D. Peskov told us about the symbiosis of the two Putins. In principle, the splitting of the first person, if it is too large-scale and diverse for one physical medium, is not a new phenomenon, fully mastered by world culture from the Holy Scriptures to the book of the Strugatsky brothers “Monday begins on Saturday.” But this case, of course, is closer to the Book of Books.
“The Gospel of Peskov” testifies that, in addition to the Putin we know and have rallied around, there is a Putin who understands what we need in the future.
That is, we are offered a dogma about the dual essence of Putin. Putin is the Creator of all things, or Putin the Father, and Putin, to whom we owe our future, or Putin the Son. The earthly fate of the Son, as we know, may be associated with certain troubles, but D. Peskov omits this.
It would be logical, of course, for the picture to be completed by a third Putin, namely Putin the Holy Spirit, who binds together the first two Putins. And then we get Putin’s trinity. Or the classic Trinity.
I would recommend stopping at three Putins, since its further proliferation is no longer justified and not only risks leaving the canonical space, but, simply put, it will surpass Charlie Hebdo magazine.
However, I am afraid that it is already difficult to stop.