
Responses on a fresh bill , introduced into the Duma and then creatively mastered by the deputy Tolstoy, are monotonous for the most part. These are critical reviews in which normative standard analytics is sometimes enriched with simple and complex obscenity constructions. There are also banal rhetorical questions such as “betrayal or madhouse?”, To which there is no answer. About four years already at least.
Yes, and how it seems to respond differently if the speaker Volodin and the leaders of all Duma factions introduced a bill to their lower ward, within the framework of which American investments, American computers and American medicines intend to prohibit. At the same time, encouraging total robbery. And the specified Tolstoy, when the Old Liberal Nadezhdin informed him that the middle -aged Russian citizens, due to diseases, should take foreign medicines, advised compatriots to spit out western tablets and be treated with a decoction of hawthorn and oak bark. All these blows under the breath of the collective lord Kerzon, including blocking the Telegram messenger, caused a painful reaction in Russian society, and here are responses.
With the inevitable meme about the bombing of Voronezh, which individual observers are now metaphorically compared with Damascus after the bombing. Noting that the ill -fated Voronezh today looks much worse than the capital of fraternal Syria. And if the lawmakers do not disappear, then this symbolic Voronezh will have little left.
Meanwhile, all these comments and comments could be more substantial and less insulting to the best people of the country, when they took into account the originality of the current moment. If we were illuminated by the hunch that they would not be able to speak and act in a different way. And only as Volodin with the leaders subordinate to him and deputy Tolstoy. In an effort to legislatively draw up a ban or theft of enemy technologies. Falling to the origins, that is, to hawthorn and oak bark - the best drugs from any disease.
Well, judge for yourself.
After the return of Crimea to his native harbor and the first, timid, until the sanctions that flew in response, what should they do, President Putin and his accomplices? Not to give what it was poorly lying, but now it is tidied to the hands and lies well, shifted into a spacious pocket. And after the Donbass and the aimedly accurate shooting at the passenger Boeing, when the sanctions began to be called "sectoral", what to do? To confess, or something, what they have done, apologize, pay compensation and leave where the Russian spring was blazing with an extensive forest fire arranged by the arsonists. Or even earlier, when they were tortured in a prison of Sergei Magnitsky and a law was adopted in the West, named after the deceased. Do not punish those who swept to the death of a Russian citizen. Or now, when the sanctions became everyday phenomenon - how could the authorities answer them?
Reflecting seriously, without anger, addiction and dentisting about all these events, one cannot but see a deep inner logic in them. The inevitability of counter -sanctions, and precisely in the form in which they were invented and almost unanimously accepted, amazing the audience. The truth of the image, if you like.
Attributors, on top to bottom, to the death of Magnitsky could hardly respond to the law of his name somehow differently than a refusal to adopt Russian orphans. One adult was in courage - now we will take up the children. Those who occupied the Crimea and Donbass had no choice but to put pressure on European values in the form of vegetables and fruits with bulldozers. With our other Assad and its family tendency to poison the population with deadly chemistry the same picture. Do not leave a friend in trouble. You have to deal with it from the high of the UN rostrum, and lay the Voronezh bombing on the table as an asymmetric counterargument.
Let the orphans are dying, feed the potatoes to the bulldozer, we will be treated in spite of the state department of the birch bark under the wings, and we are stingy with everything else. We stole the native peninsula - we will steal someone else's property. In full accordance with the law, for which people's chosen ones are going to vote in an atmosphere of universal glee.
That is, they would have responded harder, but the trouble is: Americans and Europeans, storing loot in our banks, are unfortunate. And they do not build palaces in Russia, and are not interested in the local Latifundia. You can also, of course, start a world war with them, but here the red line is running around: Vladimir Vladimirovich, along with his generals and deputies, is not ready to get into it. For the good reason that they all want to live. However, the problem is already being discussed, and when the commander in chief, looking at the globe in nightmares, does not find Russia there, he is in a bad mood in the morning. And his gloomy visions openly shares in the world.
In short, everything that exists is reasonably or at worst is explained. Including our laws and bills that are well described by a saying about a bird that has a claw is bogged down. And the bird is sorry, and therefore I want to comprehend it when this misfortune happened to her, and there are different versions. It is clear that the claw finally got some year ago in the Crimea. However, the old people still remember the Georgian war, and the Munich speech, and the Chechen massacre, and the most memorable is the early fall of 1999. The time when Voronezh has not yet been turned into a landfill, and only Moscow, Buinaksk, Volgodonsk were blown up. It is difficult to say who is right and whether to believe the vindictive old people.