Translated material
Consistent Hell
Ksenia Sobchak again came to the federal channel - this time in the program "Time will tell."
Do not be surprised that its very appearance in this kind of programs is already alarming many.
Ksenia Sobchak now on Channel One pulled out a stool and says that she is an independent candidate. It is so good that we live in a free country where everyone can become a presidential candidate and come to the federal channel. Navalny, right?!
- Stalingulag (@stalingulag) December 11, 2017
Yes. I am not called the first channel. They probably want to just get through to https://t.co/xolxct6R7M
- Alexey Navalny (@navalny) December 11, 2017
Sobchak is now the main star "Time will tell." How to drag it on purpose. VGTRK, Channel One - you can’t blame this by chance. This is not just move on TV, it is bending the channels. Only the Kremlin has such a resource.
- Alexander Grishin (@orgstruk) December 11, 2017
However, the audience notes two things: the open rudeness of the leading and the calm, worthy of the manner of holding on to Sobchak.
I watch the "Channel One", the transfer with Ksenia Sobchak. You know, she is awesome.
- anastasia zotova (@anasta_zotova) December 11, 2017
He looked “Time will tell” with Sobchak on Channel One. With all my deep disrespect for this lady, how the leading Channel One was shouting is just a shame and unprofessionalism.
- Shota Gorgadze (@gorgadze_shota) December 12, 2017
These two imbeciles generally should be driven from TV to Sobchak on the program, but they didn’t give her words to say why then? pic.twitter.com/i6VDF9JWKD
- Konstantin Petrov (@kostya3107) December 11, 2017
Sheinin did not come up with anything smarter than to arrange a clowning. It seems to them she is too tough for pic.twitter.com/xxcxvkwa0x
- Ivan Egorkin (@bugulr) December 12, 2017
I am for a civilized conversation, and not for the circus showed by the presenters, especially Sheinin. You are presenters, not clowns. #Time will show
- Bubnova Elena (@Bunyasha60) December 11, 2017
Suddenly for himself, Sobchak looked at Sheinin. She amazing her endurance, and she argues very reasonably. The presenters are a full bottom, of course.
- Vagif Abilov (@vagifabilov) December 13, 2017
Today I am lucky - I visited hell. Agree, not everyone is lucky to find out if there is life after life. Now I know for sure - there is. And it is called the “program“ time to tell ”on Channel One. Of course, I understood that some amazing things were happening there, I saw a bucket of “shit”, it brought it to the studio, but I didn’t think, “shit> seduced 😳Pasibo. This is an important and valuable lesson. Now I know exactly how you turned the most educated people in Europe into a fooled crowds. What kind of smart, responsive people became a bitten army because of you. Gopnikov, dreaming of the death of their neighbor, friend, brother. I saw it with my own eyes and now I know for sure that all this is not real. This is a mosquito, foam. This does not even need to be treated, you just need to screw the valve of your "shit -wire". And the next day people will wake up, as after a terrible dream, asking with horror and fear: was it all with us?
I never thought that you could lie so frankly, so shamelessly. What can be easily on the air can be issued by your editors in your own hardware texts for calling viewers. What can be shouted with an insulted person throughout the country that there was never nuclear weapons in Ukraine, that Ukraine and I did not have a friendship and cooperation agreement, that the pension in Russia was not 7600, but as much as 11300. Well, that's okay. I - perhaps - was ready for this. But to the fact that my own words that can be read right now in the public domain will not only be distorted or tended out of context, but in general they will be attributed to the words that I did not say! Look how the host, who, grinning, said that the country wants to know his opinion is ending the transmission. My quote. Where I say that "my brand is such a giant colossus with impenetrable armor from pathos and cynicism, inside which a little girl sits and presses on levers." After a series of rather stupid accusations, the presenter finishes the program: “But I did not read the end of the quote. Here it is: "And this whole machine was created exclusively for making money." The hall applauds, advertising begins, and I understand that I spoke completely different. I said "and I try very hard to overcome it" 😳
The leading Channel One behaves as absolutely cynical and vile scum.
