Dark times

This is the name of a quite mediocre film with the beautiful Gary Oldman in the role of Churchill. But I'm not talking about cinema, I'm talking about life

Winston Churchill, British state and politician, Prime Minister of Great Britain
In 1940-1945 and 1951-1955, photo: Pixabay / mikesphotos

Several dozens of spectators in the dark hall sincerely emphasized Churchill - and despised his disgusting opponents from the "party of the world with Hitler" ...

And I suddenly thought: it is interesting, but how many here they know that in the described period of time (May 1940) the Soviet Union was an ally of Hitler?

I'm afraid to offend comrades in viewing, but it is possible that, counting with me, there were two of us in the hall (I came to the cinema with my wife). The rest of those present Molotov was known, most likely, by the name of the cocktail, without a ribbentrop through a dash.

It should be noted that vile Chamberlain in May 1940 proposed to enter into negotiations with Hitler in order to save the British army surrounded by Dunkirka. Our heroic “grandfathers fought” at that time not against Hitler, but in complete coordination with him, as part of the NKVD special operations to deport the indigenous population of the Baltic countries and the cleansing of Western Ukraine and Poland. Rovnekhonko on the dates in which the film takes place, Katyn was on, about which the eaters of our ideological pop Korn, as there were no ideas, did not have.

Churchill's thought that the aggressive insignificance, who imagines himself the master of the world, should be given the most decisive rebuff, today is relevant again

Dark times, truly dark.

And when the light is lit in the hall, it only becomes more visible.

One hundred and fifty Pushkov and Medinsky will not cancel stories, but they successfully falsified it, again making millions of people hostages of ignorance, and their future - vague time, fraught with a big trouble, because there was still no case that the foul nation did not pay the full price for this.

Churchill’s thought that the aggressive insignificance, who imagines himself the master of the world, should be given the most decisive rebuff, today is relevant again - both for England, and not only for her.

* The author’s opinion may not coincide with the opinion of the editorial office