For Ulyukaev, they requested 10 years of strict regime

In the debate of the parties in the case of the former head of the Ministry of Economic Development, Alexei Ulyukaev, accused of extorting a bribe of $ 2 million from the chief executive director of Rosneft, Igor Sechin, prosecutor Boris Holly demanded 10 years of strict regime for the defendant. It is reported by "Mediazona".

As an additional punishment, the immune requested a fine of 500 million rubles for the defendant. In addition, he demanded to deprive Ulyukaev of the class rank of the actual state adviser, orders "For Merit to the Fatherland" IV and III degrees and the Order of Honor, as well as to ban the former minister 10 years after the dismissal to occupy positions in government agencies.

The second prosecutor working in the process, Pavel Filipchuk, supported the requirements of the immight.

Next, the lawyers took the word.

Ulyukaev is charged with part 6 of Article 290 of the Criminal Code (receiving a bribe by public servants on an especially large amount with extortion), which provides from 8 to 15 years of the colony. According to the plot of the case, the official demanded that Rosneft have money for the legitimate issuance of a positive conclusion and evaluate "regarding the purchase of a state stake in Bashneft with this company. Otherwise, the accusation claims, he threatened to create obstacles to the work of Rosneft.

On the evening of November 14, 2016, FSB operatives detained the official at the headquarters of the state-owned company after meeting with Sechin. At this meeting, the head of Rosneft in the presence of vice -president - the head of the company's security service, General of the FSB Oleg Feoktistov handed Ulyukaev a bag, where, as it turned out after the detention of the minister, there were $ 2 million. According to Ulyukaev himself, he was sure that the bottle of wine was in the bag. Sechin personally led a hidden audio recording of the conversation.

Ulyukaev is placed under house arrest. Hearing on the merits of his affairs continues on August 16. The process is conducted by the judge of the Zamoskvoretsky district court of Moscow Larisa Semenova. At the first meeting, the defendant accused Sechin and Feoktistov of provoking a bribe. Ulyukaev also announced a provocation arranged by Sichin during the judicial investigation, during interrogation on November 27.

Sechin was sent for four times to the court for interrogation in the Ulyukaev case, but he ignored all four summons, each time referring to employment in Rosneft. The fifth time, Judge Semenov, at the hearing, refused the fifth time to call the head of Rosneft. At the same time, she refused the prosecutors who achieved the testimony of Sechin, given the investigation in court. Thus, the prosecutors in the debate could operate with the testimony of the head of Rosneft - the key witness of the prosecution. The main witness was Feoktistov, interrogated in closed mode on September 20.

Earlier on Monday, the BBC, with reference to the transcript of this interrogation , set out the testimony of Feoktistov . The security officer said that it was he who found $ 2 million to transfer to Ulyukaev. According to the general, colleagues from the FSB informed him of the need to conduct an “operational experiment” and instructed to find cash for him. This money, according to Feoktistov, he "asked his good acquaintance, a private investor." “Without explaining to him the reasons: he still does not know why this money,” the general assured. The name of the "good friend" did not appear in the publication.

The investor continued Feoktistov, brought him 2 million to the headquarters of Rosneft. “I also took them to the corresponding unit of the security service, where I transferred them to the employee according to the act,” said the security forces.

On the morning of November 14, 2016, FSB operatives again brought money to Rosneft. One of the visitors, Feoktistov said, instructed Sechin how to behave during a meeting with the Minister. The operative advised the head of Rosneft, "so that the line (his) behavior was absolutely normal" and "so that there were no provocations." The fact that it was to say to Ulyukaev that visitsers did not give recommendations to Sichin, concluded Feoktists.

As noted in the publication, Sechin himself, in his testimonies, also reported that Feoktistov was engaged in the search for money for an “operational experiment”.

According to the case file, the publication also says, it was the Feoktistov who compiled a denunciation of Ulyukaev - Sechin only signed this paper.