"After Valera was killed ..."

The widow of the entrepreneur Valery Pshenichniki realized what her husband had in mind when he wrote from prison: “Nobody pay anyone”

Valery Pshenichichnaya died in the SIZO-4 cell in St. Petersburg a year ago, February 5, 2018. And on February 3, as the Novaya ", a 70-year-old woman named Tatyana Vladimirovna Zavrazhnova acquired a Ford Explorer car with a 3.5-liter engine volume. There is such a car of 2.5 million rubles. It was registered by proxy by someone Zavrazhnov Sergey Viktorovich. In the same way, the name of the investigator, who conducted the work of wheat and persistently petitioned the premises of the defendant in a pre -trial detention center. The defense then asked to limit her at least house arrest, because wheat transferred a stroke, medical certificates on this score were taken during a search. But in court about the preventive measure, it turned out that for some reason the investigator did not fade in the case of these papers.

Three months later, in May, the investigator of the GSU of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region, Lieutenant Colonel of Justice Sergey Viktorovich Zavrazhnov issued a decision on the suspension of a criminal case against a person whom Pshenichichny accused of the theft of 100 million rubles. This is his former general director Andrei Petrov.

The New Gazeta sent an official request to the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region with a request for the comments of Sergey Zavrazhnov, but we were refused standard formulations: they say, a consequence.

The fact that Petrov is completely free and lives a full life, the widow of Pshenichnika recognized recently, in December. And even then - demanding information from Zavrazhnov through the court. Before that, he responded to requests with unsubscribes. More precisely, Zavrazhnov introduced these answers in court, but the relatives of wheat claim that they did not even receive them.

Then Natalya Pshenichnaya realized what the last note of her husband meant: "Nobody pay anyone."

- Natalya Vladimirovna, why only now, a year later, do you understand what your spouse had in mind?

- Then I was so shocked by what was happening that I could not get together with my thoughts for a long time. I only understood that Valera was in danger.

- Danger - do you mean a criminal case, court, term? Or a physical threat?

- Now I already think that there is a physical threat for our entire family.

Help "New"
Recall that Valery Pshenichichniki was detained, and then placed under the arrest in pre-trial detention center-4 on January 16, 2018. He was charged with fraud in spending the funds received by his company “Night Pro” for the implementation of a billion state defense order for the Admiralty Shipyard plant. But this case began much earlier, in February 2017, and at the request of Pshenichny himself. The accused was held by his general director Andrei Petrov, whom Pshenichny accused of theft of 100 million rubles. Petrov was arrested in April. In September, the new investigator - Sergey Zavrazhnov accepted the case. And very soon Petrov was released under the subscription of a lower leave, partially recognizing the theft. But the money to the accounts of the firms did not return.

- Natalya Vladimirovna, what exactly did you understand about that note of your husband?

-About a month before the arrest, in December 2017, the husband had some kind of serious conversation. He went to the meeting. He returned as lowered in the water. I asked what was the matter, because I have not seen him for a long time. He was very depressed. And for a long time I did not want to speak, I kept everything in myself. I asked in every way and was able to talk to him. After a couple of days, he told what was the matter. He spoke very emotionally. He said that money was demanded from him. For the money, they promised to continue to investigate Petrov’s case, Petrova to plant again, and leave the company alone. They told her husband that if he pays, he would not touch him all. Otherwise, they said, the criminal case will already be against him.

- Did he refuse to pay?

- He told me: “Natasha, what will I pay for? I don’t feel guilty in anything at all. ” He said that the contract with which they worked was generally unprofitable, and Petrov created problems to the company.

- Did your husband know that a criminal case was opened?

- Apparently, he knew that this should have happened, but did not tell me. I only knew that Petrov once, with the employees, said that he would take the company at all.

- Did you say that?

-Yes, yes, it was at the moment when Valera demanded to explain where the money disappeared, and Petrov publicly sent him.

Help "New"
The new criminal case was opened on December 12, 2017, in it the wheat appeared no longer as a victim, but as a twist of the same 100 million. Petrov gave such testimonies against him, and the investigation decided to believe him.

- How much was Valery Anatolyevich required at that meeting?

“He told me that it was about one hundred million rubles.”

- This is exactly the amount that was charged with him as part of a criminal case. Maybe he was offered not to give a bribe, but to voluntarily compensate for the damage?

- No, he said that they demanded to pay for him everything was in order, and Pathaled Petrov again.

- Who exactly did your spouse meet with?

-I only know that these were some people in uniform. But he did not name the rank or surnames.

- When we talked the last time, and that was a year ago, you did not understand what that note meant. Something happened, which is why you suddenly remembered the December trip of your husband?

- After they killed Valera, I was too scared and confused. And three months ago a friend came up to me and said: I then warned Valera to pay that he did not listen to me. And the husband simply did not believe that they could get the case on him.

- Can you call this friend?

- No, I will not call him.

- But after the publication of our conversation, you may already ask you, for example, a consequence.

