Forgery, two chairs and "refuse"

Report from the court in the "theater case", during which Alexei Malobrodsky discovered a fake document

The forgery is the main news that was presented at the next meeting of the Basmanny Court on the terms of familiarization with the materials of the criminal case of the participants in the case of the “theatrical” case. The investigation wants to limit the deadlines, finally transfer the case to court.

The only and last one that has not yet been limited, Alexei Malobrodsky.

And he is a champion of speed reading: he was the first to read all 258 volumes. I read in a pre -trial detention center, read it in the hospital and, of course, already under the subscription about the lower room. And I saw: there are protocols that differ significantly from each other.

At the very beginning of the hearing, he stood up and said:

- I declare a discharge to the investigator Pavel Andreevich Vasiliev in connection with the forgery of documents signed by him and other members of the investigation group. In the case file, and I studied all volumes, a different protocol of the witness Voikina is presented, with the same details, but with the changed composition of the participants and the changed text. Having discovered this forgery, I sent a statement yesterday to the IC of Russia on the withdrawal of an investigative group and an application to the FSB of Russia about a crime.

Voikina, an employee of the seventh studio, from key witnesses, she was interrogated on July 14, 2017. One interrogation protocol lies in the case. The other was submitted to the court as a basis in order to keep Lose -Brodsky in jail. And they are different.

Simple scene. Judge Arthur Karpov (something elusively similar to the artist Vitaly Haeva, who pronounced the obscene monologue in Serebrennikovsky “depicting the victim”) froze. The investigator Pavel Vasiliev also numb.

The lawyer of Lesserobrodsky Ksenia Karpinskaya explains: the 237th volume of the case contains an interrogation, which is a tracing paper of the first, but in which pieces are inserted. In particular, in the old interrogation to the witness, whether she has a reason to stipulate Maslyaev, Voikina replies: “Yes, there is an occasion to stipulate because she stole the money!”

In the new one is another answer: "There is no reason, we have a good relationship!"

Behind this editing of the process of the process is the position of the investigative group in relation to the main witness of the prosecution, the accountant of the Seventh Studio Nina Maslyaeva.

Then a performance unfolds, in which there are a lot of implicitly accumulated court irritation and accusations, but even more absurd comic.

Judge Karpov (calmly): Did I understand correctly, are there two protocols with changed text?

Investigator Vasiliev (Burnic): I hear for the first time! These are defense fabrications! And in general, this is not a subject of real consideration.

Karpov (softly): This is the subject of your discharge. And the bases are specific - two different protocols.

Vasiliev: In principle, this cannot be! These are different protocols!

The judge (not without sarcasm): the defender speaks about this! (And - menacingly) Are you a court, or something, mislead?!

Prosecutor (quietly): But this is not the subject of the current trial!

The court is deleted to the deliberation room.

The result of Karpov’s concentrated thoughts - refuse! There will be no challenge. The court continues.

Whether the forgery has a place, the FSB will now understand.

However, a hidden comedic effect increases as a “assessment of the dynamics of familiarization” is given. The court and the accusation are trying to calculate how many days, hours, minutes, sheets and volumes have met the process of familiarization.

Judge (strictly): Read the obstacles to the protection side?

- Do not repair! From 9 to 18 can meet!

- How many working days have been spent?

- 103 working days!

- I ask you - how much did you get acquainted on the day?

“Average,” Vasiliev begins ...

- I don’t need to be average! It is necessary to answer the questions of the court significantly, based on the document.

–Advotok Karpinskaya how many times appeared?

- Thirty twenty twice.

- By the number of sheets and volumes per day - what is the minimum, the maximum?

Vasiliev digs papers.

Karpov is waiting.

Vasiliev digs.

- at least 1 volume, maximum 18.

- And in time?

Vasiliev is made red. Not ready. Finally reports:

- at least 25 minutes, a maximum of 3.5 hours.

It turns out that four defendants and seven defenders in the Investigative Committee have a small room allotted together to read the case. There are two chairs in it.

... the prosecutor does not deviate from the role: "... the accused and the defenders use the presented time inefficiently."

Alexey Malobrodsky is trying to explain to the court that a huge business even in 103 business days, given that it is difficult to read that in each of 258 volumes, it is difficult to read, and “it is doubly difficult to take into account my health.” During the summer, he lay twice in the hospital-first in the 20th, then-at the Research Institute of Cardiology.

But Karpov seems to be very tired of this matter in general.

- Closer to the essence! When do you finish the familiarization?

It turns out that, in addition to the main ones, there are also additional materials and material evidence. The large volume is on electronic media - it is still not provided. You cannot refuse the logic of the accused:

- If the volume is unknown to me - how can I say about the deadlines?

Karpinskaya’s lawyer for a meeting, unlike Vasiliev, is perfectly ready. She has been recorded in a detailed way by the clock of the entire schedule of “familiarization”: pre -trial detention center, courts, hospitals. By the way, it is mentioned that while the accused was in prison, the investigator did not bring him more than 2 volumes per day: hard. But when Malobrodsky was finally released from a pre -trial detention center, he read 6 volumes per day. Even in the hospital I was able to read 23 volumes. And the whole small forest went to the process of removing copies from all the materials of the case.

The main question hangs in the air: if one protocol is forged, how reliable are the others?

... Fifty minutes goes to Karpov for the final imprisonment of the court. The most amazing is not the result, it is predictable. The most amazing how he reads it.

Already had to write about torture with indistinguishable speech. But Karpov, perhaps, broke records: volumes, sheets, days, articles of the Criminal Code are mentioned, but the meaning cannot be caught. It is impossible, no matter how you strain your hearing in the small hall of the court. This manner, I venture to assume, has been developed because the judges have nothing to be proud of: fair decisions want to mint, forced to mutter in the pressure of current circumstances inaudibly.

Bottom line: The very decision on which the accusation initially insisted. The line will be summed up on September 1.