Igor Klyamkin: "authoritarian inertia"

“I listened to Yavlinsky in Pozner. It was a little better to understand why Russian politicians were not interested in the experience of Ukrainian Reformation,” writes Facebook vice -president of the Liberal Mission Foundation.

“In Ukraine, the president may not be all, he is limited by parliament in decisions - including the association required by the European Union with which Ukraine. Posner asked Grigory Alekseevich how he intends to fulfill his promise to cancel all repressive laws adopted in recent years: after all, a parliamentary consent will be needed for this.

Grigory Alekseevich replied that the deputies will certainly agree with any president, whoever they may be. Posner also asked as a contender for the presidential post, becoming the president, he would prohibit anti -Ukrainian propaganda on television, which the applicant is also promising. Answer: Who wants to stay on television, they will stop.

It is clear that with such an installation, Ukraine, where almost all private television channels are not controlled by the president, cannot be of interest. As well as Ukrainian parliamentarism is not the best in the world, but still parliamentarism.

Authoritarian inertia reports in Russia over the most convinced and consistent critics of authoritarianism. "