SK Novokuznetsk did not initiate a criminal case against an activist of the Protest Kuzbass

At the end of December last year, the activist of the Protest Kuzbass Igor Gorlanov was roughly detained by several police officers on the street. On that day, he returned from a meeting in the case of Olga Gimmer, the mother of the coordinator of the movement of Leo Gimmer. Against the woman, the case was already initiated under the 318th article of the Criminal Code. So far, she is the only one who is attracted to the criminal article in connection with the activities of the “protest Kuzbass”.

After the trial, two men without a uniform approached Gorlanov - as it turned out from the Decree of the SK, they were defended from the police - and asked to travel with them to the department for a conversation in connection with the picket, which was previously conducted by the young man. After that, as can be seen fromthe broadcast led by Gorlanov, the operative Vladislav Fedyaev turned out to be near him and took the phone.

The oppositionist told the OVD-Info that, although he did not understand why he was delayed, he agreed to go with the police to the department. Gorlanov wanted to warn friends who were nearby, for which he got the initially smartphone. “The operatives began to ask:“ Why did you get the phone, why do you need it? ” - says the activist. - Then the policeman began to grab my hand, and after that they dragged me to the car, began to try to cram inward. I screamed “Help!”, To which people not far from paying attention to. Thanks to passers -by, I managed to start broadcasting. ” The decision from the UK is not mentioned that the police did not allow the activist to warn friends, nor that they grabbed the phone from him, but it is indicated that Gorlanov tried to run away. He denies it.

As follows from the decree of the SK and from the words of Gorlanov himself, when the operative of Fedyaev approached, all three began to stuff the activist into the car again.

“At the place of Gorlanov I. I. in an official car, he actively resisted, clinging his arms and legs behind the doors and frames of the car interior doors, preventing it from closing it, putting his head and his legs between the door and the car body, not allowing it to close, calling through passers -by to help, informing him that the bandits were kidnapped. At the same time, in the course of the provision of active physical resistance, Gorlanov I. I. tried to push away from the employees with his feet, inadvertently dumped Fedyaev V.V. on the hand, from which the latter experienced physical pain, in addition, I. Gorlanov He broke the handle for opening the rear passenger door of the official car, ”investigator Anna Bulatova wrote in the resolution from Fedyaeva.

Gorlanov does not deny that he resisted the detention, as he still wanted to have time to notify his acquaintances, and assumes that he could accidentally touch the operator’s foot, which he himself did not notice. The activist noted that one of the police officers strangled him when he tried to drag him into the car from his back.

“During the path, they began to threaten me that they would send me to a psychiatric hospital, like I am inadequate,” Gorlanov continues, “and the operative of Fedyaev, pointing me to the wound or scratch on his hand, threatened the 318th article, they say, I bit him, said“ you will sit ”.

In the department itself, according to the opposition, they continued to threaten him with a criminal article and did not give a mobile phone until the end of the detention. In the end, it was drawn up for him under an article on disobedience to the police officer (Article 19.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses) and released late in the evening. He needed to go to the house on foot for several kilometers in severe frost. Later, the court returned the police a protocol to Gorlanov to eliminate violations.

The moment of detention actually ends the significant side of the verification materials, the investigator Bulatov, as can be seen from the decision, did not find in the actions of Gorlanov the direct intent to harm the police officer.

Thus, analyzing the data obtained during the audit, we can conclude that V.V. Fedyaev’s explanations should be taken critically, confirming the commission of unlawful actions against him from Gorlanov I.I. Not installed.

Igor Gorlanov recalls that the investigator Bulatov arrived at the department almost immediately after his delivery, and, in his opinion, she was then determined to “establish the 318th article as a fact”. The activist believes that this did not happen, because he gave a wide public case with the detention and wrote that he was conducting an audit.

In a conversation after the detention, as during telephone conversations with the investigator, Gorlanov refused to give any evidence, citing an article of the Constitution (giving the right to not testify against himself), explaining this with a common distrust of law enforcement agencies. Together with lawyer Maria Yankina, who helped the activist with the support of the OTD-Info , Gorlanov eventually made an official refusal to participate in the pre-investigation.

From the record of the telephone conversation made by Gorlanov (is at the disposal of the editorial office), and from the decree it follows that Bulatova demonstrated objectivity during the audit. So, to the refusal of Gorlanov to come to the conversation, the woman claimed that "police officers are a third -party organization, and we are conducting an audit against them." The final resolution really indicated that the audit was carried out in relation to the operative of Fedyaev under the article on knowingly false denunciation (part 1 of article 306 of the Criminal Code). The case was also refused.

“I have not yet written any statement, but I consider it wrong to refuse the 306th article, this is at least biased,” concludes Gorlanov. “In the department, they threatened me in every possible way, their actions were intended and targeted, judging by their conversations, they were about to close me.”

• Activists of the “Protest Kuzbass movement” in Novokuznetsk are often detained by police. At the end of August, employees of the ED Center, including Vladislav Fedyaev, is the conversation with the participants of the Protest Kuzbass, Mila Zemtsova and Fedor Reguzov. They were suspected of hanging the Putin thief poster on the transport interchange of the left bank. Young people said that one of the police officers hit the girl on the head.
• In November, it became known that Zemtsov and Ryazov were summoned for a conversation in the Investigative Committee, as they complained of the operative of Fedyaev because of their posts on Twitter. The policeman did not like the posts of young activists, where he is called a “stupid employee” and “badly person”.
• At the end of September, against the mother of Leo Gimmer, a criminal case was opened under an article on violence against a policeman due to the fact that she allegedly hit the policeman during the detention of Mila Zemtsova before the action against pension reform.