Jewish diplomacy

The foreign policy of the nuclear power is controlled from the anonymous channel in the messenger

Against the backdrop of a diplomatic conflict with Great Britain, due to the attempt to kill Skripal, an anonymous telegram channel spread the fake statement of the British Prime Minister Teresa May that Minister Sergei Lavrov is not worthy of his post. The phrase attributed to May was then quoted by the RT channel, and the representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova entered with pseudo-mei and sharply criticized her. Thanks to the Internet users, the deception was opened.

The authors of an anonymous telegram channel then pleaded guilty and apologized. The apology was quoted by the editor -in -chief of RT Margarita Simonyan.

“The boy was not crucified, but they could,” commentators on social networks are ironic on this subject. That is, the rhetoric as a whole is quite recognizable. The low level of awareness of employees of the Russian diplomatic department is no secret, and the same Maria Zakharova regularly suffers from the lack of facts. So when, for example, the Russian authorities in the course of the current diplomatic conflict prohibit the work in our country of the charity British Council (for the second time in recent years), it is difficult to answer with confidence about whether these actions are based on a sober political calculation or on fakes and a “general atmosphere”, as it is seen taking into account “analytics in telegram”.

If everything is clear with Russian speakers, then real, not fake statements by their British colleagues may amaze. In the current situation, it seems that you can expect only stiff arrogance from the diplomats of Great Britain, but in practice everything is different. The head of the British Foreign Ministry Boris Johnson made a sensational speech that "the order to kill Skripal gave, most likely, Putin personally." The diplomatic meaning of this demarche-provided that in London they intend to go to resolve the conflict-is unlikely to undertake someone to explain, and in the entire structure the reservation is most amazed. In other words, Johnson also does not have facts, but the statements must be made. Everything looks like if, realizing the toxicity of Maria Zakharova, they decided to choose an alter ego in British politics and knock out a wedge with a wedge.

The number of fakes is growing, and both sides of the Russian-British conflict demonstrate a stable inability to cooperate with each other. You can potentially engage in escalation as much as you like. There are rumors that the British are preparing to disperse Londgrad, boycott the World Cup, and the Russian authorities are preparing “asymmetric answers” ​​as usual, and so on. The status of the newcomer “Novice”, which, as expected in the world of post -truths, does not have this diplomatic bacchanalia, according to Russia, Russia does not have.

If you leave aside the personal foreign policy heroism of the listed speakers, it seems that everyone is eventually interested in the conflict is resolved by the world. For this, apparently, there is one way: the parties must begin to cooperate in the case of attempted murder of Skripal. The Russian authorities did not like the British ultimatum on the provision of a dossier about the "newcomer", but no one likes mysterious murders in their own country. So let's imagine a second chance: Russia opens data on chemical weapons, Great Britain allows Russian investigators to the Skripal case. After that, the dispute goes on the merits, and not about how to more effectively wound each other.