Primorye: Koibov manufacturers did not explain dubious protocols

The manufacturer of Smart URN for voting, KOIB 2010, which were used in the repeated elections of the governor of Primorye , the company "Krok Incorporated" was unable to answer claims regarding the reliability of the data in the final protocols. A request for four claims sent to the company at the end of January remained unanswered, the lawyer Polina Sidelnikova, representing the interests of the applicants, told the Siberia. Real correspondent. At the same time, on February 20, the next case is assigned.

"The manufacturer of Koiba simply ceased to interact on this issue and does not answer calls. We declare the protocol’s forgery on the grounds that it could be made using another software or device. We are important to the developer’s position. It is he who can explain the cause of the differences that were discovered in the protocols. I can only hope for a comprehensive and fair approach during the next meeting. We are dealing with an important precedent, Since the protocol is contrary to the legality of the voting results.

SR in mobile SR on Instagram Wed Facebook

Note that 16 questions were formulated in the request. Can KOIB-2010 issue protocols of different formats? Can KOIB-2010 change printing parameters? Is external intervention possible for changing the Press parameters of COIB-2010? and others. The answers to them could help deal with falsifications and understand how to identify them in the future.

The applicant in the case, the head of the small shipyard in Vladivostok and a member of the precinct election commission No. 507 in the Leninsky district, Anatoly Chepikov, says that he simply could not close his eyes to obvious violations. “There were too many traces of falsification in the elections. Of course, I filed a lawsuit. Why did I become a member of the precinct election commission, tried to control the honesty of the election process? You know, the city portal of Vladivostok conducted a survey:“ Do you trust the results of the election of the governor of the Territory? ”81.7% answered that this is not trusted. The ashes.

The co -chair of the movement in defense of the voter rights "Voice" Yuri Gurman agrees that the analysis of the voting results and the identified anomalies called into question the result of the repeated elections in Primorye. "The election commission and official structures evaded the proceedings in hot pursuit, although it was obvious to everyone that" something was not clean. "The manufacturer’s answers could help to understand what the problem was, how and at what point there was falsification. But the fact that they did not give a response to sad thoughts," the expert said.

At the same time, during a meeting of the Central Election Commission, on February 13, its chairman’s deputy Nikolai Bulaev stated that Koibi was working and their software device was not subjected to any external influence.

Wed on YouTube Wed to Yandex.Zen