“I cannot call this person.” He was a friend of the family, I will not substitute him. You understand, I just do not want the fate that befell my husband, hit someone else. I cannot take such responsibility.

-You or your son have received some other requirements?

- People who I do not want to call for the same reason contacted me three times. I think they were just some kind of information guides. Some intermediaries. I want to hope that they did this from a good attitude to our family. But three times they came up to me and said: Natasha, you and your husband have property, you probably have money, let's meet and discuss how you will live further, maybe you will only have a part of the property ... They offered to agree, "find the points of contact." I said that I would not discuss these topics, because everything that we have, my husband earned with his labor, here he will come out - and he will make decisions himself.

- What did they offer in exchange for money and property?

- Freedom of Valera. They offered to "resolve the issue."

-Did you demand something other than money?

- I have no. But before the arrest, when we had a search, the investigator said that if Valera testifies, he would be left a witness. There were three investigators. One of them said: Valery Anatolyevich, you know what information we expect from you, think well and make a decision, because otherwise you will not return to this house and you will not see your wife.

You, said, have a choice between your life-and some minimum time. Or maybe he says, we will issue a conditional term to you.

- Did you say that?

- Yes, in open text. Valera looked at him so ... He understood what was happening. I understood that they would demand evidence from him. He was essentially a truthful way, he always had to say what he thought. He could restrain himself, but could not lie. And here, as it seemed to me, they demanded that someone demanded from him.

-For someone specific?

- I don't know. But they needed some information from him. At home, they were looking for some flash drives, some kinds of wheels. And when they finished looking, the investigator put Valera in front of him and says: Valery Anatolyevich, you are just a missing link in this game, we cannot move on without your testimony. I say, I see that your company really performed work, but we need your testimony.

- Do you think the investigator understood that the accusation of thefts is empty?

“He understood that he needed only evidence from Valera.” Valerina was not discussed at all.

-Were there any other requirements or proposals?

- From Denis they demanded to testify against the pope. I understand that the investigation did not have enough witnesses to prove some conspiracy. Denis refused to negotiate dad. They threatened him that then he would go an accomplice.

Help "New"
Valeria Pshenichichniki was found in the SIZO-4 camera hanged, repeat, on February 5. The leadership of the Federal Penitentiary Service in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region announced that it was undoubtedly suicide. Later, the forensic examination found on the face and body of the deceased more than forty abrasions, bruises and stab wounds. On the fingers, on the tongue, on the mucous membrane of the mouth - 19 marks from shock. And also signs of sexual violence and traces of seed fluid with DNA of an unknown man. New examinations found that the tools of torture and “suicide” were a homemade knife, which had been in the cell and a lace of unknown origin, at which the wheat man managed to “hang” without touching his hands.

-If something was achieved from wheat, then what could it be? Money? Guilty admission? Indications for someone?

- And you know ... I think that at first they could demand evidence. Then they could ask for money. And then they saw that he would not give one or the other. And after that, something got out of control. Some uncontrollable process went. Maybe the excess of the performer ...

Help "New"
Valery Pshenichichnaya died in the SIZO-4 cell in St. Petersburg a year ago, February 5, 2018. And on February 3, as the Novaya ", a 70-year-old woman named Tatyana Vladimirovna Zavrazhnova acquired a Ford Explorer car with a 3.5-liter engine volume. There is such a car of 2.5 million rubles. It was registered by proxy by someone Zavrazhnov Sergey Viktorovich. In the same way, the name of the investigator, who conducted the work of wheat and persistently petitioned the premises of the defendant in a pre -trial detention center. The defense then asked to limit her at least house arrest, because wheat transferred a stroke, medical certificates on this score were taken during a search. But in court about the preventive measure, it turned out that for some reason the investigator did not fade in the case of these papers.

Three months after the death of Pshenichny, in May 2018, investigator Zavrazhnov decided that Andrei Petrov not only deserves freedom, but also could not continue to remain the accused. The case against him was suspended with the wording "in connection with a temporary serious illness." This "severe disease" does not prevent Petrov from studying in a fitness center and participating in races on a motorcycle.

Evidence of this is probably at the disposal of the leadership of the police headquarters, because the “new” published them. But what conclusions we made from this, we do not know, because, we repeat, we were refused in the comments. The money that disappeared from the accounts of the company did not return there.

The criminal case on the death of Valery Pshenichniki is still being investigated under the article on bringing to suicide. After the first publications of the “new” about obvious signs of torture, the Investigative Committee hastened to take a non -disclosure subscription from the widow.

- Natalya Vladimirovna, I understand that you are connected by a subscription, but can you at least say at what stage the case is about the death of your spouse?

- Yes, I regularly go to meetings with the investigator. And each time they try to convince me that it is ... Well, suicide. You, they say, agree that now we will not find anyone, let's already come to the conclusion that this is suicide. Each time I have the feeling that some kind of “processing of a client” is happening.