Poor quality sign

Do everyone know that you need to handle the poisons carefully? So, for example, transfusing dangerous chemicals from empty to empty, it is necessary to monitor the purity of the experiment and so that no drop spills. Here we need firmness and accuracy, especially in cases where this muck sags with great policy.

Two cases from practice demonstrating two methods of handling poison: correct and vicious.

Here Salisbury, where two Russian citizens became a victim of a nervous "novice". There, in this old town, there are now a lot of police: a cordon at the house where the former GRU Colonel lived, and at the restaurant, where he had fallen with his daughter, and near the park in which they were found. People in civilian clothes continue to explore the terrain - why?

The version that the British conduct an inquiry and at the same time strive to disinfect the buried area sounds convincing, but it is ordered to reject it. The interests of great politics dictate a different, much more correct answer that the Russian Embassy in London is already announced and is already announced . This is said by diplomats who have traveled in such matters, an attempt to cover traces, since "stripping will destroy evidence of a staged nature of provocation against Russia." Such, as it were, the poisonous answer immediately transforms reality, and we begin to see the hidden springs of the attack in Salisbury. Amazed at the insidiousness of the British authorities and their accomplices in the police and special services. They almost killed people, and now they notice traces, monsters!

And here is the Duma, which is in Syria. There, according to the Russian president, in early April, a staging of the use of poisonous substances against the civilian population was also used, after which the Americans with the allies bombed Damascus. And in order to confirm this undoubtedly confirm, Russian journalists tried very much.

We saw how the enemies of Putin and Assad, falsifiers from volunteer "white helmets", are being fanbled by the shooting of the victims of the chemical alleged attack of the Syrian troops on civilians, including children. As a brave Russian correspondent, in some unexpectedly cozy place, talks with 11-year-old Hassan Diab-thereby a boy who seemed to suffer from Zarin. And a fearless journalist meets with doctors, in the very hospital where people were saved. No, doctors say, they did not find any signs of chemical poisoning in patients. And doctors will not lie, right?

Alas, with these poisoned news, our journalists, unlike diplomats, turned incorrectly. On which they burned. Their mistake was that the guys acted in another setting. It was still much easier to the embassy: they dealt with abstractions, telling about some sobs of invisible traces and mysterious stripping. Go prove that English policemen are not participating in the destruction of evidence. With the "white helmets", the boy, as well as the Syrian landscapes, turned out to be worse, because these were people and landscapes are quite specific. Names, turnouts, personnel - everything was checked.

Andit turned out , in particular, for fake news about the staging of a chemical attack, Channel One and Russia-1 issued personnel from the filming of the agitation of the Prosadov feature film "Man-Revolution". And in another revealing plot, Russian television and propagandists used scenes from short plays shot by the Syrian director Humam Husari. As for the boy, the military university of Russia-24 Evgeny Poddubny talked with him and his father not only in the hospital, but also in the courtyard of the house of officers in Damascus, where Russian fighters come to their home. And we can only guess what we advised them, the child and dad, as well as the doctors from the Duma hospital to tell the reporter the warriors -liberators - local and inhabitants. Although we may not guess.

What to guess at all about anything is why, within two weeks, the Russian and Syrian authorities did not allow OPCHO experts - an organization that ensures monitoring compliance with the ban on the use of chemical weapons. There, perhaps, traces really swept and evidence was destroyed. And if we are destined to survive before the court, in which the Syrian authorities and its patrons in Moscow and Tehran will be accused of crimes against humanity, then this episode will become a powerful indirect evidence of guilt. There are probably straight lines.

As in the case of the poisoning of Sergei and Julia Skripyle in Salisbury, in which there are many problems before the investigation, but the one that prevents the world community from dealing with Assad is not in sight. No one represents interference with Scotland Yard and other services to study the circumstances of the poisoning of Russian citizens.

However, preliminary results can be summed up now. Few people in the world today believe in the information that Russian officialdom spreads, whether President Putin, the embassy in London or special journalists in Moscow and in Damascus. For the information emanating from them is too toxic. Regardless of whether they are amenable to immediate verification or, in principle, no test is amenable. It used to be, in timeless perestroika times, Russian -speaking leaders trusted, checking. Now, tired of meaningless inspections with monotonous results, they have settled completely.