This was seen by the whole country, and for this thanks to Ksenia Sobchak.
Question: What part of the country realized that they were leading scum, and what was on their side, neighing and applauding?
Nada was to conduct an urgent survey:
1) looked?
2) If you looked, then on whose side was it?
What are disgusting and small presenters! Sobchak respect for endurance and courage!
Just look at how Ksenia holds a blow. Few would have stood this Addishche. A rare diamond Ksenatol is, the highest sample and the cleanest water). The program is cooler than any action movie.
From insomnia and interest, he looked at the meeting of the candidate Sobchak with the leading Artem and the Vedasy Anatoly. <...>
In general, I would not risk any more at the site of the bosses. About the Kyiv junta and Saakashvili safer, and if about local affairs, then the people may ask where the money has gone.
At night, I overpowered myself and watched this broadcast completely. This is a heavy sight. I don’t know if you take a chance ... But if you are given it, it will become obvious: 1. The meaning of Ksenia’s decision to get into the fight is precisely this: to demonstrate the insignificance and panic of television leading leading leaders, long -worn from discussions, polemics and disputes in essence; 2. The point is to declare important critical claims to the authorities to the whole country from the screen (even if this is a drop in the sea of propaganda, but everything is better than nothing); 3. There is no such deformation of the format of television battles in any country in the world (this is to those who are always in a hurry to emphasize “yes everywhere like this, everyone is lying, everyone campaigns”) - so, no, such a shameful <print> is not in any country. Two not particularly gifted dude are trying to turn the transfer to clowning and humiliate the presidential candidate with cheap "jokes" and clown masks. I watch a lot of Western TV. I have never met such a disgrace. True, he watched the TV North Korea little.
Ksenia, when I tried to hear the answer at the dawn of your campaign why you need it, I did not believe it. Now I believed and tell you “thank you” that I decided. Thank you for fighting! Forces to you and courage in the fight against this darkness. The understanding that you are moving only within the framework in which you are allowed in any way will not discredit what you are trying to convey. Everything is not in vain.
With all the critical attitude to the nomination of Ksenia Sobchak, I can’t help but note: she holds a blow perfectly and knows how to publicly talk with villains. The girl’s psyche is strong. ))
So, citizens. Prepare your slop, but I will say it.
I looked here a few broadcasts with Ksenia Sobchak - rain, Soloviev, the first I don’t remember what else. And with each of these broadcasts, respect for Ksenia Sobchak only grew.
Everyone who has swept in my direction in my direction, I advise you to approach the mirror and listen to about 40 times from unfamiliar and acquaintances, what kind of person you are, a fool, a fool, a showman, no, Wumen, what a Kremlin project you are, you will not succeed, as you do not support you at all, what your anti -rating you have, to read all comments in social networks. And then right immediately, without stopping, not leading an eyebrow, under this background to tell aloud, why you are right and why you believe in what you say. Preferably, logical, coherently, without getting down from words, without falling into a hysteria.
A similar exercise is regularly done by starters who ask for money - everyone is told that they make complete garbage, and money - <no>.
By the way, the word "Navalny" sounded on the air of federal channels more often than in the last six years. Probably still both projects of the Kremlin (this is a joke, here you need not to fight, but to laugh)
Everything crawled off the stool and went to bed.
My dear friends.
Consider me an idiot, but after watching and listening to the battles (and this is precisely the fights, when the nerves at the limit) Ksenia Sobchak, where she was a sincere and truthful fighter, from different levels jerking the meaning of the meanings, made a preliminary decision to vote for it.
Like this. Maybe naive? But I can't help but support her ...
No one said so reasoned, and directly, and boldly (let her allow her) to a large audience, it doesn’t matter, but she says and hears her who have not heard this before her, did not see such a thing and did not believe that this is possible!
A drop of water sharpens the stone .... is corny, but the fact.
