other persons, seeing how they punish someone, do not commit such acts. Maybe this is exactly the case.

The date of the beginning of the judicial investigation will become known in the coming days.

Victoria Malkova - especially for "New", Novosibirsk