The victory of the general narrative

Why do the Russian military draw our country into a conflict with Israel?

At the General Staff of the Israeli Defense Army (IDF) in Tel Aviv, it was naturally amazed when it became clear that Russian colleagues in Moscow did not accept any actual data from the Israeli report on the tragic death of the IL-20 VKS electronic exploration and 15 officers on board.

The Israelis seemed to believe that for the meaningless death of so many military, shot down by the Russian rocket, formally launched allied air defense of the Syrian Arab Army (SAA), someone in the Russian military department should really answer and that it is only necessary to help establish all the facts. The shift of the KP group in Khmeimim lost on September 17 control over the operational situation in the subordinate airspace. Russian advisers and experts that helped the Syrians aiming the S-200 system missile on IL-20, sent a stream of false “objective” data to Moscow in order to justify themselves. For example, it was even argued that the French frigate Auvergne participated in the attack on September 17, which seemed to deal with a rocket blow to Latakia.

The commander of the Air Force IDC, General Amika Norkin, promptly arrived in Moscow with a delegation and with facts in his hands to help the Russian authorities understand the causes of the disaster and at the same time take away the accusations of the tragedy from the ISAL. Norkin was listened carefully and did not mind. The delegation of the IDF flew away, believing that the issue has been practically resolved, and now the Russians will deal with their own flaws without interfering with Israel more. Naive, rational Jews, where they understand that our General Staff and the Kremlin live in the world of total postmodern and that objective facts are not interested in anyone: the main thing is the narrative (plot) and the presentation, which was weak, consisted of intelligence and photographs, that is, without so beloved by our animation, and was not intended for accommodation on the Internet.

But General Igor Konashenkov on September 23 presented the public with a fantastic 3D multi presentation, from which it could be concluded that the Jews were to blame, and thus wiped his nose (shnobel) to Norkin, who claimed that the Israeli F-16, having bombed the Iranian objects in Latakia, immediately flew home and did not participate in the Il-20 disaster. Like, we were not there. From the cartoons of the Ministry of Defense, it followed that 4 double F-16I Sufa (“Storm”), dropping at 21.40 on targeted bombs from a long distance, did not fly away.

Almost unarmed after bombing, only with a self-defense weapon, according to the version of the Ministry of Defense, they barracks somewhere between Latakia and Cyprus for another hour in the zone of defeat of the Syrian and Russian anti-aircraft missiles and hundreds of kilometers from their native bases, while they flew on a mission with a complete bombing ammunition, and therefore with a reduced fuel reserve. IL-20, as you know, was shot down at 22.03. The Israeli F-16, according to Konashenkova, flew home only at 22.40, which is devoid of any military-technical meaning, but fit perfectly into the narrative of infernal Jewish insidiousness.

Konashenkov showed a picture of how the F-16 pilot with dashing maneuver forced the homing head (GOS) to sharply change the flight path of the S-200 missile and overdo it to IL-20. This is unlikely: GSN leads a target that a powerful parabolic radar “illuminates”, and only the operator can change something.

Yes, the Israelites did not come up with anything better than to repeat: "We were not there." But it is known that denial is the most inexhaustible plot.

It also turned out that the Israelis called just a minute before the blow and reported that the goal was in the north. From a Russian point of view, Latakia is the West of Syria, although looking from Israel - this is exactly in the north. Due to incorrect data, Konashenkov claims, the IL-20 could not take it to a safe place. But this statement is devoid of meaning: if the IDF fuzzyly outlined the target on the phone, then the subsequent blow corrected the situation. The bombs struck the Iranian target 25 km from the CP in Khmeimim, and this marked the present place brighter and more precisely of any words. Before the rocket entered the IL-20, 22 minutes remained (!). The change of KP was supposed to, assessing the situation, or take the plane, or stop the air of the air defense. Instead, the fire continued, and Il-20 was sent to the very fade. (The Israelis, by the way, claim that since the Russian military was not near the Iranian warehouse in Latakia, they were not required to call at all.)

Konashenkov at the presentation reminded of many good deeds of our Ministry of Defense, with whom ungrateful Israelis were not counted, malicious S-200 missiles persuaded the IL-20 missiles. Almost immediately, Sergei Shoigu announced an approximate punishment of Israel: the SAA will receive the S-300, which Assada promised for a long time, and Syrian air defense will be integrated with the Russian group using an automated control system. In the Mediterranean Sea near Syria, Russian REB systems will suppress the GPS and any other electronics of Israeli and any other aggressors. The minister added that if these measures are not enough to punish and correct Israel, then Moscow will add.

It became clear that the version of the treacherous Jews, who fly where they want, and the power of thought overdo the missiles, was invented not only to cover up the military leaders and sloppers from the punishment of the IL-20, but for the strategic purpose to change the Russian Middle Eastern policy: in fact, to return the Soviet time when ours really fought with DSACAL and carried and carried and carried and carried it Losses, and Soviet air defense were deployed in Syria.

Israel is the last technologically developed Western country that did not introduce sanctions against the Russian Federation. And this seems to be annoying many in Moscow.

The reinforced S-300 Striral forces in Syria and the IDF will almost certainly clash, and Russian experts-advisers will be on the line of fire, as once in 1982. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once again called Vladimir Putin, but the issue of supplying the S-300 in principle was already resolved.

However, the Kremlin (unlike the Ministry of Defense) claim that all this is not directed against Israel and that cooperation will continue. It is not yet known exactly how many divisions of which S-300 will be sent to the Syrians, where they will be placed when they begin to shoot at air purposes and how many Russian specialists will die, being in the zone of response. What plot will be chosen in the Kremlin: completely belligerent or not?