Translated material
Alexander Plyushchev about Putin's press conference
About Felgenhauer, Sobchak, Navalny, journalists and Putin
About Tanya
Tanya asked yesterday a great question, held on and looked great. It is not about courage, but about the accuracy of the wording. Nobody still expected a normal answer from Putin, but still, he stood in the protective position “It seems to you that they put it unfairly, and the investigating authorities, which is fair, should understand the court, we will strengthen the judicial system.” But then: there is no violation of the law that Sechin did not come to court. That is, in this case, Putin's opinion is enough.
I note that the hall applauded her question, but Putin’s “answer” to him was not, but the broadcast director, probably a liberal saber, took, and showed Tanya’s face after a “answer”. It was worth a lot.
About Sobchak
Sobchak - well done. Not in the sense that now we must vote for it, but in the sense of working out your agenda in terms of competition with Navalny. Whether it likes it or not, but then she continues to score points. Yesterday Sobchak asked Putin almost as Navalny asked. He (like me) counted on a flash mob of several journalists, but Ksenia Anatolyevna spent him alone. Now Navalny has nothing to blame her for - she alone publicly defended him (however, her own) position. Moreover, it would be worth it to thank. But this is difficult, all the more so, everyone around is only talking about Sobchak, but not about Navalny. I don’t know if this is the merit of Sobchak, but in response to her question, Putin was directly opened in the dance, but more on that later.
About Navalny
Alexei, who thought about the need for journalists, suddenly turned to them. And they responded in a native. It was struck by how many comments were at Putin’s press conference, and even then the broadcast on Navalny.live. It was very similar to the Russian Foreign Ministry, which comments not only every step, but also every sneezer of “Western partners”, the independence of which he loves to emphasize. Some directly Kargo-cult. On the other hand, purely from the point of view of the show, I understand - whatever you talk about, and the audience is waiting for this. He became not only a politician, but also a showman - sorry, talk about what the audience wants.
Now I am late to write about Putin’s press conference, and the audience, go, forgot to think about it, I would like, for example, about Ulyukaev.
About journalists
Tanya already said everything. Well, ok, if the uncertain of the real candidate for the elections seems to you a problem of liberal party or you does not allow you to ask, well. You (your audience) are concerned about the problems of the region, and not the whole country - also norms, just tell about the most grandiose local that is happening in your region. Not for the king understood - he would never understand, and in order to show the country that what is happening with you is the widespread zid. Or Sykotny? Doesn't the authorities tell? Well then, you don’t need to about the liberal party and a garden ring.
About Putin
Putin is always trying to show that he, if not more informed (often, especially when there are no blankets with numbers at hand, he uses the design “I didn’t hear anything about it”), then, let’s say, “fed up” to the asking. But more and more often he frankly misses. We will not allow Navalny to the elections because he is Saakashvili. We have not yet come up with laws why our Saakashvili cannot be, so we will come up with some kind of crap, we will not condemn what we present and do not let us formally. Potin used to be shy to recognize this, now he has stopped. Be systematic, do not insert people into the streets, and we will find you some kind of place, you, Ksenia Anatolyevna, have found you. Although with reservations, albeit with difficulties, and who said that it will be easy. This was not pronounced, but it was heard. He is constantly trying to smear the offices, but it turns out to be worse. Sechin somehow dumbly waved, about the investigation along Nemtsov-he generally missed the ears. But the most anecdotal is an answer about a man with a cow who is judged for a GPS tracker for a cow. Actually, there are hundreds of such things, I personally know one of the defendants, maybe, remember, the guy in Tutaev bought a system of vision for the site. What does he answer? In general, Putin is told: your guardsmen really flew off the coils, Vladimir Vladimirovich. He says something about “we must adjust”, and then anyway, like it is probably to blame: “Either he must pay and does not pay, or did it somehow underground.” He believes that the use of GPS is paid or in a license? Is this such a president draw an image of the future?