Who is called

Political plots also sometimes rhyme - just like in a movie. Or in an intricate book, where the actions and speeches of the hero are successfully looped by a cunning author. Another connoisseur is even able to find in them, in these political plots, something aesthetically very exciting. Let's try and we will try.

About four and a half years ago, the Kremlin spokesman, speaking at the Kommersant Academy of Journalism, inadvertently issued a GOSTain. Peskov was asked why his chef avoids saying aloud the word "Navalny", and Dmitry Sergeyevich explained. “Putin in this country,” said Peskov, “is in politically out of competition, if he pronounces Navalny’s name, he will give him part of his popularity.”

GOSTINA in Live flowed to the newspaper, and its most famous reporter, personal biographer Vladimir Vladimirovich and part -time president of the academy, as if shocked by the betrayal of colleagues (before the lecture, it was announced that the revelations of the speaker were not intended for printing) fired two editors from Kommersant. The terrible scandal came out at all - both for the reputation of the biographer, and in the sense that the local news from the field of magical practices in the Kremlin gained a worldwide scale. About Putin and Navalny, the inhabitants of Planet Earth learned the most important thing.

Four and a half years later, the story repeated, creatively enriched. This time, the students of the Higher School of Economics listened to Peskov, and he again, suggesting that the conversation was conducted by Off the Record, let himself with a different exclusive . In particular, about Navalny. Nothing noticeably over the past time, the spokeswoman not only uttered the forbidden name aloud and added that "there is nothing terrible in this." Burning violently, he also turned the leader of the Russian Front, whom he accused of egoism and inability to compromise, not without reason. And finally, he even eared that the named finally by name brings a split into the ranks of the opponents of the regime: after all, "without an opposition - without a real opposition - the country cannot live." To hear this from the lips of a spokeswoman, whose chief for two decades in a row is busy with the destruction of disagreements - this, you know, was worth a lot.

I also remembered how Dmitry Sergeyevich praised Vladimir Vladimirovich for the “pragmatism” and for the fact that “he is very far from populism,” due to the fact that the president refused to go out to people in Kemerovo. However, it was an inevitable rhyme, the eternal refrain of all the statements of the spokesman, assuring us that his patron does not need any spokeswoman-he is so great and resourceful. True, it remained not quite understandable why it was impossible to just appear before the protesters and tell them several human words.

Probably, Maxim Shevchenko knows the answer to this question, who successfully complemented the performance of Peskov on the air of a popular radio station. “The first -person’s security in the framework of this event can not be ensured,” a member of the HRC said with his inherent wisdom, “and if at least one provocation was ... then the guard would have opened fire ...” I didn’t go deep into the topic of sand, and this fact should be recorded, noting that Putin still has a good speaker. Also smart, but in moderation.

Well, the loudest was his comments on the case of a deputy of Slutsky. With that unlimited sincerity they sounded, which had already been written about. Moreover, if a week ago, four times asked by journalists about a loving international, Peskov irritably sent them all to the Ethics Commission of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, now he has overshadowed the entire commission.

Firstly, he was happy to repeat the main thesis of those who denounced the victims of the parliamentary harassment. "If he squeezed you, if he harassed you, what was you silent? Why didn’t you go to the police? Why did you have so much time - and you go to the ethics commission?" - the man had fun, and even a reminder that he himself has two daughters did not bow him to empathy.

Secondly, taking a feasible part in the war with the State Department, he severely condemned those who wanted to "keep up with the bacchanalia that is happening in America." Both Russian girls condemned, and Hollywood stars, who, you see, "became stars ... earned hundreds of millions of dollars and ten years later they say that Weinstein is to blame." And "what is the name of a woman who slept with a man for 10 million dollars? - the spokesman did not let up.“ It is called a prostitute. ” Rodnina did not rise to such heights, along with the lady, whom no one "mugged" from birth. Here he, having envied women raped by the producer, reached some sky-high peaks.

That's how they are all looped, these amazing plots. However, in order to appreciate them, a real expert should watch this movie without ceasing. Constantly read this book of Russian political destinies. It is vigilant to track this circus with horses. What are the people who are immersed in the current Russian life, otherwise observers, and if you decide that they are too passionate about their aesthetic experiences, you will be mistaken. For their daily impressions of this life are joyless, and the bread of their sides, and what aesthetics is already there.

However, for something, they are also needed, such observations and such texts dedicated to our rulers and their service service, for that, perhaps all of us to better understand what is happening in our native country. And it is necessary to understand that, no longer surprised and predicting a lot, to reflect on the present and future of Russia, which is reflected and sunk in the speeches of Newsmakers.