Service to the king

The first was, as expected, Dmitry Peskov. Then Oliver Stone - more precisely, the workers of the first guestelekanal. And now, here, the metropolitan mayor posted on his website under the name "Why will I vote for Vladimir Putin?"

Peskov, rattling along the strings of a cheerful press-secretary lyre, articeman artistelessly praised his master: they say, and Vox Populi glorifies him, and the gods equal to him incomparable are unlikely to find him on Olympus. In short, carried a blizzard . For which he was publicly condemned by the chairman of the CEC and apologized.

With the film of the best of our Hollywood friends, the story was not so sad, but also unpleasant. Having heard about the re-demonstration of Putin on the eve of the elections, Ella Pamfilova did not seem to see in it the "presence of a campaign goal", but still very advised Ernst "to postpone the further display" of the documentary until better times. When the people will finally vote for Vladimir Vladimirovich. Ernst heeded good advice.

And yesterday’s performance by Sobyanin overshadowed everything that we still saw and heard, tracking the election plots. Asking a question, which was practically not interested in anyone, Sergei Semenovich undertook to answer him for a long time, in detail, mournfully. It was opened that for two decades connecting the blogger-gear and Putin by personal acquaintance, he was not “bronze”, but became everything “more natural, more simple in communication”. The mayor also suggested recalling that the Russians were discussing when the coming national leader only went to power - from the Caucasian war and explosions of houses to non -payment of beggars - and what they are discussing now. And then they discuss that, "contrary to the fall of oil prices and sanctions, Russia has survived and moves forward."

With all the severity, the speaker spoke about the disagreements: some, you see, "want to make us Americans, others - Chinese." With all convincing - why on March 18 we need to come and vote for Putin. For his true, but lazy adherents who remained on this day at home, “will be written in the strikers and add that you doubt the Russian status of Crimea,” and what could be worse than such doubts? Unless the suspicions that you support one famous, but by the name of an inconsistent politician, which just calls for a strike. Well, of course, “many Western experts and the media are preparing to politicize the turnout,” and “everyone who does not come to the polls will try to present as voting“ against. ”Personally, Sergei Semenovich refuses to be a puppet in this vile game and therefore he will“ go to the polls and will vote for Putin. ”What, as they say, wishes to you.

What can you say? There is a direct violation of the law prohibiting persons holding government posts to influence the electorate in order to help him vote as the authorities want. What, unsuccessfully trying to restrain himself, Sobyanin was already announced by a member of the Sirotkin CEC, and not without humor. On the one hand, he condemned the “non -ethical act” of the mayor, on the other hand, he thought out loud about whether the agitation for Putin was agitation as such. The critic of Sobyanin suggested that if it was “just a recognition of love to the president”, then maybe nothing, the law on elections does not forbid the commander in chief. However, a murderous mockery was partly visible to this speech, which in our times is not quite typical of officials overseeing the Puticolist propagandists.

In general, the scandal came out to that loud that the problem of ethics receded to the background before conspiracyology. It was even the impression that all of them, to one degree or another, sought to harm the favorite of the current presidential race - both the press secretary, and television people, and the mayor. They, they say, are also tired of the irremovable Putin - and they will be fearlessly drowned. Since for neglect of the law on elections by the faithful of its associates, both the violators can punish and the favorite himself. Is it a joke, law! It seems, you know, a certain intra -elite conspiracy against the one without which Russia will not die, but will save.

Although, of course, there are other explanations, simpler. Burely enthusiastic idiocy, for example. The calculating desire to get to be leaning, which is most of all related to the Moscow authorities: after all, in the capital, according to tradition, both protest voting and an active boycott under the control of Navalny and Western intelligence should be expected. That is, Sobyanin, who, moreover, has to be re -elected quite soon, lay straws in advance in advance to repenture on March 19 sincerely and declare: he did what he could, not even afraid of Pampilova, but I had such a heavy city and the cruel inhabitants in it. No matter how much they can be agitated for who Russia survived, dream of some other president. Not everything, of course, but in comparison with other cities and villages, alas, many.

Finally, it is possible that this time it is in Moscow that large -scale falsifications are being prepared - with subsequent protests and a new swamp business according to the old, tested model, and this version seems the most realistic. This cannot be afraid, knowing Putin and his views on how victory should look under motto like "die near Moscow." And the laconic usually Sergey Semenovich in this play will then be entrusted with the role with the words "I called them, and they obeyed me." Actually, this is also a conspiracy, but the conspiracyology in it does not smell. Because a conspiracy against fellow citizens, in other words, the usurpation of power is a too ordinary thing, especially in authoritarian countries, in order to sin on conspiracyology.