The exposure of Sentsov or the failure of the FSB?

Why there is no reason to believe the version of the "organizer of the terrorist attack"

In Kyiv, at the OSCE conference, a man in camouflage came to the microphone and admitted that it was he who delivered to the Crimea and personally handed over the explosives to Oleg Sentsov.

The man explained that he spoke about his role in the preparation of terrorist attacks in the Crimea, so that the SBU found out who exactly “surrendered” Sentsov Russian counterintelligence.

In addition, according to the witness, Sentsov was not the only resident of Crimea who received explosives from him.

Ukrainian journalists identified in the speaker of a citizen of Ukraine Sergey Sterikov, who was registered on Facebook under the pseudonym Ivan Sirko.

But if we assume that Sirikov Sirikov really handed over the explosives to Sentsov, we can talk about the failure of the FSB operational work.

The fact is that from the reports from the trial of Oleg Sentsov, it is reliably known that he was found either explosives or weapons. The verdict against Sentsov was built on the basis of the testimony of his "accomplices."

In the criminal case, “two objects imitating the IEV” that were hidden under the bridge were really featured. When trying to pick up these dummies, Alexei Chirniy was detained.

And the CHIMIK student Alexander Pirogov, who, at the request of Chirniya, was supposed to make homemade explosive devices (IEDs) to undermine the monument to Lenin and Eternal Flame in Simferopol, was made to the cache.

Pirogov said during the trial that having received an offer to make an IEA, he turned to the FSB. And all his further actions took place under the control of the FSB operatives.

Based on the materials of the criminal case, Pirogov twice handed over to Chiria “an object that imitates an executive mechanism made on the basis of electronic watches. And the transfer of dummies of explosive devices Chirnia was carried out "during the operational-search event" Operational Experiment ".

After spending several days in a prison cell, Chirny “remembered” that he acted on behalf of Oleg Sentsov, who was in the indictment, and later in the verdict the role of the organizer and the head of the terrorist group was assigned.

I repeat, if at the OSCE conference there was reliable information about how explosives were delivered to Crimea and transmitted to haymaking, the question involuntarily arises: where is this explosives now? It is obvious that if Sentsov has not found explosives, then it is still hidden somewhere in the Crimea and can be used at any time. And it turns out that the FSB openly missed the preparation of real terrorist attacks and missed a courier who delivered explosives to the Crimea.

However, I do not believe in a statement by Sergey Sterikov. The fact is that in the spring of 2014, the FSB worked so intensively in the Crimea that she would hardly miss the courier and those who were waiting for the “load” in place to use it. And Sterikov would not boast at the OSCE conference now, but served his sentence in the Russian colony. And the Russian investigation would not have to compose Oleg Sentsov a crime under which he was sentenced to 20 years in prison with serving a sentence in a maximum security colony.