Ksenia Anatolyevna receives an additional portion of rudeness addressed in absentia in absentia.
After the broadcast on Channel One, Sobchak stated that “I visited hell.” Go to the Donbass, sit somewhere in Gorlovka in the basement, under the shells of Bandera, whom you, Ksyusha, love so much. Maybe this will be a paradise for you?
- Voice of Mordor (@spacelordrock) December 12, 2017
Sobchak about the air on the First Channel: I visited the Adunet, Ksenia Anatolyevna, all those few who were still waiting for you to hear at least an elementary idea of politics and economics once again visited hell. The lesson received for "evening with V. Solovyov" is not assimilated by you
- Armen Gasparyan (@a_gasparyan) December 12, 2017
Well, what are you, Ksenia, well, what hell is it! Yesterday you visited the circus :) It was there that and precisely because for almost two months now you have been organizing a circus with a “nomination to candidates”. This is the real clowning :))))) And if such a clowning against others is allowed, then why is it not allowed by others about you? :))) Is you unless you are staring with a serious expression on your face, and I honestly admit that you are staring, using clown causals :))) And I emphasize: it is about your “serious conversations” as a “political one. figures. " For I have never discussed or commented on your journalistic activity. <...>
And about hell, Ksenia, hell, you yourself created around and within yourself for several years. Very bright, frantic and enthusiastic. And there are a lot of succeeds in this. And hell, of course, will not let you go quickly ... but the circus for you is moving in the right direction from hell. Surely not everything is lost yet.
The fact that people became stupid and embittered Ksyusha is certainly not to blame, because she conducted intellectual programs of Dom-2 and a blonde in chocolate🤔. And then he is surprised, strange.
I accidentally saw the program “Time will tell” with the participation of Ksenia Sobchak.
Special Mizan Sciences: A young novice candidate stands in the center of the studio and screams like a merchant in the clothing market.
Ksenia is very nervous when he tries to broadcast about politics, and therefore, apparently, says absolute game. Even an harmless idea to bring to the president’s elections elements of the circus in the form of a “blonde in chocolate” destroys the image of a glamorous blonde and a serious attitude to the elections of the head of state.
You don’t have to be so nervous, Ksenia, you have a chance to entertain the audience, but becoming a politician - there is no chance. #Ksyush_nu_pori_ you
In an angry letter (regarding the program "Time will show"), Ksenia Sobchak is not clear one moment.
I quote: "Now I know exactly how in a short time you have turned the most educated people in Europe into a fanned crowds. As smart, kind, responsive people because of you have become an embittered army of gopniks, dreaming of the death of their neighbor, friend, brother."
The "most educated people in Europe" did we have in what year? In 2014? And became the "embittered army of gopniks"? ("Genetic Fraud" again in force). Was the "Crimean" to destroy the whole education? Oh, you.
Or still in 1991? And who turned the people into gopniks? Kuzichev and Sheinin then still served in the army, or recently demobilized; In general, no one was turned into anyone for sure.
Or in 2014? And why was he "the most educated"? This is generally not confirmed in any way, with nothing.
Really well educated in 1991, but there were completely different people to destroy the education system. Ksenia Anatolyevna, most likely, knows them personally. Or knew. And loves.
However, the enthusiasm of the opposition public has their own borders.
The scheme works brilliantly.
Ksenia came on the air of Malakhova (Russia-1) and said everything she thinks!
Hurray, applause.
Ksenia came on the air of Solovyev (Russia-1) said everything she thinks and at the same time washed Solovyev.
Hurray, applause.
Ksenia took the air to a couple of Skabeev spouses (Russia-1) said everything that she thinks and washed the Skabeevs.
Hurray, applause.
Ksenia came on the air of the gopniks from Channel One, said everything that she thinks and washed the gopniks from Channel One.
Hurray, stormy prolonged applause.
