
Natalia Pinus
There are serious questions for the financial model, as well as to the project in terms of placement of the fourth bridge and planned transport interchanges. It seems that its implementation in this form can lead to transport collapses, said the deputy of the City Council of Novosibirsk Natalya Pinus.
The grain of the issue is now that on December 6, the concession agreement on the bridge should be signed. The development of this agreement is carried out closed.
As we see on the example of a garbage concession , it is almost impossible to make changes to concession agreements (there is an extremely insignificant list of factors by which can be concluded).
That is, to change something in the concession agreement after its signing will not actually be. The agreement can only be terminated. I wonder what penalties with?
And another question. We all understand that the bridge is needed. We are told that if we abandon this bridge now, then it is not at all the fact that we will be invited to finance another project of the bridge in the near future. To agree or not to this project, to which, to put it mildly, there are many questions?
In my opinion, given the depth of doubt, one cannot agree. If we build such a bridge with such interchanges according to such a financial scheme, then we will definitely deprive ourselves of the opportunity for a long time to implement another project.
Let's see what the answers of the Ministry of Transport and designers will be to the complex of formed questions. In a good way, they would show the draft concession agreement, and everything would become clear, because in words the numbers and technological solutions are regularly called different.