The end of the case

The Tver District Court of Moscow returned the case of an administrative offense to the police, instituted against the politician of Alexei Navalny after his detention on the "voter strike" on January 28. This was reported by the politician himself. Due to the blocking of the Navalny.com website, a copy of the message is published on its mirror available in Russia without anonymizers.

The court made such a decision in connection with the incorrect drawing up of the protocol under part 8 of Article 20.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (repeated violation at rallies), as well as the absence of material evidence in the case file - seized from Navalny's phone and SIM card.

"The Tver court is generally known that it accepts any police pussy without looking at the law. But here they even returned the case, writing" the seized phone and the SIM card seized in the case, we can’t accept. "That is, the court established the fact that my beautiful iPhone 7 was simply stolen somewhere. I suppose that some chamaned rites were being taken with him now. With a tambourine, in order to be nourished by force and someday still pronounce my last name, ”Navalny writes.

In this regard, Navalny filed an application for theft of the phone in the TFR. “There are no documents, there is no protocol, there is no court, there is no phone in the materials. What is it? Well, they put the phone really,” the politician noted.

On January 28, Navalny was detained on Tverskaya about 3 minutes after appearing in the rally. One of the opposition who accompanied the politician - Konstantin Saltykov from the "protest Moscow" - tried to interfere with the security forces, and he was seized with Navalny. After the detention, Saltykov was beaten.

Navalny was freed from OP "Yakimanka" late in the evening, without familiarizing themselves with the protocol.

Meanwhile, in relation to Saltykov , the Investigative Committee immediately began a pre -investigation verification for the factory of the case under Article 318 of the Criminal Code (the application of violence to a representative of the authorities). In addition, the protocols under part 8 of Article 20.2 and part 1 of Article 19.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses (disobedience to the legal requirement of the policeman) were falsified on the activist. Based on these protocols, he was detained in the department before the court. On January 29, the judge of the Tver District Court of Moscow Alexei Stekliev arrested Saltykov for 30 days .

On January 31, Navalny published a post on Facebook “Why I wasn’t arrested”, which suggested that his administrative case would be examined closer to the presidential election. “If I put me on January 28, I will be released on February 28. And Putin wants me to be isolated immediately before the elections, and preferably during the elections. Therefore, I assume that they will put me in such a way that I would spend on March 18 in the cell,” Navalny wrote. “So do not worry, arrest. The main thing is that we continue to work despite this.”

On February 5, Navalny was interviewed in the TFR as part of a pre -investigation verification for the presence of Article 318 in his actions on January 28. There the policy demonstrated the “victim” policeman. "During the detention, Navalny hit his left foot on my right leg in the knee area, causing severe physical pain," the denunciation says. The policeman was sent to a forensic examination.

A video of Navalny’s detention, made by “faces”, was attached to the case file. The politician himself distributed this entry in his accounts on social networks.

Shooting Grani.ru: