An honorary three times disabled

The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg received three houses from the State Daching Fund - those that were previously granted for little money to disabled people and poor

From the Soviet era, the city got hundreds of unpaved houses located in the resort area. In Solnechnoy and Komarovo, in the most prestigious places, not far from the Gulf of Finland, several families from those who cannot afford to take a full -fledged cottage set them in them all year round.

Not a simple tenant

And here are three houses with an adjacent plot along Nagornaya Street in the village of Solnechnaya, in which socially vulnerable categories were previously removed, recently surrounded a construction fence. The following picture was opened by the photographer of “Novaya”: a simple belt from the Halup was carried out and dumped into a heap on the ground, part of the trees is drilled, the plot is chopped in places. It looks like a serious reorganization awaits the site. According to the law, this, it would seem, is impossible: according to the lease of social cottages, the tenant does not have the right to change anything on the site.

But it turned out that this is not a simple tenant. According to the extract from the USRN, all three country houses are rented by one citizen named Vyacheslav Serafimovich Makarov. The extract did not say what position he occupies, but there are not many people in St. Petersburg at a time in the resort region with such a combination of the name, surname and patronymic, and even capable of getting three houses at a time. One of them is the chairman of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg. Judging by the USRN, the full namesake of the speaker entered into a lease agreement for all cottages almost simultaneously: at home 5 and 7 according to Nagornaya-in November 2015, with the end of the lease term in 2025, to house 3 in September 2016, with the end, respectively, in 2026.

Indeed, according to the law, social cottages are leased for ten years. One thing is unclear: why did the premises for three families get one? And also to what preferential category of citizens from the list of city law “On state summer cottage service of citizens of preferential categories” No. 170-14 does the Speaker of the Zaksa belong? He is a lonely mother with children under 16 and income below the subsistence minimum, or he is a large father, a lonely disabled childhood disabled, a former prisoner of a fascist concentration camp, a disabled unit, a disabled person or a liquidator of an accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant?

The cost of a preferential agreement in 2018 is from 60 to 90 thousand rubles per year. The Committee on Social Policy annually determines which part of the rent will contribute to the beneficiary, and which is the city budget. In 2018, this coefficient is 55.5%. The cost of a commercial lease also varies, only the amplitude there is several times more - from 120 thousand to 1 million 200 thousand rubles a year.

By the way, no matter what category he belongs to, to receive the right to a social cottage, a citizen should at least not have another cottage. Not only did the last agreement concluded with the already two rented houses, but, according to the new, the speaker uses another state of state of Nearby - the one where Valentina Ivanovna Matvienko used to be the President’s envoy. The address is Sunny, Leningradskaya Street, 1. But this is a completely different Gosdach genre - elite. This object is not included in the State Daching Fund for the Poor, regulated by law 170-14, but it is a state department.

The prosecutor's office was not counting

In 2015, the prosecutor's office checked the St. Petersburg GUPDO “Primurodnoye”, responsible for servicing the country fund. The supervisory authority did not satisfy the results of the program for 2015-2016: the cottages were distributed according to an opaque and incomprehensible scheme, many beneficiaries could not get them. According to the Law of St. Petersburg “On State Daching Service of Citizens of Preferential Categories”, at least 50% of the fund should be populated by beneficiaries, and the remaining places (but not more than 50%) can be distributed at commercial prices. The law also states that the disposal of the fund objects is otherwise prohibited.

The prosecutor's office said that the "suburban" in 2015-2016. At contractual prices, 914 separate cottages were distributed, and only four beneficiaries got it: this indicates a “irrational disposal of the fund objects and violation of the rights of preferential categories of citizens”. The release that the prosecutor’s office distributed was a list of cases of refusal to provide preferential dachas to blockades and disabled people of groups I and II.

As a result, the prosecutor's office made an idea to the Governor of the city, and the Office for the Development of Horticulture and Gardens (to which the suburban "subordinate) has already conducted its audit. In the act signed by the head of the commission created for this commission, the fact that yes, "the specified ratio ( 50 to 50. - ed. ) Was not survived." Whether there were three houses among the 914 “contractual” dachas at Nagornaya, the Office of the “New” was not reported, but judging by the dates, there were.

For three years, officials came to their senses after the invasion of prosecutors and in 2018 at the request of “Novaya” replied that everything was not entirely true - the prosecutor’s office simply incorrectly interpreted the data.

Andrei Lyakh, the head of the department of gardening and gardening, assured the “new” that no one violated the law - it refers to the summer cottages, and not about individual objects of the country fund, and the ratio of 50 by 50 refers to the premises. That is, it is necessary to count the rooms, not the building. Alexander Rzhanenkov, the head of the Committee on Social Policy, said that 1747 premises for 1613 preferential tenants were included in the address, that is, the preferential program of 2015. Almost all rooms, with the exception of four separate cottages mentioned by the prosecutor’s office, are located in communal houses in several rooms, where several families are populated. How many houses were given in reality under 1747 preferential premises, the committee does not know: “The committee does not have information about the number of country houses provided to citizens.” Therefore, it remains unclear how the prosecutor’s office turned out to be the ratio of commercial and preferential dachas by 2%, and officials have 50 by 50%.

Seven nannies have a program without eye

The formal lessor of Makarov on Nagornaya Street is the “suburban”, and above it stands the aforementioned management, where we sent the relevant issues. As follows from the response of the head of the department Andrei Lyakh, the three cottages on Nagornaya are no longer social. Moreover, they turn it off from the list of preferential objects not by virtue of a normative act, but, on the contrary, they can be included there by a normative act. And by default - turned off. This regulatory act is an address program that is accepted for the next two years. According to Andrei Vyacheslavovich, the houses that interest us in the preferential program for 2018-2019 are not included. What is logical: after all, then they were already leased by Makarov. Apparently, they were not included in the previous program for 2016-2017, since the number of preferential dachas in the GUPDO from 2016 to 2019 remains unchanged - 1834 premises.

The question arises, who decides on the composition of the targeted program, who decides, which cottages to be given to the poor next year and which are quite property to their own citizens. According to the ex-deputy of the Zaks and one of the authors of the "state" law of Natalia Evdokimova, the decision to update the register of objects of the State Dawn Fund (what to include-what to throw out) is taken jointly by the Committee of Property Relations (Kio) and the Committee on Social Policy (KSP). The preferential part of the list is directly in the PCP. The prerogative of the Kio remains work with the remaining part of the registry: it concludes lease agreements with “property” tenants. Thus, according to Evdokimova, the decision on the transfer of State Damn Makarov could only be made in Kio. Unfortunately, we did not receive a response from this committee within the deadline established by law.

The KSP argues that most decisions on the country fund are making a “suburban”. It itself decides how much and which rooms to give the beneficiaries, it also provides the premises with wealthy summer residents. The competence of the KSP includes only the compilation of the attached list of lucky ones. And how many preferential summer residents will be in 2018, the Committee on Social Policy does not yet know: “suburban” should send this information to the KSP until July 10.

In the load

It is important to note that the law prohibits the ransom of the Gosdach fund as tenants, but it is only about houses. The adjacent areas are owned by the city, but they do not belong to the State Dachand. Therefore, the ban on privatization does not apply to them.

The head of the department also reports that the land plot of the cottages in Nagornaya, 3, 5 and 7, with an area of ​​28 acres is leased by the GUPDO “Prigorodnoye”. So, Makarov is still transferred only at home. When asked who is the customer of the work of the Makarovsky cottages, Lyakh, citing the tenant’s duty to “improve the condition of the property provided”, said that the work is underway at the expense of the tenant. That is, Gupdo himself. But this means the use of budget funds. Based on the Law No. 170-14, the rents of the Nelgotniks are not enough for the maintenance of the State Dawn Fund and the difference is compensated from the budget. It turns out that the city handed over three social summer cottages to a non -poor tenant and immediately took up the “improvement” of his lawns at his own expense.

What will happen to the Makarovsky dachas further? It is doubtful that the speaker will want to live in 1967 prefabricated houses, which are the objects at the Nagorny. He has two options. The first - the city can demolish the old state docks if they are in disrepair. It is possible that the houses will be demolished, and in their place they will erect a new, large and beautiful mansion. The question is at whose expense it will be done. Makarov himself is not entitled to demolish state doctors. This means that only the city can be the customer of work again and only at the budget account.

Another option is more likely: the houses will simply be excluded from the register of the State Dawn Fund, and the land plot is put up for auction.

And this will not be any know-how of the speaker: in a quarter of a century, the State Country Fund is already very stripped.

For example, in 2010, about 400 buildings were seized from the “suburbs” and sold at prices ridiculous for this area: so, three buildings (278 sq. M) on a plot of 27 acres left for 6.55 million. Naturally, none of the new owners were needed with dubious convenience, and they were all demolished.

In this case, Makarov himself can be the only possible buyer, since the site will be sold with an excessive encumbrance in his person as a tenant. Who wants to buy a site with a speaker in a load? However, according to Andrei Lyakh, "information about the publication by the authorities of legal acts on the sale of these objects is absent."

We add that in the official declaration of income of the speaker of Makarov, an indication that objects are located on Nagornaya Street and are not related to the country fund. Last year, the State Duma allowed the FSO to secrete information about real estate of officials using the state guard for their consideration of their safety. At the disposal of “New” there is a declaration of citizen V. Makarov, let's call it for internal use, where all three houses are also present, but indicating the address.

"New Gazeta in St. Petersburg"