The name of the control

How one colonel rewrote the history of England

Valery Etneukov, senior adviser to the Russian Embassy in the United States, holds the position of attache of the Russian police (representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs) in the States. In his dissertation, Colonel Etnekov discovered that England in the XVII - XVIII centuries. Rules control. Well, everyone there is control: Yakov II, Wilhelm and Mary’s control with him, and then - all Georgi controlled. Well, the control of England Georg III lost the king over the British colonies in America.

The discovery of “England’s control” Colonel Etneukov draws in the conclusions of his dissertation on pages 163. Copying the work of other scientists dedicated to American corporate law, he did it so thoughtlessly and sweeping that the meaningful phrase “the very first corporations in the United States were the English colonization societies acting according to the king’s chart”: it turned into an ahine:

“The very first corporations in the United States were the British colonial joint -stock companies operating under the control chart.”

According to Dissernet, in the dissertation of Etnukov on 94 pages there was a copious text of four sources, while literally wrote off exactly half of the dissertation conclusions, which reflect the scientific novelty and relevance.

The Presidium of the Higher Attestation Committee this way recognized this Friday, following Colonel Etneukov and supporting him by expert council, that England during the colonization of America controls control. The control of England issued the charters to corporations, set taxes, signed decrees.

The conclusion of the Expert Council by law that was submitted for approval to the Presidium and which was recognized as the existence of the control of England, as well as the literal copy of the half of the conclusions was legalized, by three speakers: member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, deputy director of the institute of legislation and comparative law Andrei Vladimirovich Gabov, Major General Boris Yakovlevich Gavrilov and Professor Vladimir Vasilievich Zaitsev from the RANEPA.

In conclusion, it was argued that the coincidences of texts that see Gabov, Gavrilov and hares in the dissertation of Etnukov with the works of other persons do not affect its “quality characteristics”. The conclusion referred to the allegedly carried out page by the components of the texts attached to it, but as such, 30 pages were offered with very large font of short explanations to the pages of the dissertation of Etnekov, without direct text analysis.

Explanations, for example, the following: “On this page, the regulatory position of corporations in the United States is analyzed (and this analysis is written off or not-the speaker does not report),“ upon comprehensive consideration of the material used in the work, the author analyzes data from the sources and expresses his opinion on the question under study ”(well, what else does any researcher do in any work? But only which the author analyzed the data, the speakers not Explain).

So, the speakers who were preparing the conclusion of the expert council slipped the Higher School of Vak Filippov and the whole presidium dummy: instead of comparing texts, unfounded spells and empty mantras that "everything is fine on this page."

How did it happen that they put up the Presidium of the Higher Attestation Commission, which voted for their opus with the justification of the “control of England”, for the mockery?

To deal with this, a month ago, I verbally and in writing reported the members of A.V. Gabova about the fantastic discovery, which is proposed to approve the country's scientific examination. Subsequently, I sent Gabov a request: “I would like to understand whether you really think that the coincidence of 50% of the conclusions with the conclusions of the borrowed work can be interpreted as“ the inexhaustment of borrowing into the novelty ”. But the member of the Gabov did not answer this request to me. Probably, the control of England does not tell.

And now I am interested in: will the Higher Attestation Commission under the king take those who take such a “control chart” for his discussion?