Finally brilliant. Brilliant! Under Ksenia, every time they cleanse an hour in these studios. Expand the entire ordinary party. They put her on the rostrum. They put their presenters against her, who have a wildly bad image in a liberal environment. Give this leading installation: let it speak out !!! Let him say what he wants. And you like arguing. But do not strain too much. Why one of the gopniks simply brings a clown pipe, overhead noses and is fooled by the entire broadcast. Ksenia is smart, we are idiots. Not a problem. Normal contract game.
And all this liberal community, which did not include a TV set, rushes to watch these shows. And rely! And rejoice! Cool Ksenia again washed the freaks! And post, post these links! It is so important that at least someone tells the truth on federal channels !! We vote for Ksenia !!!
Well, all goals have been achieved. All. Navalny is forgotten, in the presidential campaign, a violent revival, also furnished with “freedom of speech”, again state channels, which every time the “candidattage” is not in vnuad, Ksenia is always a guaranteed rating. As you can see, the new audience pulled up to the TVs. Also young!
The delight and gratitude of Ksenia for her stamina and courage reign among the liberal public. Victories over the gopniks completely covered this public to the question: and who always meets it to these gopniks? Who agrees on her voluminous broadcasts on the State Academy of Sciences, who sends her there, every time, of course, coordinating campaigns in Hell with herself?
Actually, I always understood that they were smart. But this time - judging by this reaction of quite healthy people - I am ready to admit that they are brilliant. You are a genius, Sergey Vladilenovich, and all yours.
Sergei Vladilenovich is still smart. In fact, apparently, I did not come off the people, but from our liberal intelligentsia, unlike Sergei Vladilenovich, he studied it well.
I'm all about Sobchak’s campaign on the Channel One. Listen, you really don't understand what her mission is? And you really don’t understand why she talks about Navalny? Her mission is to make a liberal flow shameful. What did you say before? Liberalism is Nemtsov, well, Chubais can sometimes be there. It is not that somehow it was good for public opinion, but it allowed, say, to Nemtsov to win the elections not in Moscow even, but in Yaroslavl. Again, the ATP took place in the Duma with Nemtsov and Chubais. And now whom? Well, Sobchak, which will definitely remember Dzhabrailov and Dom-2, and naked photo shoots. And this is quite clear in the patriarchal society. She mentions Navalny in order to connect and drown with herself. Grandmothers watch TV and they should work, Navalny does not offer a minimum salary of 25 thousand, but plays at the same time with Sobchak, so she said about it herself.
Those who liked Sobchak have already unsubscribed on Facebook. Everyone else liked the TV presenters, who I would hardly have even entered the floors, because they clearly fall into their audience. The target audience Sobchak generally watches a little TV, and even more so in working hours. If you think that the former presenter of the “House-2” will somehow enlighten the grandmothers, as they are represented, then you are mistaken.
So I congratulate Sergei Vladilenovich, his wiring is still working like a clock. The main thing here is to switch the liberal party and media -capacity to the pre -election period from Navalny to Sobchak. Listening to Crimea is much safer than about Panama offshore and other unpleasant things.
Ksenia Sobchak is very dignified on the air of central television channels. She is calm, daring, smart, with an excellent reaction, she cannot be confused. It can be heard even when the interviewers yell, hoot and grimace, in general, do what they should do - destroy the very idea of a normal conversation. In Russia, this television genre is called talk show.
The last broadcast on Channel One Sobchak spent brilliantly. And all the better her main problem was visible. Because the interlocutors do not care about her calm. They are all right, their strength is its gigantic anti -rating. Their task is not to let the public forget that in front of her is a rich girl from, as they will tell us, “show-world”, and for this they dragged a circus props with them. For them and for their curators, Sobchak is a safe candidate, Zhupel, know just do not forget to mock and blow in your clown dudel. And even if Facebook applauds her loudly-where many, I have no doubt, generally first saw these current shows and these presenters-this does not mean that on the other side of propaganda the same broadcast will be recorded as a defeat.
