Explanation of the position

This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.

About the conflict in the lyceum. To begin with, I have never supported me as many people like in all the practice as these days. Absolutely unfamiliar people call and thank just that I said that I think about this situation.

Of course, thanks to my widely known opponents - one ubiquitous lawyer and his best friend, whom I, in order to avoid misunderstandings, will call the ubiquitous tripsman. Together - ubiquitous.

The ubiquitous lawyer is because no matter how loud, well -known dispute arose on the vastness of the Vyatka Internet, everywhere he offers his services. The accident on the bridge, he is right there: “I will punish everyone ...”, they threw the monument to the landfill, he again: “I will deal with everyone ...”, they threw the dog out the window: “I will attract everyone ...”. It seems not drunk, but with aggression he boils like a grandmother's goat at the sight of the chairman. By the way, he forgets about most of his promises the next day.

The ubiquitous TRASMENT, because he lives by selling cakes, and climbs into all the affairs from cooking far away, like a dawn from a rooster. Moreover, truly in a cock of pride, he believes that there would be no dawn if he had not been cuckold.

But, to the conflict in the lyceum. Yes, no one can beat. I understand with my mind, but I also understand that I would not do otherwise. What else could an adult man do at the sight of a crying wife, a crying child and an impudent Hari, screaming: “Look into the camera!” Let's honestly - who would do otherwise?

In connection with the incident, I remembered that I had such situations in practice. For a long time, however, about ten years ago, when our current Minister of Education was still the director of the physical's office, there was a nuisance with an eleventeenth grader. Everything is exactly the same, and there was nothing left to study, four months. I acted in a completely different way than the ubiquitous, I just agreed on a meeting with Mikhail Vasilyevich, talked about ten minutes, even without parents, (I had a notarial power of attorney from them) simply talked and there was no conflict. I don’t know how he was, but I had the impression of him, as a smart and decent person. And Junior finished his studies, finished the Polytechnic, now works in a specialty.

True, no one wrote about this on the Internet. Probably, I had to tear the shirt, wait for me to be spitting, they would go into the horn, but if I could remove all this on the camera. That would be a victory!

I do not really understand lawyers who are trying to resolve the conflict only from the point of view of a lawyer, without assessing the situation as a whole, not believing that a legal victory in court will bring to a person. Maybe I take a lot of myself, but very often they go to lawyers for help in a difficult life situation and not always the legal resolution of the problem facilitates the situation. Sometimes even the opposite.

Another case. Divorce of spouses in one of the regions of the region. He is a large police boss, she is a physics teacher. I am for her. Section at home. Our requirements are to divide the house in kind into two equal parts. There is a construction opportunity. He is with a lawyer - against. Against only because against. Requires money. The process rolls in full swing, they insist on money and, suddenly, we understand that the satisfaction of their claim is beneficial to us. The amount of money is collected from us, she has a penny salary, and the house is completely it. But if we immediately agree with the claims, they will suspect something wrong and change them. The judge understood us, sits smiling. My main task is not to give out joy after the “defeat”. They won, jumped to the ceiling ... The first ten minutes. Then they understood. We went to appeal the decision that they were completely satisfied with all the requirements. The whole appeal, which was still a cassation, made.

Today, thank God, everything is fine with her. It seems to him too.

I am not always necessary to carry the ubiquitous lawyer with you, it is much more reasonable to try to agree. Or at least start with an attempt to agree.

And in the conflict that happened in the lyceum, the main victim is a schoolgirl. In the interests of which a meeting was appointed. One has only to go to the page of the ubiquitous underwear and, for some reason, I have the idea of ​​the greatness of a person. The man is great, as in his Chekhov greatness, just as he is so vile in the clubfoot depths of his baseness. For my long life, I have not met a more dirty person. How does he sell cakes? Where are the ecologists?

No one has the feeling that the child is killed? Where is our respected prosecutor's office? Or are you starting to work only in fact?

Finishing, I will also mention those who live in a social group, which can be entitled by their most common phrase: “Antohamic”. So, uninverted underhauls, I protect not cops, not bandits, not merchants and janitors, I protect the person. As a rule, an honest and worthy person. The rest is not to disturb.