Mirages in the ground

Like everyone else, I became the emotional victim of the Navalny-Sobchak conflict, which struck me not so much the ways that they had among themselves, how many storms around them. And they happened among themselves, by the way, the following. Navalny spoke out in a negative way about the visit of Ksenia to Bali, making a strange conclusion that a mirage (from the word “Mirage”) to the presidential candidate to go to Bali, and apparently, to hang out at factories and overnights, where normal Russians.

Oddly enough, but in this thought, Democrat Aleksey Anatolyevich completely solidarized with the fascist young man Maxim Leonardovich Shevchenko (for some reason still calling himself “left-handed”), who, although he made an amendment to the democratic right of Ksenia to go to all kinds of “Londans” and “ballets” when she wants to, “thanks, my own my own!”) The style of the house of tolerance is like a lady of easy behavior to dance on a pole, and to put signatures for their advance in panties.

Such a Mashcht approach to the political lady personally cried me and angered Ksenia Anatolyevna a lot, and she, somehow at the same time in the Echo of Moscow studio with the head of the campaign headquarters Alexei Navalny-Leonid Volkov, rushed to find out the relationship with the latter. What actually seems to me quite logical and interesting from the point of view of the credo, morally or immoral to the presidential candidate to have fun in the period from January to March 2018?

The clarification looked strange.

Having burst during someone else's broadcast (this is true!) In the studio, Ksenia said something excitedly, standing right in front of Volkov, and Volkov pretended that she was not, although she was clearly here, and not a ghost, and not transparent. And then Volkov decided that this was some kind of monstrous provocation in relation to him, the Naval and election campaign in general, to somehow harm “candidate No. 1 from the opposition” and prevent the president from becoming the president. (“And so he would, of course!”) And, I must say that in the Navalny support group, many also decided so. Despite the fact that all of them have not yet moved away from the initial attempt by Sobchak to the Polyana of Navalny by his own nomination.

In this context, the text of Sergei Parkhomenko is very indicative. He directly writes: “But by Navalny rivals and so - at least scoop up a bucket. Perhaps, more additional he is not very needed. ”

What can I say? Not needed - we believe! Provocation - yes! But not monstrous, since everyone remained with their own and even without bruises. Rather, this mentor intonation should be shocked by a normal person that everyone, according to Parkhomenko, should behave as a bulk should be. And I thought: after all, Navalny sees himself by the future president of a whole huge country and, under some kind of circumstances impressive, will establish a certain “new order”. True, he has no chance of establishing this “new order” right now, because his power was not allowed by the “presidential campaign of candidate No. 1 from the opposition” is designed for anything, but not to win the elections. Neither in 2018, nor in 2024, nor ever. But these chances will definitely appear if the structural crisis begins in Russia, and the state will collapse again. Then everything that Navalny today is obviously played tomorrow for its rapid elevation. As it happened with Boris Yeltsin in the 90s. And in this case, Navalny will remain, perhaps, almost the only one who will be able to intercept the authority and establish a “new order”. Therefore, in this perspective, from the future, everything that is being made against Navalny today seems to him and his supporters, if not a crime, then at least an annoying obstacle, on which a precious time has to be spent.

The problem is different: what is the real “new order” in this case? What do we know about him? If today Navalny and his headquarters believe that everyone owes him something and are the mute of the ordinary ordinary of his resistance front, what will become system-forming in his policy when he becomes the president?

The question is not accidental. The struggle with corruption declared by him and all these seemingly correct mantras about the development of the economy are all very cute, but this is unlikely to experience the drive. Yes, and there is little motive uniting the nation. However, it seems that Navalny does not think about this at all, believing that the struggle for the first place will be long, difficult, and the crisis that will certainly happen will put everything in its places. Then, in theory, Navalny simply will not ask Navalny what his “new order” should be. For what order the king will determine - this will be, and we will only have to pray so that Navalny turned out to be Godunov after Grozny and Gorbachev after Brezhnev.

Looking ahead, I note that a promise of the ideological construct of Navalny did not get a promise to sharply cancel the entire corps of the repressive laws of the current Duma and the proposal of the draft of a certain constitutional act, which establishes new rules for the personality and state relations. Because: what do we really need- this is a historical transition from the Horde statehood to the European one.

***

The main accusation against K. Sobchak is that she was specially slipped to us to ensure the appearance. And, perhaps, this is the Holy Truth. But it is not true, or rather, stupidity that in the “struggle in the stalls”, as Sergey Parkhomenko described it, because of this some meaning appeared. It was as if due to the fact that she was “slipped”, the reasons arose to us all to beat with pillows with fluff and coat each other with tar, while the sunbrushes are reassigned on the stage. With all due respect to the analytical and journalistic talents of Parkhomenko, as well as to his civil position, the conclusion: “That there is no more important opponent for Sobchak - than Navalny and his team. And for the sake of success in this rivalry, she is ready for great efforts and for serious reputational damage, ”hence does not follow.

Firstly, because with genuine democracy, to which we all seem to strive and which we see over the horizon of events, neither home blanks, nor political provocations, nor amazing self-nomination, nor a complete or partial disagreement with the leaders of good and light will be completely excluded. And, secondly, because the only thing that is important in our conditions is the publicity of the liberal-democratic opposition, and she does not interfere with the nomination of Sobchak and at all.

As, for example, the nomination of another “slipped” candidate - Pavel of the Bernum does not interfere. By the way, an instructive story happened to him. His carcass was thrown onto the left -Patriotic land, so that these unfortunate voters who were not lucky enough to participate in Antiputin Happing were not boring in polling stations. It turned out as in the legend of Caligula and his beloved horse incitute. With the only difference that the dictator Caligula really tried to push the horse into the Senate to annoy and humiliate the senators, and the current voters seem to voluntarily vote for any horse, they were so tired of our Caligula.

As for Grudinin, he, perhaps, is a good chairman of the collective farm, but in the context of politics, just like a horse, that is, does not have any talents. And not a speaker at all. He managed to answer the question of the reasons for his nomination to the presidency: “That's why a person is walking along the street, he sees that the old woman stumbled and fell and raises her. For what purpose? "

It is clear that this is just a nearby metaphor. The glory just wanted to explain that the unfortunate stumbled old woman is Russia under the control of Putin, and Grudinin, which means that he runs to raise her from the road until the truck moved.

It’s funny, but Grudinin, however, suddenly suddenly began to grow a rating, and those who “slipped it” had a task, arose a little to put him back.

They put information about the publication of foreign accounts of the “People’s Candidate”. In fact, these are the same Bali Ksenia Sobchak. Grudin ran to make excuses : it turns out that a tragedy had recently occurred in his family, and he opened accounts to help (save) a relative, paying for treatment abroad. And now, they say, I thought better of it, as expected, closed.

It’s scary to think that it will now become a sick relative, but in this plot “People’s Candidate” still appears to be a fairly human person. Undoubtedly, Grudinin perfectly understands that effective treatment is only abroad, and the current Russian legislation works against people and their interests. He also understands the fact that a Russian must have all financial, medical and migration rights, like any other Western European. To be treated - where they really treat, open any accounts and visit any ball.

So Grudinin thinks to himself. But he will never say that and this will never be in his program.



Photo: 1. Russia. Moscow. June 24, 2015. Oppositionist Alexei Navalny and TV presenter Ksenia Sobchak on the Rain television channel live. Sergey Fadeichev/TASS
2. Russia. Saint Petersburg. January 19, 2018, candidate for the president of Russia from the Communist Party of the Communist Party Pavel Grudinin at a meeting with voters in the Coliseum Arena concert hall. Svetlana Kholyavchuk/Interpress/TASS