The authorities, struggling with its paranoid fear of Navalny with the help of S. (namely for this, was released on a political scene), is forced to invite her to the zombie, and i.e., to allow "the shaving of a lies of lies." Question: is it bad or good?
Don't know. Apparently, they believe that the "ordinary people" are quite zombie and will let Ksyushin "Truth-Matka" past the ears. Вы же, наверно, не особо прислушиваетесь к тому, какую пургу несёт с экрана какой-нибудь лидер парламентской партии...
В ленте периодически пишут, что Ксения Собчак - марионетка, потому что её пускают на федеральные каналы говорить и обличать. Я бы предположил, что она просто объективно очень удобная для АП фигура, а про прямой сговор можно будет говорить с долей уверенности только в том случае, если под неё снимут Явлинского, как под Прохорова шесть лет назад. А вообще это не имеет большого значения, естественно.
Четвертые сутки российский фейсбук восхищается мужеством Ксении Собчак. Ксения Анатольевна сходила на Первый канал - и открыла для себя реальность. Там всё врут - осознала Ксения Анатольевна. Это же <ужас> что такое! Так же нельзя! Это же какой-то зомбоящик!<...>
Еще до одной дошло, смотри-ка. На восемнадцатом году путинизма, после трех развязанных зомбоящиком войн.
Просто потрясающее знание реалий страны.
Мне кажется, этот общий инфантилизм уже в <конечной> стадии и больше не излечим.
Олег Кашин в свежей колонке для Republic вполне скептичен (полный текст доступен только подписчикам:
Когда был первый эфир на «России-1» у Андрея Малахова сразу после ее заявления о намерении поучаствовать в президентских выборах, это еще можно было списать на логистический сбой, ну в самом деле – они с Малаховым оба много лет работали примерно в одном и том же жанре телевизионного глянца, хорошо друг друга знают; конечно, он сам с удовольствием позвал ее к себе в программу, а что разрешили – ну так в газетах же писали, что о своем выдвижении она договаривалась с Владимиром Путиным, а у Путина ведь не уточнишь, зато есть риск, что если не пустишь ее в эфир, то она ему пожалуется, и полетят головы.
Примерно так можно было бы рассуждать, если бы эфир у Малахова был единственным, но нет же, после него Собчак побывала и у верховного жреца телепропаганды Владимира Соловьева, и у пары «красных хипстеров» Ольги Скабеевой и Евгения Попова, которым ради нее вообще пришлось менять формат своей программы, где практически никогда (однажды была Мария Захарова – и, кажется, все) не бывает единственного гостя, и, наконец, пришла к цирковой парочке Артема Шейнина и Анатолия Кузичева, которые вели себя с ней так странно, как будто слали телезрителям сигнал – мол, это не мы ее позвали, это нам ее навязали. И тут уже не придумать никакой благородной легенды, российское федеральное телевидение – это колония строгого режима, там шаг влево, шаг вправо встречает стрельбу без предупреждения, и, чтобы Собчак ходила из одного ток-шоу в другое, нужна слаженная совместная работа самых высокопоставленных (Алексей Громов?) чинов Администрации президента, первых лиц обоих главных каналов (Константин Эрнст и Олег Добродеев) и, очевидно, самой Ксении Собчак, которая, и это бросается в глаза, строго следует некоторым правилам, причем это касается не только продекларированного ей нейтралитета по отношению к Владимиру Путину лично, но и, например, темы Дмитрия Медведева – упомянув «домик для уточки», она не назвала его по имени, хотя это явно напрашивалось. Сам факт телевизионной активности Ксении Собчак снимает все вопросы по поводу того, кремлевский она кандидат или нет, – пелевинское правилотрех колец оцепления с пулеметами работает всегда, и здесь не имеет значения, кто и что говорит в кадре, потому что если человек попал в телевизор, то его туда прежде всего пустили, и это «пустили» и есть самая точная политическая характеристика, перечеркивающая всю содержательную часть.
-
Ivan Belyaev
Social Networks Editor Radio Liberty