Attack with unsuitable means

How the IC of the Russian Federation made a chemist Rodchenkov who exposed the Russian doping program "scapegoat"

Russia decided on a counting case only when the threat of missing the Olympics in Pyeongchang became quite real. At the beginning of the week they were waiting for news from Lausanne about the new disqualifications of the Russian Olympians, and flew from Moscow. The Investigative Committee of Russia published the preliminary results of its investigation, according to which Richard McLaren's report and everything that followed him was “refuted” at all points. In Lausanne, however, this bomb was not noticed.

Not only did the investigation of the Investigative Committee on the Stone did not leave McLaren from the report - it exposed Grigory Rodchenkov, who gave rise to him, which remains only to catch and punish. There was nothing. Neither doping industry substitutions during the Sochi Olympiad, nor the mass use of doping by Russian athletes, nor holes in the wall of the anti-doping laboratory, nor criminal scratches in containers, nor abnormal indicators in biomaterials, nor even the existence of some state doping system and hideure-ni-c. And there is only a villain Rodchenkov, who, according to the aphoristic commentary of Vitaly Mutko, "for personal purposes, made out, distributed, covered."

Actually, such a result of the Russian investigation “New” was anticipated a year and a half ago, when the “Rodchenkov case” only began to spin. If there is someone to hang all the dogs on, then they will be hanged, and the figure turned out to be the most suitable - a defector, a two -minist, on which there is no place to put stigma, lifting with three boxes to save his skin. He fed our valiant heroes under the guise of vitamins “all sorts of nasty things”, exposing their health, and life itself, danger - for which in October was put on the international wanted list, and now the accusation was supplemented and the conclusions of the UK.

Indeed, to whom to believe, not quite an adequate former genius-farmacologist or conscientious witnesses of 700 people surveyed during the investigation? As stated in the statement of the Investigative Committee, "none of them confirmed the existence of a certain doping program." True, if there were such as those who were responsible for those who were also asked by workers-builders, then what could they answer? Yes, and all witnesses, regardless of rank and awareness, would the enemies begin to confirm what is now pulling on the criminal?

But this is so, little things. We will take on the faith that there was nothing to confirm, and I came up with all Rodchenkov - from the “cocktails” to the hole in the wall, from salt added to the substitution of certain FSB officers. Then what to blame him for, except for lies? Or is that for the sake of its own benefit, he personally created his system exclusively, which became individual Russian athletes victims, and Russia was subjected to an unprecedented sports and political attack?

The inconsistency is obtained with Rodchenkov, wherever you throw it. Starting with the fact that his “cocktails” based on three types of anabolics are not a myth at all. According to anonymous confessions that were not included in the Dossier SK, there were three jars with “pills” and recommendations - there were.

And they were used - not everyone, but used. And someone (not Rodchenkov, why did he need to glow once again) and handed them away-it means that at least it was partly in the know. And someone, according to the specific lists of the chief defendant, was supposed to be insured against Sochi samples, and even how it was carried out and how much someone was bombarded-no commission will figure it out.

What personal financial benefits could Rodchenkov have from their manipulations before and during Sochi-2014? The rollback from the premium for medals is too obvious stupidity, given the anonymity and strict conspiracy. Vanity, satisfied on the basis of the same anonymity - is like not about Rodchenkov.

They thought that enough of the order. For Sochi-2014. Someone included Grigory Rodchenkov in the list of awarded. Someone even earlier gave a card blanche to a man convicted of uncleanness seven years ago. Someone allowed him to experiment. Where are the names of these defendants? Or are the same people now outraged that Rodchenkov deceived them, exceeded the limits of their own powers, causing serious harm to the state?

De facto judges Rodchenkov not for deceiving the poor and innocent athletes, but in fact, for the disclosure of secrets. Maybe even state. And this is not only in Russia, they understand, because they will never be given it.

And in Lausanne, everything will go as a turn for the verdict in Pyeongchang, which they promise to voice in early December.